Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Nissan / Nissan Maxima / October 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Help with Tire Sizing please, 2002 SE Tires on 2002 GLE Rims

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Pat@Boston.Harbor - 14 Sep 2004 11:58 GMT
A 2002 GLE takes 215/55R-17s
A 2002 SE takes 225/50R-17s
GLE Rims are 7" wide, not sure about the SE rims.

As the selection of tires for the GLE is poor, I am looking for
comments/advice if I were to use the SE's larger tires.

By my calculation, the tire would be about 1/2" taller and the axle
will be about 1/4" higher off the ground.  I assume the speedometer
slowdown would be minimal, but I am most concerned with the rim width
fit of the GLE vs. the SE tires.

Thanks for your input!
Pat
David Geesaman - 14 Sep 2004 14:47 GMT
Adding 10mm width is a common practice.  225/55R17s are the better
alternative size, but 225/50R17 shouldn't cause much speedo error.  Just be
sure you don't run the tires on too low on pressure since the oversized
width is slightly more susceptible to underinflation damage.

Dave

> A 2002 GLE takes 215/55R-17s
> A 2002 SE takes 225/50R-17s
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Thanks for your input!
> Pat
Pat@Boston.Harbor - 15 Sep 2004 04:14 GMT
Thanks Dave.
I found a specs page at Tirerack.com with more detail than I had
before..   the 225/55's are actually another inch taller in diameter
than the 225/50s, which are already taller than my original 215/55s.
I'm going to go with the 225/50s as they are closest in diameter,
while still being 10mm wider.

Pat

>Adding 10mm width is a common practice.  225/55R17s are the better
>alternative size, but 225/50R17 shouldn't cause much speedo error.  Just be
>sure you don't run the tires on too low on pressure since the oversized
>width is slightly more susceptible to underinflation damage.
>
>Dave
David Geesaman - 15 Sep 2004 12:57 GMT
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html helped me to figure this out:

215x55R17 has a diameter of 82.7".  225x50R17 has 81.2" (-1.8%) and
225x55R17 has 84.0 (+1.6%).  In either case, you're looking at a speedo
error of 1mph at 70mph, not a big deal.

I would go with the size that offers the most options and best prices, but
really it's almost a wash - they are both about the same.

Dave

> Thanks Dave.
> I found a specs page at Tirerack.com with more detail than I had
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> >
> >Dave
Pat@Boston.Harbor - 03 Oct 2004 14:33 GMT
Dave,

I wound up ordering the first size you recommended (225/55/17).
Decided on 55s over the 50s for a couple of reasons, including larger
circumference (might help my already poor gas mileage a bit), and also
because I'd rather have more rubber/air between the rim and the road.

Last night I drove 30 miles of highway in the rain.. white knuckle
doing 45-60mph on my Bridgestones.. same scary ride as my previous Max
with the same tires, and these fronts still have plenty of tread!
I'm tired of it!  Looking forward to the Michelin Pilot A/S.

Thanks again to all for the advice
Pat

>Adding 10mm width is a common practice.  225/55R17s are the better
>alternative size, but 225/50R17 shouldn't cause much speedo error.  Just be
>sure you don't run the tires on too low on pressure since the oversized
>width is slightly more susceptible to underinflation damage.
maxima1 - 15 Sep 2004 15:25 GMT
> GLE Rims are 7" wide, not sure about the SE rims.

SE rims are 7-inch width as well, which is fine for 225/50-17.

Matthew
Pat@Boston.Harbor - 16 Sep 2004 00:31 GMT
I found meaningful specs at tirerack:

Bridgestone Turanzas (stock on my 2002 GLE)
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/Spec.jsp?make=Bridgestone&model=Turanza+EL42
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/Spec.jsp?make=Michelin&model=Pilot+Sport+A%2FS&veh
icleSearch=true&partnum=25WR7SPORTAS


Bridgestones:    215/55    26.3" tall    779 revs per mile
Michelins:    225/55    27.1" tall (+0.8)    764 rpm (-15)
        225/50    26.1" tall (-0.2)    795 rpm (+16)
        235/50    26.6" tall (+0.3)    777 rpm (-2)

After looking it over I guess I have a few choices after all, and they
are ok for use with a 7" rim.  The 235s are looking good from an
odometer perspective (I know its negligible) but I like the wider tire
look too..

So now I'm wondering how much wet / snow traction would I LOSE by
adding 20mm of width????  Is 20mm negligible here?

Thanks again for the comments..  if anyone learns anything from this
thread, it is that there ARE other tires out there if you deviate a
little.  Tirerack shows what rim widths are good with each tire size.

Pat
David Geesaman - 16 Sep 2004 13:11 GMT
> After looking it over I guess I have a few choices after all, and they
> are ok for use with a 7" rim.  The 235s are looking good from an
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> So now I'm wondering how much wet / snow traction would I LOSE by
> adding 20mm of width????  Is 20mm negligible here?

   I know 10mm is no big deal, but 20mm makes me a little nervous.  Someone
with more experience is free to correct me, but at +20 I suspect it can
affect the durability of the bead and the flex in the sidewall could cause
uneven wear.  You definitely won't want to run +20s low on air since that
would be extra hard on them.

   I suggest you call them and ask - but since the Pilot Sport A/S comes in
a better fitting size, I'd go with the 225/50 R17.  The extra 1mph gets lost
real quick in rolling (actual) diameter variances due to vehicle weight and
speedometer error.

   Dave
maxima1 - 16 Sep 2004 13:22 GMT
> So now I'm wondering how much wet / snow traction would I LOSE by
> adding 20mm of width????  Is 20mm negligible here?

Wide tires suck in the wet or snow, and putting 235's on 7-inch rims
will make the car feel sloppy in any weather. I have 235's on another
car, and they are banana peels when wet. In fact, I can't even take
that car (a BMW 528) out of the garage in the snow on those tires
If you live anywhere it snows, you'd be amazed at the performance of
winter tires. I use a set of 15-inch Michelin Alpins from Dec-March,
and it is well worth the investment. The car pulls like a tractor and
I can actually pass snow plows on the back roads.
Buy some low-cost winter tires, and then you can use anything you want
for the summer months. And you'll save your expensive alloy rims from
winter salt as well.

Matthew
01 Maxima SE (15inch Michelin Alpin winter tires)
00 BMW 528 Sport (16inch Bridgestone Blizzak winter tires)
Pat@Boston.Harbor - 17 Sep 2004 12:04 GMT
I'll agree with you both and get the 225/50s..

I know having 2 sets of tires/wheels would be preferred, but there are
so many days when the roads are dry during the winter that I think
all-seasons are good enough for me.  That, and my garage is already
crammed full of junk!

Thanks to all for the feedback, it is much appreciated.
Pat
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.