Hi. First post here so bear with me.
I've got a 1987 Nissan Pulsar N13 with a 1.6 carb engine and air con. I
don't have the air con on much but I have used it a few times.
I worked out today that I my fuel consumption is 11.15 litres per 100k,
which translates to 21 miles per gallon. I think my math is correct - the
actual figures were 437k travelled and 39.17 litres used.
If my calc is correct, isn't this extremely high? Any ideas what could be
the cause?
The car is Australian. In the UK the model is known as a Sunny.
willshak - 15 Feb 2005 16:40 GMT
On 2/15/2005 8:04 AM US(ET), Spammy Sammy took fingers to keys, and
typed the following:
>Hi. First post here so bear with me.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>actual figures were 437k travelled and 39.17 litres used.
>
Your figures translate more like 26.35 MPG.
My 85 Pulsar with the 1.6 L carb engine got between 35-37 MPG
My 93 1.6 litre FI Sentra 2 DR got about the same mileage.
>If my calc is correct, isn't this extremely high? Any ideas what could be
>the cause?
>
>The car is Australian. In the UK the model is known as a Sunny.
>
>

Signature
Bill
Spammy Sammy - 16 Feb 2005 08:45 GMT
> Your figures translate more like 26.35 MPG.
Still very high though isn't it.
Susan and Stephen - 17 Feb 2005 05:36 GMT
This model (Aussie model) does not have a carby it is actually fuel
injection.
When you are running you fuel down to empty are you waiting for the low fuel
light to come on???
> Hi. First post here so bear with me.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> The car is Australian. In the UK the model is known as a Sunny.
Spammy Sammy - 17 Feb 2005 13:05 GMT
> This model (Aussie model) does not have a carby it is actually fuel
> injection.
> When you are running you fuel down to empty are you waiting for the low fuel
> light to come on???
It has done, however I normally fill whenever it's a low price day.
I thought it was carb engine. Will be disappointed if I take the air filter
off and find a singlepoint injection module underneath.