> > OK, tried the "T" experiment (essentially a blind-ended sensor
> > post)... and there is not adequate circulation. The temps went up but
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> certainly the temp guage on my mini tends to behave as you just described
> your experiment.
Based on my experiment, the sender DOES need to be in the flow of things (or
very much near the main coolant, as opposed to an off-shoot).
> Driving at 50kph often means the engine is warmer then at 100kph, I guess
> this is do to the amount of air passing through the rad, as at low speeds I
> wouldn't imagine the fan being terribly efficient - this is backed up by
> all those people talking about overheating in traffic. :)
It was striking though... I mean the temp went WAY down (and normally with
equivalent driving, I'd have seen it go up). I figured that the assembly I
had put together (which I photographed and could post - it's not big) was
being cooled by the wind.
The Muffin Man - 06 Jul 2003 08:39 GMT
I have a mech gauge in the head with the small spacer and the electrical
gauge on the clocks. You can tell that it works properly because the
thermostat opens at the spot on correct temperature.
The Muffin Man
> > > OK, tried the "T" experiment (essentially a blind-ended sensor
> > > post)... and there is not adequate circulation. The temps went up but
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> had put together (which I photographed and could post - it's not big) was
> being cooled by the wind.
Boink - 06 Jul 2003 17:07 GMT
Yes, I was wondering if when the thermostat opened enough water diverted
from my little sensor experiment that it dropped that much in temp.
"The Muffin Man" <
> I have a mech gauge in the head with the small spacer and the electrical
> gauge on the clocks. You can tell that it works properly because the
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> > had put together (which I photographed and could post - it's not big) was
> > being cooled by the wind.