Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Nissan / Nissan Altima / May 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

'99-'01 Nissan Altima reliability

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Marcus - 22 Feb 2004 23:51 GMT
Hi,

I am looking to buy a '99-'01 Altima, and wonder which year offers better
reliability.  Are there known problems to look out for?

Thanks.

Marcus
NissTech - 23 Feb 2004 18:38 GMT
the reliability factor depends on the previous owners maintence habits.

If the previous owner beat the sh*t out if it and never serviced it then the
chances are it won't last to long.

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Marcus
Dannie - 23 Feb 2004 20:52 GMT
How True!!
dan
> the reliability factor depends on the previous owners maintence habits.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> >
> > Marcus
trhq - 24 Feb 2004 00:27 GMT
In my opinion , the latest model in the particular series (2001 2nd
generation altima, in this case) should be the least problematic since the
problems have been corrected on previous models, I hope.

Am quite satisfied with 2001 Altima GXE - but not as fuel efficient as
Camry.

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Marcus
Robin Zich - 04 Mar 2004 03:53 GMT
The Altima definitely lacks in gas mileage.  I've checked my mileage
consistintely on my '00 Altima and it does not even come close to the
mileage I got with an accord EX or camry LE, all with similar and engine
performance give or take 10 HP.  My '02 maxima is similar in the terrible
gas mileage area.

Even driving on the interstate with cruise control for 600 miles at 75 MPH
only yields about 22-24 MPG in either car.  Was getting close to30 with
previous accord and camry.

Robin
'00Altima SE
'02 Maxima SE 6-sp

> In my opinion , the latest model in the particular series (2001 2nd
> generation altima, in this case) should be the least problematic since the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> >
> > Marcus
JM - 04 Mar 2004 23:58 GMT
I have a 94 5 speed, and with 173,000 km on it I still get about 28 mpg
around the city, and I've seen as high as 37 or so on the highway.  I'm
fairly heavy-footed too ;)  As far as I know the 99-01 models have the same
engine save for different valve timing and so on, so I would expect the same
mileage more or less with all pre-02 models.

> The Altima definitely lacks in gas mileage.  I've checked my mileage
> consistintely on my '00 Altima and it does not even come close to the
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> > >
> > > Marcus
trhq - 05 Mar 2004 16:19 GMT
that's true for models with manual transmission.  different thing with
automatics.
can save more on gas if tires are oversized (but not recommended unless
modification on brakes are made - and speed meter gives slower reading than
actual).

one thing i like about altima has a well behaved engine - does not scream on
higher rpm like other 4-cyl engines.

tp

> I have a 94 5 speed, and with 173,000 km on it I still get about 28 mpg
> around the city, and I've seen as high as 37 or so on the highway.  I'm
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> > > >
> > > > Marcus
Orv - 05 Mar 2004 23:49 GMT
My '94 automaticAltima has consistently run around 25mpg commuting in San
Diego - about half and half freeway and surface streets, and around 29 on
extended freeway trips - 70mph with the A/C and Cruise.  In the last few
months, having just passed 100,000 miles, the in-town mileage has dropped
and the hydrocarbons are just under the legal limit for CA smog on a recent
test.  I'm guessing my Ox sensor is no longer up to the job and I will
probably see a check engine light in the near future(?).

> I have a 94 5 speed, and with 173,000 km on it I still get about 28 mpg
> around the city, and I've seen as high as 37 or so on the highway.  I'm
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> > > >
> > > > Marcus
Robin - 06 Mar 2004 00:44 GMT
I think you guys have some great engines if you are getting the MPG you
claim. You need at least 3-gas fill ups or your numbers are worthless.  I
typically use 5-gas fill ups to make my calculations.  More than 50% of my
driving in on the interstate averaging 65-75 MPH.

'94 Chevy S10 P/U extended cab, 4.3L, 5-speed, never got more than 23 MPG
with 5-gas fill ups.
'95 200SX 1.6L SE 5-speed, never got more than 32 MPG with 5-gas fill ups
'97 Maxima 3.0L SE 5-speed, never got more than 25 MPG with 5-gas fill ups
'00 Altima SE 2.4L 5-speed,never got more than 27 MPG with 5-gas fill ups
'02 Maxima 3.5L 02 5-speed, never get more than 22 MPG with 5-gas fill ups

I'll let you interpret the data for yourself.

my 5 cents

RZ

 I have never averaged more than 30 MPG with the 200SX,
> My '94 automaticAltima has consistently run around 25mpg commuting in San
> Diego - about half and half freeway and surface streets, and around 29 on
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> > > > >
> > > > > Marcus
David Rennick - 24 Feb 2004 04:56 GMT
CV axles flying apart for no reason.

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Marcus
NissTech - 24 Feb 2004 02:38 GMT
Ohhhhhhhh   right !!

Forgot about that one

NOT !!!!!

> CV axles flying apart for no reason.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> >
> > Marcus
David Rennick - 25 Feb 2004 05:25 GMT
Sure, you just want him to buy Nissan.  You don't care whether it flies
apart or not.

> Ohhhhhhhh   right !!
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> > >
> > > Marcus
NissTech - 25 Feb 2004 10:35 GMT
Your wrong again.

I could care less what this guy buys, he could get a Yugo for all I care

> Sure, you just want him to buy Nissan.  You don't care whether it flies
> apart or not.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> > > >
> > > > Marcus
The Lindbergh Baby - 24 Feb 2004 19:16 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Marcus

Might want to hike to the library to check some mag like consumer
reports--I believe they do a used car survey every so often--but to the
best of my knowledge no particular Altima year is significantly more or
less trouble-free than the others.  The A has consistently been a
low-trouble, easy-to-take-care-of car, as are the vast majority of
Japanese cars.  I imagine that's why we put up with their generally
uninspired and often derivative styling...because they're trouble free.
  ;-)

I think, as others have pointed out, the service history of the
particular auto you buy is much more important than the year.  Make sure
the owner/dealer gives you repair history, oil-change records,
yada-yada.  Test drive it thoroughly.  Take it to an independent
mechanic and have them give it the once-over, before you buy.  If the
owner/dealer is not willing to let you do that, look for another car.

My two cents.

John

Signature

To reply, remove "die.spammers" from address

Von Herzen, moge es wieder zu Herzen gehen.  --Beethoven

gforce - 20 May 2004 14:39 GMT
My sister in law has a 00 Altima.  Only problem has been a leaking intake
manifold gasket.  First signs were slight smoking (black) from running
rich when cold.  Eventually it started to run really rough to the point
that you'd have to put it in neutral when stopped at a light because it'd
surge.  It took me most of the weekend to replace - absolutely the worst
intake I've ever removed!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.