Hello,
Thanks to all who responded to my "longevity" question.
I'm looking at a 98 GXE with 90000 miles, but it's a bit more than I
want to spend ($8000 before any haggling).
A 95 model would be closer to my price range.
Assuming that I can find a 95 with *decent* milage, is there any
reason NOT to get one?
What might the pros and cons of either model year be?
TIA
...
Dave Stone - 30 Mar 2005 17:31 GMT
noneyabusiness <me@you.com> wrote in news:jmqk41pvnkh9537pqqi5ccbvn471pvsdbr@
4ax.com:
> Hello,
> Thanks to all who responded to my "longevity" question.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> ...
The 97+ model had some structural changes made to the bumpers to make them
stronger (see pics in the link below). This also made it a little heavier than
the 95-96 Maxima. If you are buying one I would also consider an Infiniti I30
which is a rebadged Maxima.
http://www.hwysafety.org/vehicle_ratings/ce/html/97024.htm
http://auto.consumerguide.com/auto/used/reviews/full/index.cfm/id/2214/
noneyabusiness - 30 Mar 2005 21:01 GMT
>noneyabusiness <me@you.com> wrote in news:jmqk41pvnkh9537pqqi5ccbvn471pvsdbr@
>4ax.com:
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
>http://auto.consumerguide.com/auto/used/reviews/full/index.cfm/id/2214/
Is there any reason to pay the premium for the upscale badging?
...
E. Meyer - 30 Mar 2005 21:24 GMT
On 3/30/05 2:01 PM, in article b11m41dhssv5tnqf22jghnebo3623b78hb@4ax.com,
>> noneyabusiness <me@you.com> wrote in news:jmqk41pvnkh9537pqqi5ccbvn471pvsdbr@
>> 4ax.com:
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> ...
I believe you will find that by now there is no premium.
jmattis@attglobal.net - 31 Mar 2005 00:23 GMT
> > Is there any reason to pay the premium for the upscale badging?
> >
> > ...
>
> I believe you will find that by now there is no premium.
That's mostly true, the premium is not very large any more. Boo-hoo
for me. But the '96 was the first year for the I30, so it isn't
directly comparable to the purchase of a '95 Max.
The I30's have significantly better paint, on average. Also has speed
sensitive steering that made it into the Max by '98 or so. And 100
pounds more sound insulation than the Max. And longer overhangs, which
slightly reduces handling. The Infiniti may have received better
maintenance. Then again....
The '99 Max is just as good as the rest of that generation, IMO,
despite what another poster said. It's the 2000 and newer that dropped
the ball in reliability. That's why I didn't even consider another I35
purchase.
Oh yeah, the '95 and '96 Max, and the '96 I30, have slightly noisier
valves than the later 3 liter engines. Nissan made some change
designed to provide a quieter idle.
Roadraging - 31 Mar 2005 01:11 GMT
> > > Is there any reason to pay the premium for the upscale badging?
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> the ball in reliability. That's why I didn't even consider another I35
> purchase.
In 1999 Nissan dropped the Galv.metal coating that the 1998 had it's not a
real great item but it was a change and not for the better.
=============================
> Oh yeah, the '95 and '96 Max, and the '96 I30, have slightly noisier
> valves than the later 3 liter engines. Nissan made some change
> designed to provide a quieter idle.
Dave Stone - 30 Mar 2005 23:57 GMT
>>The 97+ model had some structural changes made to the bumpers to make
>>them stronger (see pics in the link below). This also made it a little
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> ...
By now that premium is pretty slim, if any. But it should help expand your
range of potential cars to buy.
Codifus - 30 Mar 2005 17:59 GMT
> Hello,
> Thanks to all who responded to my "longevity" question.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> ...
The 95 has a cheesy rear bunmper that will sustain expensive damage from
even a 5 mph bump. That was fixed in the 97+ Maximas.
Other than that, the 98s have minor cosmetic changes like: a digital
odometer, mroe symmetrical gauges (fuel and temp face each other).
Better designed cup holders etc.
If I had to choose bewteen a 98 eith 90K miles and a 95 with 90K miles,
I would go for the 98 because it's simply younger, and since it has high
miles from fewer years, that would suggest that it spent more of its
time on the highway, and highway driving has less wear and tear on a car
than city driving.
CD
noneyabusiness - 30 Mar 2005 20:58 GMT
>> Hello,
>> Thanks to all who responded to my "longevity" question.
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
>CD
Good point...thanks.
Roadraging - 30 Mar 2005 18:03 GMT
> Hello,
> Thanks to all who responded to my "longevity" question.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> ...
I bought my 98 SE new but having another car and a truck it only has
11,600 miles as of today. But it's been a real dream to own and drive.
Nissan had a recall on the Alternator dealer replaced it quickly at no
charge. I also replaced the battery years ago. Besides this not a thing
has ever gone wrong. I feel the 98s were the last real good Maximas
since Nissan came under new ownership.
Buggy21 - 26 Apr 2005 20:51 GMT
> Hello,
> Thanks to all who responded to my "longevity" question.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> ...