A Eclipse GT is $1000.00 more than a base model EVO. Wrap your mind around
that.
I have not even checked on the price, but $1k more than the EVO... Wow!
>A Eclipse GT is $1000.00 more than a base model EVO. Wrap your mind around
>that.
>> Mitsubishi renews Eclipse
>> at http://www.washtimes.com/autoweekend/20051006-091702-2273r.htm
one more thing, they should put the eagle talon/eclipse 2nd gen body on the
EVO. Maybe a little long and wide but...
>A Eclipse GT is $1000.00 more than a base model EVO. Wrap your mind around
>that.
>> Mitsubishi renews Eclipse
>> at http://www.washtimes.com/autoweekend/20051006-091702-2273r.htm
Nobody U. Know - 09 Oct 2005 03:51 GMT
I agree, the 2G was the best looking car Mitsu put out. With the EVO 4G63 it
would have been a winner. Too bad they put in a weaker ECU, turbo, cheaper
crank, and transmission.

Signature
------------------------
> one more thing, they should put the eagle talon/eclipse 2nd gen body on the
> EVO. Maybe a little long and wide but...
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> >> Mitsubishi renews Eclipse
> >> at http://www.washtimes.com/autoweekend/20051006-091702-2273r.htm