Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Mitsubishi Cars / April 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

07 eclipse

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Sonny Sonny - 31 Jul 2006 18:15 GMT
my daughter just bought an 07 eclipse. traded in her 99 eclipse for it.
which she also bought new. she loves those eclipses. its a 5 speed  4
cyl like her 99 was. she always shifts at like 4000 rpm.to me that is a
little high. i shift at like 3000 rpm. she just kind of winds it out.
tried to get her to shift at like around 3000 rpm but she is just in the
habit of 4000 rpm. she doest even look at the tach just feels right to
her at around 4000 rpm. just wondering if you guys think that is too
high on a regular basis. her 99 was burning a little oil at 76000 miles
like 1 qt every 1500 miles or so. just wondering what you guys thought.
thanks
simpleton - 01 Aug 2006 04:12 GMT
Your kid is the better driver...You are shifting before the torque peak and
having to lug the motor back up.
> my daughter just bought an 07 eclipse. traded in her 99 eclipse for it.
> which she also bought new. she loves those eclipses. its a 5 speed  4
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> like 1 qt every 1500 miles or so. just wondering what you guys thought.
> thanks
Bob Shuman - 02 Aug 2006 00:47 GMT
> Your kid is the better driver...You are shifting before the torque peak
> and having to lug the motor back up.

The answer depends on the goal: Is it economy or acceleration/power?

Unless you are going up a steep grade at 3,000 RPM in my opinion you
shouldn't be overloading the engine.

Bob
simpleton - 02 Aug 2006 02:03 GMT
He's discussing a shift point.

If you shift before the torque peak, the engine speed falls below maximum
torque and has to labor in a very un-economical fashion to accellerate.
A great many of us have found that our Eclipses respond to being briskly
shifted and that granny shifting consumes more fuel.
I can do 22 city 30 highway in a 450whp all wheel drive car this way.

>> Your kid is the better driver...You are shifting before the torque peak
>> and having to lug the motor back up.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Bob
MXW - 02 Aug 2006 15:25 GMT
This is pointless in regard to Mitsu engines.
These units exhibit extreme wear & tear above 3000 rpm
3000 rpm should be strictly observed when driving any Mitsu.
One of the first racing scenes in the movie Fast&Furious shows well
what happens if you do not observe 3000 rpm limit in Mitsu
You go above 3000 rpm in Mitsu - just once for more than a minute - and lucky you if
the alternator belt is all what has to be replaced !
2000 rpm is optimal for these cars.

> He's discussing a shift point.
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>
>> Bob
Stewart DIBBS - 02 Aug 2006 19:18 GMT
> One of the first racing scenes in the movie Fast&Furious shows well
> what happens if you do not observe 3000 rpm limit in Mitsu

I smell troll ... and of course Fast&Furious is based on reality.

Signature

Stewart DIBBS
www.pixcl.com/lancerproject.htm

fu-Z-logic - 03 Aug 2006 13:38 GMT
> "MXW" <mxw@nowhere.here> wrote in message
... and of course Fast&Furious is based on reality.

Don't like the sound of an OTA BOV on a 420A?.. I almost walked out of the
theatre when I saw that.. Or the fact that the Eclipse was equipped with a
7-speed transaxle in the race.

Classic... LOL

ech (Just sold my '95 GS.. Hoping to buy a 2gen 2nd edition GST or GSX)
Andrea - 02 Aug 2006 19:41 GMT
MXW ha scritto:
> This is pointless in regard to Mitsu engines.
> These units exhibit extreme wear & tear above 3000 rpm
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the alternator belt is all what has to be replaced !
> 2000 rpm is optimal for these cars.

well I run usually my 1991 Eclipse at 4500 rpm in the highway for 2
hours without the minimum disease.. and I find that the top quality
drive is between 3000 and 4500 rpm-. 4500-6700 is really fast & furious,
but too dangerous in normal conditions..
simpleton - 02 Aug 2006 21:35 GMT
Bwahaha! This one hits 11,000 rpm every weekend......
http://www.shepracing.com/racecar.php

The F&F reference was classic!

> This is pointless in regard to Mitsu engines.
> These units exhibit extreme wear & tear above 3000 rpm
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>>>
>>> Bob
MXW - 03 Aug 2006 14:36 GMT
I just damaged another alt. belt. Wanted be first on the green light.
I got Dayco this time.

> Bwahaha! This one hits 11,000 rpm every weekend......
> http://www.shepracing.com/racecar.php
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>>>
>>>> Bob
simpleton - 03 Aug 2006 17:03 GMT
Dayco belts make an extra 15hp over stock belts!

WARNING! *Manifold Danger*

>I just damaged another alt. belt. Wanted be first on the green light.
> I got Dayco this time.
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>>>>>
>>>>> Bob
MXW - 03 Aug 2006 18:35 GMT
:-)
If you do not believe  I can send you sample after I race it over 3000 rpm
It is always alt. belt, ps and a/c are fine and if you google you can see that many people reported such flaw with 4G64 engine.

> Dayco belts make an extra 15hp over stock belts!
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bob
simpleton - 03 Aug 2006 23:57 GMT
Take a look at the crank hub pulley.
Mitsubishi uses a two piece design: an inner cast hub and an outer pulley
section that are held together by a vulcanized rubber
center section. The rubber center section turns the piece into an effective
harmonic damper, lessening harmful rotational vibrations in the crankshaft.
While this unit works well, the rubber is prone to becoming brittle and
allowing the outer hub to separate. Belts falling off is a certain symptom
of failure.
The 4G64 is a rock solid motor.

> :-)
> If you do not believe  I can send you sample after I race it over 3000 rpm
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bob
MXW - 07 Aug 2006 13:39 GMT
Crank pulley is fine.
Could it be that outer water pump pulley is mounted opposite ?
I.e. that pulley has a flange on one side.
Can you tell on which side that flange should be ?

> Take a look at the crank hub pulley.
> Mitsubishi uses a two piece design: an inner cast hub and an outer pulley section that are held together by a vulcanized rubber
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bob
Chance - 03 Aug 2006 20:18 GMT
> I just damaged another alt. belt. Wanted be first on the green light.
> I got Dayco this time.

At least I'm not the only one to lose an alt belt while flogging one of
these cars.  I guess 130 on the interstate will do that LOL!!

Regards,
Chance
Nirodac - 05 Aug 2006 17:07 GMT
>> I just damaged another alt. belt. Wanted be first on the
>> green light. I got Dayco this time.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Regards,
> Chance

Would that be 130 MPH or 130 KPH?.
The Eclipse (2003) has a governor that limits upper end speed to
160 kilometers per hour  (100 MPH).
Andrea - 05 Aug 2006 18:38 GMT
Nirodac ha scritto:

> The Eclipse (2003) has a governor that limits upper end speed to
> 160 kilometers per hour  (100 MPH).

LOL I'll never buy a 2003 Eclipse!
;-)

andrea
simpleton - 05 Aug 2006 19:30 GMT
Don't worry about that Andrea. Speed limiters have been used on many Eclipse
models due to being equipped from the factory with crummy tires. The AWD
cars had better tires and no limiter. The difference is just a single
resistor in the ECU.

http://www.dsm.org/how-tos/speedlimiter.htm

> Nirodac ha scritto:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> andrea
Chance - 06 Aug 2006 08:42 GMT
> Would that be 130 MPH or 130 KPH?.
> The Eclipse (2003) has a governor that limits upper end speed to
> 160 kilometers per hour  (100 MPH).

130 MPH 1992 GS-T  Sorry my post wasn't really relevant to the OP, just
another me too post for the guy talking about thrashing an alt belt.
After I posted it I realized they were talking about the 4G64 mine is
of coarse a 4G63 turbo.  
Regards,
Chance
Sonny Sonny - 03 Aug 2006 16:54 GMT
looks like the jury is still out on this one. it says in the book that
peak
torque is 4000 rpm. will tell  my daughter 4000 rpm is a fine shift
point. think most of you agree it shouldn't hurt the engine.mxw says
these engines should not be run over 2000rpm. cant go with that one
since 2000 rpm in 5th gear is 46 mph. might get run over on the
interstate lol. i like those 5 speeds. fun to drive. not the same as my
old 57 ford fairlane with the 3 speed on the column. bet you guys don't
remember any of those. thanks to all
Sean - 25 Mar 2007 23:04 GMT
> my daughter just bought an 07 eclipse. traded in her 99 eclipse for it.
> which she also bought new. she loves those eclipses. its a 5 speed  4
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> like 1 qt every 1500 miles or so. just wondering what you guys thought.
> thanks

Sounds like sludge. I also have the 07 Eclipse GS. It's a great car.
For more information on how to care for her new car, visit
http://www.dsm.org/how-tos/speedlimiter.htm. My name in the forums is
mutiny and there are a lot of guys there with a LOT of know how when it
comes to Mitsubishi in general, but they know a TON more when it comes
to Eclipses (no matter which generation).

Don't forget to drop by http://www.dsm.org/how-tos/speedlimiter.htm...
it can't hurt.

--Sean (aka mutiny)
Brandon McCombs - 14 Apr 2007 05:56 GMT
>> my daughter just bought an 07 eclipse. traded in her 99 eclipse for it.
>> which she also bought new. she loves those eclipses. its a 5 speed  4
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> --Sean (aka mutiny)

I just bought a 2007 Eclipse Spyder GT and if I wait to shift above 3k
RPM then I use up noticeably more gas. If I stick to around 2k or 2500
then my MPG seems to go up a couple. I'm still in the middle of a tank
where I'm trying to not go above 2500 so the exact MPG hasn't been
calculated yet but I'm looking to get around 22MPG out of this tank
instead of 19.5 I got out of the last one.  Maybe the GS isn't so bad
since it is a smaller engine and is only a 5 speed (mine is a V6 and 6
speed) but I would think shifting at a lower RPM would still save some
gas. The owner's manual should tell you at what speeds to shift (mine
does). My manual says I should be going into 5th gear around 50-55 mph I
believe. What's her manual say?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.