Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Mitsubishi Cars / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

2005  Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
john - 13 Sep 2005 15:24 GMT
2005  Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution

The review of the latest Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution are...
One of the best-handling sedans available at any price, razor-sharp steering, ample turbocharged power, sophisticated all-wheel-drive system, stripped-down RS model offers serious bang for the buck.

It is avilable in three trims at
http://www.markmitsu.com/
Greg - 18 Sep 2005 04:53 GMT
Is the RS model the 2.4 non-turbo version?    If so,  it might be a
decent 'sporty' car but there is no comparison to the 20 PSI boosting
4g63t  'performance monster'  that is the real EVO!   Mid 15's vs low
13's in the  1/4 mi is only one of the many differences along with no
AWD! That performance retarded downgraded N/T version is an EVO
WANNABE!.
ya - 18 Sep 2005 22:17 GMT
The RS is arguably the fastest EVO of the bunch....(MR owners may disagree)

The RS is basically an evo with a 4g63t and AWD, it has a stripped down
trunk, no power windows / locks, pretty much a purpose built race car (I've
heard some don't come with AC but the ones in my area do).  In short, the RS
is all EVO.  Mitsu took a similar approach as ford did back a few years ago
when they came out with the cobra R mustang.

> Is the RS model the 2.4 non-turbo version?    If so,  it might be a
> decent 'sporty' car but there is no comparison to the 20 PSI boosting
> 4g63t  'performance monster'  that is the real EVO!   Mid 15's vs low
> 13's in the  1/4 mi is only one of the many differences along with no
> AWD! That performance retarded downgraded N/T version is an EVO
> WANNABE!.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.