Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Nissan / Nissan Maxima / January 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Maxima 2000:  can new muffler cut MPG by 3-4??

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
pgg - 02 Jan 2008 17:20 GMT
A couple months ago, my 2000 Maxima with 68,000 miles start making
terrible clunking noises from the muffler area.

My head wasn't on straight that day and I took it over to Meineke.  A pipe
was rusted out and hanging...they said even though the original stainless
steel muffler was fine, they had to replace the muffler to replace the
connecting pipe.  I said "fine".

I know...dumb move in hindsight and I wish I would have taken it elsewhere.

Well the Meineke muffler was $220 or something like that and looks/works
fine.

However I swear I get 3-4 MPG less than I used to.  Possible?  I also got
the MAF sensor replaced in the same time period...
dgeesaman@gmail.com - 02 Jan 2008 17:35 GMT
> A couple months ago, my 2000 Maxima with 68,000 miles start making
> terrible clunking noises from the muffler area.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> However I swear I get 3-4 MPG less than I used to.  Possible?  I also got
> the MAF sensor replaced in the same time period...

The muffler should have little/nothing to do with fuel economy.  The
MAF however can have a major impact.  Look to the MAF if you see
statistically significant change in mpg.
common_ sense@netscape.com - 03 Jan 2008 01:03 GMT
>> A couple months ago, my 2000 Maxima with 68,000 miles start making
>> terrible clunking noises from the muffler area.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>MAF however can have a major impact.  Look to the MAF if you see
>statistically significant change in mpg.

Not possible.

Also the Maxima has an all St Stl exhaust system - you should be
contacting your local BBB if Mienake replaced something "rusted". A
bracket may have broken/corroded, but not a pipe in the exhaust sytem.
pgg - 03 Jan 2008 01:21 GMT
> Not possible.
>
> Also the Maxima has an all St Stl exhaust system - you should be
> contacting your local BBB if Mienake replaced something "rusted". A
> bracket may have broken/corroded, but not a pipe in the exhaust sytem.

A bracket was indeed broken/corroded.  He made the claim that the broken
bracket somehow caused the pipe to be unusable.  

At the time I was stressed about other things in my life and didn't think.

This was a couple months ago...I doubt I can go back and get any
compensation.  I spent ~ 330 for the new muffler and service work
common_ sense@netscape.com - 04 Jan 2008 00:16 GMT
>> Not possible.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>This was a couple months ago...I doubt I can go back and get any
>compensation.  I spent ~ 330 for the new muffler and service work

the brackets are not Stainless Steel - you didn't say it was a bracket
in your original post.
pgg - 03 Jan 2008 01:22 GMT
> Not possible.

Also what is not possible?  The MAF affecting MPG or the exhaust affecting
MPG?
No One - 03 Jan 2008 03:02 GMT
>> Not possible.
>
> Also what is not possible?  The MAF affecting MPG or the exhaust
> affecting MPG?

You are replying to the class clown.  His dad owns a Nissan dealership
and he figures that gives him a clue.

Some good info here: http://forums.maxima.org/
common_ sense@netscape.com - 04 Jan 2008 00:14 GMT
>>> Not possible.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Some good info here: http://forums.maxima.org/

Must be a sad life - just sitting around stalking an obscure news
group - making none sense posts.
No One - 04 Jan 2008 03:22 GMT

> Must be a sad life - just sitting around stalking an obscure news
> group - making none sense posts.

That's what I figured.  When are you going to stop it?

Strange you didn't tell him it was because he didn't run premium.
common_ sense@netscape.com - 04 Jan 2008 00:15 GMT
>> Not possible.
>
>Also what is not possible?  The MAF affecting MPG or the exhaust affecting
>MPG?

the exhaust,,the MAF definitely could.
Devils Advocate - 03 Jan 2008 04:01 GMT
On Jan 2, 12:20 pm, pgg <papaNO_SP_AMgordygra...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> A couple months ago, my 2000 Maxima with 68,000 miles start making
> terrible clunking noises from the muffler area.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> However I swear I get 3-4 MPG less than I used to. Possible? I also got
> the MAF sensor replaced in the same time period...

The muffler should have little/nothing to do with fuel economy.  The
MAF however can have a major impact.  Look to the MAF if you see
statistically significant change in mpg.

What/where is  a maf sensor?

I own a 95 max that has poor fuel economy.
Did reg. tune up
AS - 03 Jan 2008 06:51 GMT
A muffler with the wrong size (capacity) or wrong diameter pipe will
affect more than fuel consumption, can even lead to engine overheating,
poor performance, etc.

Remember that for some engine conditions require back pressure in the
exhaust pipe and others require free flow.

> A couple months ago, my 2000 Maxima with 68,000 miles start making
> terrible clunking noises from the muffler area.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> However I swear I get 3-4 MPG less than I used to.  Possible?  I also got
> the MAF sensor replaced in the same time period...
dgeesaman@gmail.com - 03 Jan 2008 17:46 GMT
You do bring up a point I had thought about and disregarded.

An overly restrictive muffler or some other clog could definitely
reduce power.  But you will feel the loss in power, probably well
before you see a change in fuel economy.  The OP described loss in
fuel economy only.

As for too little restriction, these cars don't have issues (aside
from emissions legality and sound level) when running straight pipe
exhausts.  I believe the too little restriction thing is largely a
myth, in fact.

Dave

> A muffler with the wrong size (capacity) or wrong diameter pipe will
> affect more than fuel consumption, can even lead to engine overheating,
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
AS - 03 Jan 2008 19:08 GMT
There are systems that actually control the flow of gases in the muffler
to get the needed backpressure for some operating conditions.  Not in
the 2000 Maxima, that i know of.

> You do bring up a point I had thought about and disregarded.
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>>
>>- Show quoted text -
Codifus - 04 Jan 2008 04:04 GMT
> There are systems that actually control the flow of gases in the muffler
> to get the needed backpressure for some operating conditions.  Not in
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -

Yes, the 2000 thru 2002 Maxima have variable mufflers that "open up" at
higher RPMs.

My guess is it's the MAF change and the computer is still adjusting to it.

CD
AS - 04 Jan 2008 04:56 GMT
Thanks for the enlightenment

>> There are systems that actually control the flow of gases in the
>> muffler to get the needed backpressure for some operating conditions.  
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
>
> CD
George - 04 Jan 2008 23:13 GMT
To the OP, no. A new muffler/pipe, even is sized extremely small or
large, will not cause a 3-4 MPG change in fuel economy in a car that
gets 19-24 MPG. This is way too large a change for such a swap. There
are certain years of Max that have a stock muffler (stamped "Calsonic"
on my car) which has a flap that opens at 2,000 RPM or so. I have seen
this replaced on several Maximas with an open-style muffler with no
perceptible changes.

Look elsewhere in the car for your fuel economy issues.

BTW, fuel economy numbers are very erratic in the short term. Try to
average economy over multiple tanks to get a better MPG number. This
will even out any variations such as: batches of bad gas you might have
gotten, incorrect pump meters, city driving vs highway, ambient
temperature, etc. All of which can really vary your mileage.

> A couple months ago, my 2000 Maxima with 68,000 miles start making
> terrible clunking noises from the muffler area.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> However I swear I get 3-4 MPG less than I used to.  Possible?  I also got
> the MAF sensor replaced in the same time period...

A MAF sensor replaced, for a good one I assume, should only *improve*
mileage from a deficient number to the normal number. What mileage do
you get, exactly? A MAF bad enough to chop 3-4 MPG ought to throw a
check engine light.

Signature

Oil is always 15 years from running out, the oceans are always 10 years away
from rising 10 feet, and the internet always has only 3 years left before it
runs out of capacity. Color me skeptical.

88vette - 26 Jan 2008 14:00 GMT
No one has ask if the ECM was reprogramed when the MAF was changed.
Apparently the dealer needs to reprogram the ECM to match the MAF used.
Makes sense but MAFs in these cars really can cuase havick with runability
and a code that is thrown never indicates its the MAF. If your still low on
MPG give it a shot.

--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutautos.com/group/alt.autos.nissan.maxima/
More information at http://www.talkaboutautos.com/faq.html
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.