Is this a turbo vehicle? If not, the boost sensor is probably really a MAP
sensor. That is on the t-body. So is the TPS sensor. I have a feeling the
problem is there. If you see black smoke, that is too rich. The ECU is
probably getting a erroneous signal from the TPS or MAP.

Signature
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Benjamin Franklin
Thank you for the Patriot Act you cowards.
> Hello
> I have a 1996 2.8 automatic Pajero with a problem. I have taken the car to
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> helping.. Best regards
> blue-python UK
blue-python - 08 Jun 2004 08:32 GMT
Yes it is a turbo 2.8 ltr and the problem is intermitant. You can drive for
hours whilst towing with no problem and then the next day the fault
happens, it makes no difference the speed or load that you are producing!
Thank you for your suggestion. I will now go back to the Main Mitsi
dealers who frankly have been expensive and have not helped much at all!
(I will never buy a car from them)
You may want to check the owner forums at www.pocuk.com . POCUK is the
Pajero Owners Club UK. Someone there should be able to help.
blue-python - 08 Jun 2004 08:40 GMT
Thank you but so far no one at pocuk has any idea! I have been on several
pocuk chat room and posted a request for help. It has so far been read by
over 165 people with not a single reply or suggestion.
Clearly the problem has to be with the fuel mixture but if the main Mitsi
dealer has no idea where do you turn? They just took ?50 off me for
reading ECU and waved me off! I have been calling Colt HQ Uk and they
never call me back even when they promise to find out what the 2 fault
codes mean. Rubbish service and frankly this has really put me off buying
another Pajero!
wemfish - 11 Jun 2004 13:07 GMT
Hi,
I cannot find your post on POCUK forum? can you post a link to it as I have
a similar problem with my Mitsubishi Delica 2.5TD
> Thank you but so far no one at pocuk has any idea! I have been on several
> pocuk chat room and posted a request for help. It has so far been read by
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> codes mean. Rubbish service and frankly this has really put me off buying
> another Pajero!
blue-python - 02 Aug 2004 17:29 GMT
Well over ?500 now spent with Main Mitsi dealer and they wrongly diagonosed
the problem! If you want a job done do it yourself! I have solved the
problem myself and hope that this information will help other 2.8 ltr
pajero / Shogun owners....... THE PROBLEM WAS........... CRANKSHAFT PULLEY
AND CRANK SENSOR!!!!! The pulley is mounted in rubber and that gave way,
resulting in pulley wobble at low RPM and ok at high RPM centrifugal force
etc, the wobble damaged the sensor and that is why at low RPM I had the
black smoke and yellow light. I have today fitted new pulley, back plate
and sensor (don't ask cost of the parts!!!!!) but dealer did get them next
day for me and a bit of discount.. Now I have the fun of trying to get a
refund on all that labour charges and parts that I did not fit...
So now you all know.... She goes like a new car now!
Cheerio
blue-python
Den - 03 Aug 2004 09:08 GMT
Hi Blue
Do you mind if I do ask the cost of the parts? and how easy was they to fit?
I don't have the problem now, but you never know ay?
Cheers mate
Den
> Well over ?500 now spent with Main Mitsi dealer and they wrongly diagonosed
> the problem! If you want a job done do it yourself! I have solved the
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> blue-python
blue-python - 02 Aug 2004 17:29 GMT
Well over ?500 now spent with Main Mitsi dealer and they wrongly diagonosed
the problem! If you want a job done do it yourself! I have solved the
problem myself and hope that this information will help other 2.8 ltr
pajero / Shogun owners....... THE PROBLEM WAS........... CRANKSHAFT PULLEY
AND CRANK SENSOR!!!!! The pulley is mounted in rubber and that gave way,
resulting in pulley wobble at low RPM and ok at high RPM centrifugal force
etc, the wobble damaged the sensor and that is why at low RPM I had the
black smoke and yellow light. I have today fitted new pulley, back plate
and sensor (don't ask cost of the parts!!!!!) but dealer did get them next
day for me and a bit of discount.. Now I have the fun of trying to get a
refund on all that labour charges and parts that I did not fit...
So now you all know.... She goes like a new car now!
Cheerio
blue-python
blue-python;1693521 Wrote:
> Hello
> I have a 1996 2.8 automatic Pajero with a problem. I have taken the ca
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> helping.. Best regards
> blue-python UK
Hi there, I live in new zealand and have exactly the same problem yo
are describing with yours. I know this is a long time after you firs
encountered the problem but i was wondering what you ended up doing t
remedy the problem
--
Javer
Message origin: www.TRAVEL.co
Henk - 13 Apr 2009 19:04 GMT
> blue-python;1693521 Wrote:
>> Hello
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> encountered the problem but i was wondering what you ended up doing to
> remedy the problem?
Hi,
I have a problem with a cold engine which dies after driving about 1 Km.
(Pajero 2,8TDi 1999)
I have discovered that pulling the handbrake, thus activating the warning
light, resolves this.
It takes a couple of seconds 5-10 after which the engine runs ok.
I have found this "workaround" while measuring, with a idle engine, to see
if the glowplugs are not stopping to soon.
(they did'nt)
The moment I wanted to drive away and thus pulling off the handbrake, the
idle speed dropped.
The idle speed went up again after pulling the handbrake.
Years ago I found out that the handbrake does something with a solenoid on
the fuelpump.
Let us know if it is the same with your car.
regards
Henk
The Netherlands
Javert - 21 Jun 2009 08:59 GMT
Javert;2934995 Wrote:
> Hi there, I live in new zealand and have exactly the same problem yo
> are describing with yours. I know this is a long time after you firs
> encountered the problem but I was wondering what you ended up doing t
> remedy the problem
Hi I have a 1996 Pajero 2.8 Diesel with the same problem. What I hav
done is to bypass the vacuum hose operated by the lowest servo valve o
the firewall, this opens and closes the second servo operating
butterfly valve on the intake hose
The vehicle works perfectly now and has not given any trouble. I a
not sure if the problem is with the vacuum line valve that has bee
bypassed or the computer that controls it. At first this did concer
me, but the car goes great now, all the time, so why does it matter.
The vacuum is still connected to the end servo but now it stays ope
all the time. What was happening before is that this servo would clos
like a choke on a petrol engine etc you know the rest
--
Javer
Message origin: www.TRAVEL.co