This is my second Maxima. Love the acceleration and with Michelin tires
good handling. But the long turning radius would keep me from getting a
new one. Have they improved in 06 or 07?
> This is my second Maxima. Love the acceleration and with Michelin
> tires good handling. But the long turning radius would keep me
> from getting a new one. Have they improved in 06 or 07?
I know they didn't in 06. I have the old 'give me 40 acres and I'll
turn this rig around' kind of thing with my 2006 ;-) Actually it isn't
bad unless you are un a tight parking lot. It IS a lot wider turning
than my Supra was though
> This is my second Maxima. Love the acceleration and with Michelin tires
> good handling. But the long turning radius would keep me from getting a
> new one. Have they improved in 06 or 07?
It isn't the car's fault. It's the tires & the lack of fender
clearance.
When you put 16, 17, 18 inch tires on the car (as the trend is these
days), the turn radius just goes up and up.
Back in '94 my I30t had 15 inch tires and turned great. It was one of
the reasons that I bought the car.
E Meyer - 03 Jan 2007 02:47 GMT
On 1/2/07 6:12 PM, in article
1167783150.081898.90720@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com, "jmattis@attglobal.net"
>> This is my second Maxima. Love the acceleration and with Michelin tires
>> good handling. But the long turning radius would keep me from getting a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Back in '94 my I30t had 15 inch tires and turned great. It was one of
> the reasons that I bought the car.
Where did you get an I30t in '94? They didn't make them until '96.
jmattis@attglobal.net - 10 Jan 2007 00:36 GMT
> Where did you get an I30t in '94? They didn't make them until '96.
It was a '96 I30t, the first year that they came out (and they were
blocked from being imported for a short while by the Clinton
Administration along with some other Jap cars).
Normally i wouldn't buy a first-year model, but they'd already been
making the new maxima for a year.
Sorry for the confusion.
codifus@optonline.net - 03 Jan 2007 12:37 GMT
> > This is my second Maxima. Love the acceleration and with Michelin tires
> > good handling. But the long turning radius would keep me from getting a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Back in '94 my I30t had 15 inch tires and turned great. It was one of
> the reasons that I bought the car.
It's not the rims that determine the turning radius, but the torque of
the motor. Pushing 255+ HP through the front whels in a turn stresses a
CV joint like you won't beleive.
CD
common_ sense@netscape.com - 04 Jan 2007 23:51 GMT
>> > This is my second Maxima. Love the acceleration and with Michelin tires
>> > good handling. But the long turning radius would keep me from getting a
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>CD
torque has nothing to do with it,,??????
Its strictly a function of the tire tire radius, on a fixed platform.
My 2000 SE has the same turning radius issue with 17 inch tires.
mike w - 06 Jan 2007 01:54 GMT
>>>>This is my second Maxima. Love the acceleration and with Michelin tires
>>>>good handling. But the long turning radius would keep me from getting a
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> My 2000 SE has the same turning radius issue with 17 inch tires.
So, I am not alone. I just got my 2000 SE, and am amazed at how large
the turning radius is compared to my 90 GXE. I also have the 17" wheels.
But... I am still trying to rationalize this in my mind. Why would the
size of the wheel make a difference? And, the 17" tires are barely wider
than the 16" ones. Something doesn't add up...
Any other input?
-mike
JS - 06 Jan 2007 14:12 GMT
I don't believe the diameter of the tires are as impacting on turning
radius as the gear box that translates steering wheel turn into actual
wheel pivot. How much the wheels are allowed to pivot, the distance
between the front wheels, and the car's wheelbase are the main
factors.
The Nissan Maxima that I currently own requires a lot of thought
in parking lots as it won't make sharp turns. Conversely, I have a SUV
that will turn on a dime. I wish the Maxima was as nimble.
John in 61 degree Manchester, NH
Al Moodie - 09 Jan 2007 14:22 GMT
>I don't believe the diameter of the tires are as impacting on turning
>radius as the gear box that translates steering wheel turn into actual
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>John in 61 degree Manchester, NH
It is the diameter of the wheel/tire combination that is the limiting
factor. The greater the wheel/tire diameter the sooner the tire fouls
on the bodywork when you turn full lock.
On my 2003 there are mechanical limiters (bump stops) to prevent the
wheel/tire turning to the extent they foul the bodywork. Without these
limiters the wheel/tires could be turned further and would rub on the
bodywork on the engine side. This probably comes about because the
frame was originally designed for 15" or 16" wheels.
Al Moodie.
common_ sense@netscape.com - 07 Jan 2007 02:02 GMT
>>>>>This is my second Maxima. Love the acceleration and with Michelin tires
>>>>>good handling. But the long turning radius would keep me from getting a
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
>-mike
Its not the width, its the diameter - they are larger in diameter,
thus take longer to roll a certian distance.