> Over the July 4th holiday we did around 1,700miles with the air
> conditioning going, average speed was 54mph to our destination and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> conditioner was running at least 90% of the time. Our 2004 Quest hit
> 10,000 miles during the trip.
Not bad at all, although the AC will actually help with the fuel mileage
vs windows down. Modern AC systems are pretty efficient!
"JacK" <jack.leeper@gmail.com> wrote in news:1122001053.090161.256570
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
> Over the July 4th holiday we did around 1,700miles with the air
> conditioning going, average speed was 54mph to our destination and
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> FYI
Was that from the mileage computer or calculated manually? If it's the
latter, that is definitely on the high end. Especially with the Quest
coming in at 4000 pounds.
JacK - 22 Jul 2005 13:01 GMT
This was all from the computer. If my wife would not have insisted that
we kept the van running at stops (food, restarea, etc) the mileage
would have been better. Our trip was 850 miles one way taking 2 days.
I reset the computer when we got back and our around town driving
seems to be showing somewhere around 19mpg. Either way, it sure is a
lot better then our Ford Expedition. That thing was a gas
hog.............. The Quest sure is nice to drive on the long hauls.
Oh, I also had installed a trailer hitch and had a cargo carrier
attached. It worked out great so most of our large bags were kept
outside leaving more room for the kids. I just had to watch it on some
of the drive entrances that had the extreme dip. With the lower Quest I
can't just fly into parking lots like I used to with the ol' SUV cuz
the cargo thing would scrape sometimes... No harm though.....
Newsgroup User - 24 Jul 2005 14:05 GMT
> Was that from the mileage computer or calculated manually? If it's the
> latter, that is definitely on the high end. Especially with the Quest
> coming in at 4000 pounds.
I've found the computer on my G to be quite accurate, even more so than
when I was doing it manually. The computer knows EXACTLY how much gas
goes into the engine and will be much more accurate than the paper method.