Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Nissan / Nissan Maxima / March 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Performance Mods

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Us - 22 Mar 2004 01:34 GMT
Thinking of adding a cold air intake and a aftermarket mass air flow sensor.
Anyone have a brand preference of know of the actual HP increase these two
will increase on my 2004 3.5 Maxima SE?

Thanks in advance
Meme - 22 Mar 2004 04:34 GMT
Don't bother.
A CAI is OK for more low rpm torque but will kill the power at high rpms.  A new
MAF won't make much difference until you bore and mod the whole intake/exhaust.

>Thinking of adding a cold air intake and a aftermarket mass air flow sensor.
>Anyone have a brand preference of know of the actual HP increase these two
>will increase on my 2004 3.5 Maxima SE?
>
>Thanks in advance
Codifus - 23 Mar 2004 03:42 GMT
> Don't bother.
> A CAI is OK for more low rpm torque but will kill the power at high rpms.  A new
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>
>>Thanks in advance

How will a CAI kill power at high RPMs?

CD
Steve T - 22 Mar 2004 23:45 GMT
>> Don't bother.
>> A CAI is OK for more low rpm torque but will kill the power at high rpms.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>
> How will a CAI kill power at high RPMs?

If the EFI isn't calibrated/can't deal with the change and leans out. I've
seen cars lose over a second 0-60 adding a CIA even though the owner will
swear it's faster cause the noise it makes!

Signature


Steve

http://www.atlantaracing.com

Greg Stewart - 23 Mar 2004 08:39 GMT
> If the EFI isn't calibrated/can't deal with the change and leans out. I've
> seen cars lose over a second 0-60 adding a CIA even though the owner will
> swear it's faster cause the noise it makes!

I guess that could be true with a car that uses a MAP sensor, but I think it
would be unlikely with a MAF sensor, they usually have a bit of head room..
Which is why the supercharger kit for the gen 4 could be used with the
factory MAF sensor.

Greg.
Steve T - 23 Mar 2004 21:13 GMT
>> If the EFI isn't calibrated/can't deal with the change and leans out.
>> I've seen cars lose over a second 0-60 adding a CIA even though the owner
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> it would be unlikely with a MAF sensor, they usually have a bit of head
> room..

True, map sensor cars are the worst. He asked how it could kill top end
power, leaning out is how it happens most of the time.
Signature


Steve

http://www.atlantaracing.com

Codifus - 24 Mar 2004 00:39 GMT
>>>Don't bother.
>>>A CAI is OK for more low rpm torque but will kill the power at high rpms.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> seen cars lose over a second 0-60 adding a CIA even though the owner will
> swear it's faster cause the noise it makes!

Yeah, that's possible, but I think slower 0-60 times may be more due to
the launch. With the stock intake, air flow is minimal at low vehicle
speeds, so the car doesn't really develop its full power. In my 98 SE
5-speed with the stock intake, 1st gear didn't feel all that powerful as
I thought it should, but as speed increased, the car seemed to get more
powerful in the higher gears. It seems to me that the engineers at
Nissan designed the intake to limit flow at low speeds so as to make the
car more easily tractable with throttle application. Now, enter the CAI.
1st gear is a monster, I floor the pedal at any rpms in 1st and the
wheels spin at will. I have to be very sensitive to throttle at low
speeds in 1st gear. As I go higher in the gears, the car is still
powerful, but you notice more of a gradual tapering off of power. The
stock intake really did a good job of making the car very linear in
power delivery, and the CAI just opened things up in my view. Not in a
bad way, mind you, you just have to adapt to it.

I would think that this situation would apply to the newer maximas as
well. The car is more powerful with a CAI, but its power delivery makes
it harder to put all that power to the wheels, especially in a FWD
configuration. And look, Nissan (and Acura's TL) have probably reached
the limit of how much power you can drive throught the front wheels.
Both cars suffer from significant torque steer.

CD
Steve T - 23 Mar 2004 21:11 GMT
> I would think that this situation would apply to the newer maximas as
> well.

It could but you asked how it could happen. Doing mods on a car for most of
us is a trial and error thing. Sometimes they help, sometimes they hurt.
The trick is not being fooled by noise etc into thinking the car is faster.

Signature


Steve

http://www.atlantaracing.com

Codifus - 24 Mar 2004 03:50 GMT
>>I would think that this situation would apply to the newer maximas as
>>well.
>
> It could but you asked how it could happen. Doing mods on a car for most of
> us is a trial and error thing. Sometimes they help, sometimes they hurt.
> The trick is not being fooled by noise etc into thinking the car is faster.

I wholeheartedly agree with you. That's why I did a dyno to backup what
I felt, and it did corroborate. Also, there was a thread on Maxima.org
discussing resonators. When you install an intake, most, if not all, of
the resonators are removed. By doing so, you tend to hurt mid-range
response, but still have better peak hp with an CAI or whatnot. Putting
back the resonator has shown to improve mid-range and also
change/decrease the sound of an aftermarket intake. So, ideally, an
aftermarket intake with the resonators left intact would be the best mod
to increase performance throughout the rev band. Also, the modest
increase in hp of an intake would follow the theory that the engine is a
pump, the more you get in has to matched with the more you get out. An
intake increases the air coming in, but you have to finish it off with
an exhaust mod to get more exhaust going out. That combination of intake
and exhaust will compliment each other very nicely.

CD
Jim - 23 Mar 2004 02:12 GMT
> Thinking of adding a cold air intake and a aftermarket mass air flow sensor.
> Anyone have a brand preference of know of the actual HP increase these two
> will increase on my 2004 3.5 Maxima SE?
>
> Thanks in advance

Waste of money. You *might* get 5HP at high RPM and a little low end
torque out of a CAI, but not enough to even feel it. The aftermarket MAF
sensor isn't going to do anything on a stock intake/exhaust system
(except increase your odds of related failures). It's a very well
designed drivetrain. Relax and enjoy it.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.