93 octane? where do uhave to go to get that, highest one i seen were always,
87 89 91
> With the lead footed driving (is there any other kind in evo?) how many
> miles do you typically get per tank in an unmodified evo?
> She drinks 93 octane gas, right?
Body Roll - 04 Apr 2006 05:26 GMT
At the airport I guess :-)
I meant 91 then. I'll pay attention to the labels next time.
simpleton - 04 Apr 2006 10:45 GMT
My tank is filled with 94.... (25psi and NO knock!)
It all depends on the state/region you live in.
> 93 octane? where do uhave to go to get that, highest one i seen were
> always, 87 89 91
>
>> With the lead footed driving (is there any other kind in evo?) how many
>> miles do you typically get per tank in an unmodified evo?
>> She drinks 93 octane gas, right?
> With the lead footed driving (is there any other kind in evo?) how many
> miles do you typically get per tank in an unmodified evo?
If you have to ask...
A review I have here (L'Automobile Magazine (French), December 2005)
measured an Evo VIII at 37.3 l/100 Km in a track (probably a slow one,
since this is really an high value).
In more normal conditions, values above 20l/100km seem to be quite easy to get.
An maerican test:
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedan/112_0503_2005_lancer_comparison/specs_
price.html
MT observed mpg 18.1 (MR: 16.6; RS: 17.6)
With only 55l in the fuel tank, its autonomy is quite short.

Signature
http://www.mat.uc.pt/~rps/
.pt is Portugal| `Whom the gods love die young'-Menander (342-292 BC)
Europe | Villeneuve 50-82, Toivonen 56-86, Senna 60-94
Body Roll - 05 Apr 2006 18:02 GMT
> > With the lead footed driving (is there any other kind in evo?) how many
> > miles do you typically get per tank in an unmodified evo?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> measured an Evo VIII at 37.3 l/100 Km in a track (probably a slow one,
> since this is really an high value).
http://www.projects.ex.ac.uk/trol/scol/ccfuel.htm
for the lazy people around here
> In more normal conditions, values above 20l/100km seem to be quite easy to get.
>
> An maerican test:
> http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedan/112_0503_2005_lancer_comparison/specs_
price.html
> MT observed mpg 18.1 (MR: 16.6; RS: 17.6)
Thank you. I did not notice that part of the spec when I skimmed that
review for the first time.