Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Nissan / Nissan Cars / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

2005 Murano

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bill - 11 Apr 2005 14:35 GMT
Just purchased a 2005 Murano SL AWD and would like to know if using premium
grade gas is really necessary or will using regular be ok. Owner's manual
isn't very clear except to say that for best performance use high test,
won't be racing just city driving. Thanks
Jim Rojas - 11 Apr 2005 14:39 GMT
Any vehicle 1995+ needs premium. The car will start knocking if you put the
cheap stuff in.

Jim Rojas

> Just purchased a 2005 Murano SL AWD and would like to know if using
> premium grade gas is really necessary or will using regular be ok. Owner's
> manual isn't very clear except to say that for best performance use high
> test, won't be racing just city driving. Thanks
Rob Munach - 12 Apr 2005 12:13 GMT
> Any vehicle 1995+ needs premium. The car will start knocking if you put the
> cheap stuff in.

Huh?

> Jim Rojas
>
>>Just purchased a 2005 Murano SL AWD and would like to know if using
>>premium grade gas is really necessary or will using regular be ok. Owner's
>>manual isn't very clear except to say that for best performance use high
>>test, won't be racing just city driving. Thanks

Signature

Rob Munach, PE
Excel Engineering
PO Box 1264
Carrboro, NC 27510

WindsorFox[SS] - 19 Jun 2005 06:27 GMT
> Any vehicle 1995+ needs premium. The car will start knocking if you put the
> cheap stuff in.
>
> Jim Rojas

    Umm, where did you get that from?

Signature

"Network management is like trying to herd cats."
-- Unknown

"I wonder how much deeper the ocean would be without sponges?"
-- TazAmd - Humor Section Gettingtogather.com

Jim Rojas - 11 Apr 2005 14:40 GMT
BTW, nice choice of vehicle. I like the copper color myself.

Jim Rojas

> Just purchased a 2005 Murano SL AWD and would like to know if using
> premium grade gas is really necessary or will using regular be ok. Owner's
> manual isn't very clear except to say that for best performance use high
> test, won't be racing just city driving. Thanks
dalite01@bellsouth.net - 11 Apr 2005 18:46 GMT
You will probably get different responses on this.

However, join up at www.nissanmurano.org  (free).

This topic has been discussed in detail there, and test results provided.

Octane level is an indication of the anti-knock compounds present.  When it
is knocking, performance is de-rated, and the chance of missfire increases.
More misfire means more pollutants, less efficient operation and less power.

Short answer, higher octane level equals less knocking (as already
mentioned) and better gas mileage (as well as better performance).

> Just purchased a 2005 Murano SL AWD and would like to know if using
> premium grade gas is really necessary or will using regular be ok. Owner's
> manual isn't very clear except to say that for best performance use high
> test, won't be racing just city driving. Thanks
coryrhonda - 12 Apr 2005 04:37 GMT
> Short answer, higher octane level equals less knocking (as already
> mentioned) and better gas mileage (as well as better performance).

you are correct, but before everyone starts filling there trucks with
premium and not noticing any difference,  this is only true for a motor
designed to run on higher octane fuel, mostly the higher performance type.
SneakerFreak - 12 Apr 2005 12:24 GMT
On 4/11/05 9:35 AM, in article wZu6e.43968$UW6.26651@bignews5.bellsouth.net,

> Just purchased a 2005 Murano SL AWD and would like to know if using premium
> grade gas is really necessary or will using regular be ok. Owner's manual
> isn't very clear except to say that for best performance use high test,
> won't be racing just city driving. Thanks

If it's anything like my G35 (same engine), they "recommend Premium for the
best performance", but regular is OK.  However I used regular ONCE And you
could tell the difference - rougher idle, not as smooth, etc.  No thanks.
Rich - 12 Apr 2005 13:24 GMT
> Just purchased a 2005 Murano SL AWD and would like to know if using
> premium grade gas is really necessary or will using regular be ok. Owner's
> manual isn't very clear except to say that for best performance use high
> test, won't be racing just city driving. Thanks

You REALLY want to use premium with these engines.  Your mileage will be
better with premium, so the additional cost is offset..somewhat.  Seriously,
unless you want costly repair bills in the future, use premium.
Rob Munach - 12 Apr 2005 14:36 GMT
>>Just purchased a 2005 Murano SL AWD and would like to know if using
>>premium grade gas is really necessary or will using regular be ok. Owner's
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> better with premium, so the additional cost is offset..somewhat.  Seriously,
> unless you want costly repair bills in the future, use premium.

What basis do you have for that statement? Yes, the performance and
possibly the mileage will be better, however, it is unlikely a
manufacturer would design an engine to be damaged if premium is not
used. That is what a knock sensor is for.

Signature

Rob Munach, PE
Excel Engineering
PO Box 1264
Carrboro, NC 27510

dalite01@bellsouth.net - 12 Apr 2005 16:30 GMT
Not directed to me, but I will take a shot....

Knock = misfire
misfire = unburned fuel
unburned fuel = higher Catalytic Converter load

Knock = engine load until knock sensor de-rates performance (pulls timing,
adjusts fuel mixture, etc) = more computer timer ticks associated with
correcting an un-needed situation that could be devoted to other tasks in
the task manager.

I stand a fairly good chance of surviving the Flu or whatever virus is going
around.  However, that doesn't mean that I try to devote all of my time
trying to catch it.

Running regular on a system (engine, computer, firmware, software) that is
designed for optimum performance using premium  isn't exactly russian
roulette, but it does get the gun and the bullets together within close
proximity.

I don't think the manufacturer considers optimum performance the same way
that you may.  It is more likely that the term "optimim performance" to them
is a reference to the least amount of performance necessary to pass EPA
regulations consistently, and keep the engine and drivetrain together during
the awarranty period.

As an example, on a 2004 PT Cruiser GT, it is possible to go from 215HP to
245 HP by merely using more agressive computer firmware ("Calibration").
Absolutely no extra parts needed.  You merely swap out the PCM (computer)
and this only due to the dealer not being authorized to flash the stock one
with the performance "calibration" (new firmware).  If you buy the "Turbo
Lite (180 HP GT), the same firmware change takes it from 180HP to 245HP.

FWIW, that engine is good up to 800 HP with only a turbo change and more
agressive calibration.  From 800 HP to 1300 HP, the valve orientation has to
be changed.  So, in essence, a 215HP production car is capable to giving 245
HP to the consumer with computer changes, and up to 800 to the racer with
increased scroll area on the turbo, and computer change (possibly 10 to 20%
increase in injector flow) and up from 800 to 100 HP after cracking the head
bolts (for the first time) and changing the valve orientation.

I use that as an example of how seriously the potential of an engine design
is cut back to preserve warranty and assure CARB approval and consistent
results within EPA guidelines....  And, with OBDIII just around the corner,
this will get even more pronounced in computer control to lessen the
liability of the manufacturer..

Your mileage may vary..........

>>>Just purchased a 2005 Murano SL AWD and would like to know if using
>>>premium grade gas is really necessary or will using regular be ok.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> manufacturer would design an engine to be damaged if premium is not used.
> That is what a knock sensor is for.
coryrhonda - 13 Apr 2005 04:16 GMT
In all of the schooling I've been to as a mechanic they have never told me
or have I ever have had (spark) Knock (predetonation) to be explained to me
as a "misfire".  I've been taught it is fuel burning (exploding) too early
as the piston is not ready for down travel yet and primarily egr and
ignition timing is added to counter act as the knock sensor picks it up.
Premium fuel burn slower which is why we don't have the explosion so early,
with is also why in below zero weather cars with premium fuel start harder
than if they had regular.
> Not directed to me, but I will take a shot....
>
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
>> manufacturer would design an engine to be damaged if premium is not used.
>> That is what a knock sensor is for.
coryrhonda - 13 Apr 2005 04:26 GMT
> In all of the schooling I've been to as a mechanic they have never told me
> or have I ever have had (spark) Knock (predetonation) to be explained to
> me as a "misfire".  I've been taught it is fuel burning (exploding) too
> early
from high combustion temps under load
> as the piston is not ready for down travel yet and primarily egr and
> ignition timing is added to counter act
(cool the combustion chamber)
as the knock sensor picks it up.
> Premium fuel burn slower which is why we don't have the explosion so
> early, with is also why in below zero weather cars with premium fuel start
> harder

thought I would add those too lines to better explain after I read my own
writing.
dalite01@bellsouth.net - 13 Apr 2005 20:45 GMT
Your description is far better (and far more accurate) than mine in
referring to it as minfire.  I tend to use that as a catch all phrase for
any condition that deviates from proper fire at the proper time.

If I remember right, the actual definition (or manifestation) of the
percentage of misfire shows up as Nitrides of Oxygen measured at the
tailpipe -  But it has been almost 30 years since I was actively involved in
the auto tune-up market, and my brain is foggy....

>> In all of the schooling I've been to as a mechanic they have never told
>> me or have I ever have had (spark) Knock (predetonation) to be explained
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> thought I would add those too lines to better explain after I read my own
> writing.
SgtRich - 13 Apr 2005 08:18 GMT
>Just purchased a 2005 Murano SL AWD and would like to know if using premium
>grade gas is really necessary or will using regular be ok. Owner's manual
>isn't very clear except to say that for best performance use high test,
>won't be racing just city driving. Thanks

Bill,

Congrats on your new MO! I picked mine up two weeks ago today. So far, it's
the best vehicle I've ever owned! How about you?

During the delivery "talk", my salesman (for all his opinion was worth)
pointed out what the manual said regarding fuel requirements, then said,
"Premium fuel is *not* REQUIRED and, in my opinion, it isn't worth the extra
price. I'd stick with at least 91 octane, though."

Well, in my area, regular is 87 octane, mid-grade is 89 octane and premium
is 93 octane. Hmmm...

Just my opinion (as well as what I'm doing):

Aluminum engine + high compression engine = Premium gasoline

For what I paid for this vehicle, I'll pay the extra few cents to keep it
running strong.
Signature

<<<SgtRich>>>
Chicago, Illinois, USA
2005 Nissan Murano SL AWD

dalite01@bellsouth.net - 13 Apr 2005 20:47 GMT
If you want to squeeze the best fuel economy out of it, try to keep below
2000 RPM in all driving conditions; whenever possible.

That seems to be the engine speed that it likes.

It took me a few tanks of gas to find the sweet spot after getting my
Murano.

>>Just purchased a 2005 Murano SL AWD and would like to know if using
>>premium
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> For what I paid for this vehicle, I'll pay the extra few cents to keep it
> running strong.
DIANNE BARKER - 08 May 2005 00:59 GMT
The computer detects through the use of sensors the octane range and adjust
the performance accordingly. ie it retards the ignition timing.
The dngine is designed to run on premium but the trade off isnt worth it. On
these engines your mpg will decline and the the possibility of long term
damage.
How much did you pay for this vehicle the other option is to buy a vehicle
that runs well on 97 octane.
> If you want to squeeze the best fuel economy out of it, try to keep below
> 2000 RPM in all driving conditions; whenever possible.
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>> For what I paid for this vehicle, I'll pay the extra few cents to keep it
>> running strong.
Gary Steele - 08 May 2005 04:00 GMT
Is this the same engine as the 2002 etc.  3.5 SE model Altima's?

Should I be using high test too?

What a difference driving this car rather than a puddle jumper.

> The computer detects through the use of sensors the octane range and adjust
> the performance accordingly. ie it retards the ignition timing.
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> >> Chicago, Illinois, USA
> >> 2005 Nissan Murano SL AWD
rjjj - 08 May 2005 16:48 GMT
I lease my 2003. I get a solid 19.7 mpg. What is the expected mpg for a
Murano run-on premium?

Love the transmission and engine and just about everything else on it.
dalite01@bellsouth.net - 09 May 2005 14:15 GMT
If you drive under 2K RPM, you will get up to 25.0 MPG on the highway.

MPG Decreases sharply when the engine is running over 2000 RPM.

The hardest thing to learn is to let the CVT vary the drive ratio at lower
RPM than you are used to observing on the ptachometer of previous cars.

Acceleration to highway speeds can be achieved at lower engine speed.

However, stop and go driving requires higher RPM to get up to the lock-up
speed for the torque converter (18-20 MPH).

The calculations programmed into the fuel economy display are equally
"weighted for time spent at idle (stopped in traffic) and time spent up to
speed.  For this reason, MPG shown on the display may not be accurate for
drivers that spend the majority of their time in stop and go traffic.

Also, the MPG and DTE figures will vary greatly after a reset (MPG) or near
the bottom of the tank (DTE).

>I lease my 2003. I get a solid 19.7 mpg. What is the expected mpg for a
>Murano run-on premium?
>
> Love the transmission and engine and just about everything else on it.
DIANNE BARKER - 08 May 2005 00:53 GMT
How much did you pay
> Just purchased a 2005 Murano SL AWD and would like to know if using
> premium grade gas is really necessary or will using regular be ok. Owner's
> manual isn't very clear except to say that for best performance use high
> test, won't be racing just city driving. Thanks
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.