To my surprise, I found in a posting of this newsgroup that it is
"standard practice to replace BOTH belts, as the balance belt is right
behind the timing belt".
Is it true? Are there two belts (timing and balance) to replace every
60K in addition to water pump ? Do any of you had trouble with balance
belt breakage?
Thanks.
Eric F - 28 Feb 2006 03:31 GMT
you might as well, you have to break the timing belt loose, replace
everything.
> To my surprise, I found in a posting of this newsgroup that it is
> "standard practice to replace BOTH belts, as the balance belt is right
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> belt breakage?
> Thanks.
Nobody U. Know - 28 Feb 2006 11:55 GMT
The answer is based on risk. There have been a few broken balance belts that
have taken out the timing belt. Others break with no problems. The labor is
not significantly more than a timing belt, so why not? BTW, I wasn't aware
the V6 Galant even had a balance belt.

Signature
------------------------
> To my surprise, I found in a posting of this newsgroup that it is
> "standard practice to replace BOTH belts, as the balance belt is right
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> belt breakage?
> Thanks.
Stewart DIBBS - 28 Feb 2006 12:23 GMT
> Are there two belts (timing and balance) to replace every
> 60K
Yes. Waterpumps do wear out, but should last 100K or so. The test is whether
there's ANY roughness to be felt when when the pump is turned manually.
Replacement part is about $40, and the labour to get at it is the same to
chnage the belts, which is why the recommendation is there.
Balance belts also suffer from age and oil contamination, the same a cam
belts. If a balance belt breaks or strips some teeth, best case the engine
will virbrate, but the usual worst case is that a broken piece will cause
the can belt to jump teeth or break. Thi$ often cause$ major engine damage,
$uch as bent valve$.

Signature
Stewart DIBBS
www.pixcl.com/lancerproject.htm