Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Nissan / Nissan Altima / January 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

92 maxima idling and jerky acceleration

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rusa - 13 Jan 2004 19:30 GMT
Hi all,

Recently my 92 maxima GXE idling speed suddenly dropped at the traffic
signal. It seems to not want to go back up any more. Further the
acceleration is jerky but seems to get better at higher speed.

I had changed my air filter with one from Autozone, a few days ago.
That's all. My car even passed the stringent emission test.

After reading this forum I gather that an aftermarket air filter can
damage the air flow meter, so I replaced the air filter again with a
Nissan dealer air filter.

The problem is still there. Could the AFM be damaged. I only drove the
car with the aftermarket air filter for five days. Anything else I can
look for.

Any simple tips to further diagnose will be much appreciated. I am not
much of a diy person for car repairs but I will try.

Thanks,

Rusa
Rusa - 13 Jan 2004 23:55 GMT
Hi all,
Just wanted to clarify, "jerky acceleration". It is as if the car has
a sore throat while accelerating. The acceleration is pulsating and
not smooth.

Also, I dont have a problem starting the car.

Thanks again for any advice.

Rusa

> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Rusa
Peter Hill - 14 Jan 2004 00:00 GMT
>Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>damage the air flow meter, so I replaced the air filter again with a
>Nissan dealer air filter.

Most unlikely for an air filter to do any damage, it may allow small
particles though which could cause more wear over 10's of thousands of
miles, it may clog quicker or be more restrictive to begin with in
which case you lose a bit of power at high revs.

>The problem is still there. Could the AFM be damaged. I only drove the
>car with the aftermarket air filter for five days. Anything else I can
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Rusa

Check the AFM connector is properly connected and the inlet duct has
no leaks.  It it's a flat rectangular panel filter check you put it in
the right way up.

There do seem to be some claims that using carb cleaner to clean any
lint or dust off the hot wire that can be seen in the small hole off
to one side in the AFM works wonders.  I would not advise any attempt
at removal of the hot wire module from it's alloy body.  NissTech says
it should be heated after switch off to burn off any deposits but I
can't find any mention of this in a '91 200SX turbo RS13 Nissan
workshop manual or the supplement.  Nor in the later '94 200SX S14
turbo manual, the bottom line in that manual says check the hot wire
for damage or dust.  If it was supposed to burn off by some means
there would be a fault finding guide to whatever had gone wrong with
that system to allow the accumulation of dust.

--
Peter Hill
Spamtrap reply domain as per NNTP-Posting-Host in header
Can of worms - what every fisherman wants.
Can of worms - what every PC owner gets!
Steve - 14 Jan 2004 01:36 GMT
>>After reading this forum I gather that an aftermarket air filter can
>>damage the air flow meter, so I replaced the air filter again with a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> miles, it may clog quicker or be more restrictive to begin with in
> which case you lose a bit of power at high revs.

snip.

> There do seem to be some claims that using carb cleaner to clean any
> lint or dust off the hot wire that can be seen in the small hole off
> to one side in the AFM works wonders.

So if his crap on the wire causes problems, why wouldn't a crappy air filter
allow too much crap to get onto the wire and ruin the meter?

I've seen a BUNCH of AFM's ruined from cheap airfilters and wouldn't be
shocked if this one was ruined as well.

Signature


 Steve

http://www.atlantaracing.com

Peter Hill - 14 Jan 2004 20:55 GMT
>>>After reading this forum I gather that an aftermarket air filter can
>>>damage the air flow meter, so I replaced the air filter again with a
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>I've seen a BUNCH of AFM's ruined from cheap airfilters and wouldn't be
>shocked if this one was ruined as well.

and how many AFM's and other expensive electronic items have been
junked to no effect, with the poor sap of a customer picking up the
bill for the shops inablity to properly test and diagnose a fault?
How often do I see someone posting to alt.autos.nissan with a tale of
woe that some shop has charged them for the replacement of $100's of
parts and still not fixed the fault?

--
Peter Hill
Spamtrap reply domain as per NNTP-Posting-Host in header
Can of worms - what every fisherman wants.
Can of worms - what every PC owner gets!
Steve - 15 Jan 2004 03:57 GMT
>>>>After reading this forum I gather that an aftermarket air filter can
>>>>damage the air flow meter, so I replaced the air filter again with a
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> junked to no effect, with the poor sap of a customer picking up the
> bill for the shops inablity to properly test and diagnose a fault?

Given the shop manual test for an questionable AFM is "replace with known
good unit", how is that a faulty way to test it? The shop manual test and
codes only works with a totally dead meter. I've seen dozens (if not
hundreds) that pass the basic test in the shop manual (blow through the
meter and watch for a voltage change) and set no code yet were -the-
problem with the car.

> How often do I see someone posting to alt.autos.nissan with a tale of
> woe that some shop has charged them for the replacement of $100's of
> parts and still not fixed the fault?

So? If I use a known good AFM to test a car and it doesn't fix the problem,
the old one goes back on and I move onto something else. If some other shop
just leaves every part the suspect on a car, they are butchers. That isn't
how I work.

It's like a bad ECU, the ONLY test for a flakey ECU is to replace it with a
known good one. So you're saying if the ECU might be flakey and there is no
test, it shouldn't ever be replaced?
Signature


 Steve

http://www.atlantaracing.com

Steve - 14 Jan 2004 01:33 GMT
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> The problem is still there. Could the AFM be damaged.

Yep, the symtoms you describe sound like AFM problems, hope you saved ~$500
on that air filter :-)

Any other junky tuneup parts on the car? That's where I'd start...

Signature


 Steve

http://www.atlantaracing.com

Papa Ray - 14 Jan 2004 01:58 GMT
Go to autozone and see if they will see if your ECCU (computer) has
any codes that relate to this problem. If there are none I would take
it to a shop for a diagnosis. There are several sensor circuits that
have to do with the Idle. One being the sensor that tells the ECCU how
hot the engine is for example. All will affect the idle.

I am assuming that when you replaced the filter the first time you
didn't pull and hoses or wires off.
It could be assocated with the filter change or it could be something
else decided to malfunction.

When you take it in, choose a shop that is modern, fairly large and is
known to have been around for several years. Ask your friends if the
have one to recommend.

Sorry but without codes its a crapshoot as to what signal is messed
up. Even then it might not be the sensor itself but a bad connection
or a bad ground somewhere. Or you might have got a bad tank of gas or
something not even related to the filter.

Pappa Ray
Rusa - 14 Jan 2004 13:59 GMT
Thanks all !  No, the check engine light does not come on. I havent
changed any ignition-related parts on this car - spark plugs,
distributor cap etc. I did not pull any hoses or wires.

My car has 100K miles. I don't want to believe it was caused by the
air-filter change since I had the aftermarket (STP) air-filter on for
only 4-5 days before the problem started. I am guessing it is
unrelated to the air-filter change. The way I understood the AFM
damage was it was a gradual process? Any other way to determine it is
the AFM. I read in this newsgroup that AFM damage will cause the RPM
to cap off at 2K or so. I am hoping I can try to pull the trouble
codes myself by using some of the other postings on this newsgroup

Rusa

> Go to autozone and see if they will see if your ECCU (computer) has
> any codes that relate to this problem. If there are none I would take
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Pappa Ray
Steve - 15 Jan 2004 03:51 GMT
> Thanks all !  No, the check engine light does not come on. I havent
> changed any ignition-related parts on this car - spark plugs,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> unrelated to the air-filter change. The way I understood the AFM
> damage was it was a gradual process?

Nope, throw a hand full of dirt into one and it's a done deal. ;-)

Maybe it was close to the end and this filter finished it off?

> Any other way to determine it is
> the AFM. I read in this newsgroup that AFM damage will cause the RPM
> to cap off at 2K or so.

That's only if it's -totally- dead i.e. no signal whatsoever.

One thing you can try, see how it runs with it unplugged. If it idles good,
my money is on the AFM.
Signature


 Steve

http://www.atlantaracing.com

Rusa - 16 Jan 2004 00:29 GMT
> > Thanks all !  No, the check engine light does not come on. I havent
> > changed any ignition-related parts on this car - spark plugs,
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> One thing you can try, see how it runs with it unplugged. If it idles good,
> my money is on the AFM.

Any precautions in unplugging the AFM? I havent done it before. Do I
just pull the connector that plugs onto the AFM square box and then
start the car ?

I attempted to pull the ECU trouble codes. When I did the ECU
procedure, I got 5 long flashes. No short ones. That didnt make sense.
So, I attempted it again and no pulses, nada, the second time. I think
I followed the procedure correctly. i.e. Turn the ECU screw clockwise
to extreme position, wait 2 sec and then anticlockwise to original
position. Is this procedure correct?

I also read that a bad TPS can exhibit similar symptoms. Is there a
way to tell that it is the TPS and not the AFM or vice versa ?  I
could not locate the TPS. I used the picture at this link below but
couldnt locate it on my car. Is it placed differently on a 92 max than
the one in the diagram. Any other pointers to locate it. Sorry if this
is a dumb question
http://vbxmaxima.8m.com/tps.html

I am thinking of changing the distributor cap and rotor and see. Is
this a good idea ? At the very least, this is something cheap that I
think I can do before I down some big $$
Steve - 16 Jan 2004 08:24 GMT
>> > Thanks all !  No, the check engine light does not come on. I havent
>> > changed any ignition-related parts on this car - spark plugs,
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> just pull the connector that plugs onto the AFM square box and then
> start the car ?

Yep. It should only rev to 2200 but you should be able to tell if it idles
better etc.

> I also read that a bad TPS can exhibit similar symptoms. Is there a
> way to tell that it is the TPS and not the AFM or vice versa ?  

Simples tests in a good shop manual. All you need is a ohm meter.

> I am thinking of changing the distributor cap and rotor and see. Is
> this a good idea ?

Can't hurt and is pretty cheap. I'd be surprised if that does anything..

Good luck!
Signature


 Steve

http://www.atlantaracing.com

Peter Hill - 16 Jan 2004 19:18 GMT
>I attempted to pull the ECU trouble codes. When I did the ECU
>procedure, I got 5 long flashes. No short ones. That didnt make sense.
>So, I attempted it again and no pulses, nada, the second time. I think
>I followed the procedure correctly. i.e. Turn the ECU screw clockwise
>to extreme position, wait 2 sec and then anticlockwise to original
>position. Is this procedure correct?

How many LED's do see in the window next to the screw?

>I also read that a bad TPS can exhibit similar symptoms. Is there a
>way to tell that it is the TPS and not the AFM or vice versa ?  I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>is a dumb question
>http://vbxmaxima.8m.com/tps.html

It's on the other end of throttle shaft to the end with the quadrant
plates and throttle cables.  Early ones are rectangular with one three
pin connector facing forwards for the idle / wide open switch and a
well hidden lead coming out of the bottom to a connector for the TPS
variable resistor.  Just check the idle switch makes and breaks on
closing / opening the throttle using a meter in continuity mode on the
top two pins off the forward facing connector, V+ on the middle pin.
If you don't get continuity when the throttle is closed moving the
switch body until you do.  On the TPS connector, pull the boot back so
you can insert a thin wire into the back of the connector to make
contact with the center pin, connect a voltmeter (analog pointer type
is best 10 or 12v) to this wire and earth.  Switch the ignition on and
check you get between 0.5 (idle) and 4 volts this should be a smooth
variation with no spikes or sudden drop offs as you open the throttle.

>I am thinking of changing the distributor cap and rotor and see. Is
>this a good idea ? At the very least, this is something cheap that I
>think I can do before I down some big $$

I doubt it.  The OEM Jap leads and cap are the best you can get.  Only
at very high mileage when the pickups in the cap are eroded hollow is
it going to need replacing.

--
Peter Hill
Spamtrap reply domain as per NNTP-Posting-Host in header
Can of worms - what every fisherman wants.
Can of worms - what every PC owner gets!
Steve - 17 Jan 2004 03:58 GMT
> I doubt it.  The OEM Jap leads and cap are the best you can get.  Only
> at very high mileage when the pickups in the cap are eroded hollow is
> it going to need replacing.

Or burns through. Seen a few "leak" through to ground, especially the rotor
button to the dist shaft. But his problem doesn't sound like a cap/rotor.

Signature


 Steve

http://www.atlantaracing.com

Rusa - 17 Jan 2004 19:58 GMT
Sorry for my late responses. I use deja server and it takes 3-9 hrs
for my post to appear. I dont know if there is a faster way. My ISP
does not provided newsgroup access...

> >I attempted to pull the ECU trouble codes. When I did the ECU
> >procedure, I got 5 long flashes. No short ones. That didnt make sense.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> How many LED's do see in the window next to the screw?

I got hold of a Chiltons and followed the procedure mentioned. I think
I got the procedure correct this time
Diagnostic Mode 3 - flashes 5 red and 5 green = 55 (no trouble)
Mode 4 and 5 also showed no problems.

Changed distributor cap and rotor - it did not fix the problem. There
is still lack of a healthy idle. But once I get the car in motion the
problem is not noticeable.

I am still holding off on the AFM test since both mode 3 and mode 5
did not indicate any problem with AFM.

Chilton's says that the injectors cannot be diagnosed using the ECU
for Non-California models. I wanted to try the resistance test for the
injectors but I cant seem to locate them easily from the Chilton's
diagram. Are they near the spark plugs area. Any pointers ? This is
the first time I am working on a car myself !! I am happy to be making
some progress though..

> >I also read that a bad TPS can exhibit similar symptoms. Is there a
> >way to tell that it is the TPS and not the AFM or vice versa ?  I
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> check you get between 0.5 (idle) and 4 volts this should be a smooth
> variation with no spikes or sudden drop offs as you open the throttle.

I will try this. Thanks Peter!

> >I am thinking of changing the distributor cap and rotor and see. Is
> >this a good idea ? At the very least, this is something cheap that I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> at very high mileage when the pickups in the cap are eroded hollow is
> it going to need replacing.
Steve - 17 Jan 2004 23:01 GMT
> I got hold of a Chiltons and followed the procedure mentioned. I think
> I got the procedure correct this time
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I am still holding off on the AFM test since both mode 3 and mode 5
> did not indicate any problem with AFM.

It won't set a code unless the meter is -totally- dead i.e. in 2200rpm rev
limiter mode. I've replaced tons of them that never set a code but caused
the car to run poorly.

> Chilton's says that the injectors cannot be diagnosed using the ECU
> for Non-California models. I wanted to try the resistance test for the
> injectors but I cant seem to locate them easily from the Chilton's
> diagram.

That isn't going to cause your problem.

Signature


 Steve

http://www.atlantaracing.com

Rusa - 18 Jan 2004 15:00 GMT
> > I got hold of a Chiltons and followed the procedure mentioned. I think
> > I got the procedure correct this time
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> limiter mode. I've replaced tons of them that never set a code but caused
> the car to run poorly.

Thanks. I will try the AFM test then. I noticed that the car does rev
past 2200 rpm (about 3K rmp) during normal driving, in the lower
gears.

> > Chilton's says that the injectors cannot be diagnosed using the ECU
> > for Non-California models. I wanted to try the resistance test for the
> > injectors but I cant seem to locate them easily from the Chilton's
> > diagram.
>
> That isn't going to cause your problem.
Rusa - 18 Jan 2004 15:03 GMT
> It won't set a code unless the meter is -totally- dead i.e. in 2200rpm rev
> limiter mode. I've replaced tons of them that never set a code but caused
> the car to run poorly.

Are there any do's and don'ts on the AFM replacement. Dealer parts
only or aftermarket ok ?
Steve - 20 Jan 2004 07:41 GMT
>> It won't set a code unless the meter is -totally- dead i.e. in 2200rpm
>> rev limiter mode. I've replaced tons of them that never set a code but
>> caused the car to run poorly.
>
> Are there any do's and don'ts on the AFM replacement. Dealer parts
> only or aftermarket ok ?

The python AFM's seem to work fairly well. I'd say they perform about 95% of
what a new Nissan one will.
Signature


 Steve

http://www.atlantaracing.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.