I have not reached the mileage for a belt replacement. Should I replace it
anyway because of the time between the last change which is about 3 years?
On 5/24/04 6:00 AM, in article 3YidnV4E99ZcSCzdRVn-ug@comcast.com, "Secret
Agentman" <grubworm.comcast.net> wrote:
> I have not reached the mileage for a belt replacement. Should I replace it
> anyway because of the time between the last change which is about 3 years?
Check the maintenance schedules in the owner's manual. Three years seems a
little too soon if you haven't reached the mileage either.
Steve T - 24 May 2004 15:50 GMT
> On 5/24/04 6:00 AM, in article 3YidnV4E99ZcSCzdRVn-ug@comcast.com, "Secret
> Agentman" <grubworm.comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> I have not reached the mileage for a belt replacement. Should I replace
>> it anyway because of the time between the last change which is about 3
>> years?
3 years isn't a problem. I don't really start to worry time wise until
about 8-10 years. Most people never exceed the time before the mileage
becomes the issue.

Signature
Steve
http://www.atlantaracing.com
it should be replace after 5 years or 60,000 miles , whichever comes first
> I have not reached the mileage for a belt replacement. Should I replace it
> anyway because of the time between the last change which is about 3 years?