Feedback to all my fellow Quest owners.
I have a 1999 w/107K miles. Bought it new. Without a doubt, the best vehicle
I've ever owned. Garage kept, synthetic oil only, regular maintenance. I'm
on my third set of tires and third set of brakes. Has Nissan ever produced
a more reliable vehicle?
Paradox - 10 Aug 2006 06:56 GMT
> Feedback to all my fellow Quest owners.
> I have a 1999 w/107K miles. Bought it new. Without a doubt, the best vehicle
> I've ever owned. Garage kept, synthetic oil only, regular maintenance. I'm
> on my third set of tires and third set of brakes. Has Nissan ever produced
> a more reliable vehicle?
For some reason I remember that van as being a rebadged something or another
domestic minivan.
Rich - 10 Aug 2006 15:09 GMT
>> Feedback to all my fellow Quest owners.
>> I have a 1999 w/107K miles. Bought it new. Without a doubt, the best
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> another
> domestic minivan.
No, it actually is a Nissan product. The Mercury Villager was a rebadged
version of it. Both were built in the same line in...Ohio, I think.
NissanSalesRep - 15 Aug 2006 12:16 GMT
You're right.
The Quest was a joint Mercury/Nissan venture. It was a Nissan design and
powerplant but Mercury assembled at Avon Lake, Ohio. It was my understanding
that Nissan Quest had about ten more quality inspections than the Villager
did and those that failed the inspections went on to be Mercury Villagers.
Have you checked into the 2007's yet? What a ride! ! !
NissanSalesRep
>>> Feedback to all my fellow Quest owners.
>>> I have a 1999 w/107K miles. Bought it new. Without a doubt, the best
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> No, it actually is a Nissan product. The Mercury Villager was a rebadged
> version of it. Both were built in the same line in...Ohio, I think.
Roy - 15 Dec 2006 23:15 GMT
The 2007 Quest is a great riding van. Feels tight. I bought
a 2007 on Oct 31, 2006 when the mileage reached 2000 miles the speedomater
broke and the dealer has had my van since December 4th 2006 and tells me
that they don't
know when they get the part due to none in supply line. Owners will have to
hope that nothing happens and they need parts.
> You're right.
> The Quest was a joint Mercury/Nissan venture. It was a Nissan design and
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>> No, it actually is a Nissan product. The Mercury Villager was a rebadged
>> version of it. Both were built in the same line in...Ohio, I think.
Codifus - 10 Aug 2006 15:19 GMT
>>Feedback to all my fellow Quest owners.
>>I have a 1999 w/107K miles. Bought it new. Without a doubt, the best
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> For some reason I remember that van as being a rebadged something or another
> domestic minivan.
The Mercury Villager IS the Nissan Quest. Ford just borrowed it.
CD
Codifus - 10 Aug 2006 15:21 GMT
> Feedback to all my fellow Quest owners.
> I have a 1999 w/107K miles. Bought it new. Without a doubt, the best vehicle
> I've ever owned. Garage kept, synthetic oil only, regular maintenance. I'm
> on my third set of tires and third set of brakes. Has Nissan ever produced
> a more reliable vehicle?
You are right about at the time for a timing belt change. I think the
1999 version of the Quest is the best looking, too. The 2001 seems to
have an abnormally big mought grille, and the 1994 and 95 version seem
dated looking, even when they were brand new.
CD
juanalong - 10 Aug 2006 23:12 GMT
Rebadged Villager? Both were assembled in Avon Park, Ohio, but the Quest
seemed to retain it's value better. Check any blue book value and the 1999
Quest has a higher value than the 1999 Villager, with same package.
Your correct in that the Villager is a rebadged Quest.
I also have a 2005 Isuzu Ascender, which is definitely a rebadged
Trailblazer. GM designed, GM engine, GM parts, GM etc... The 7 yr old Quest
runs better :-)
>> Feedback to all my fellow Quest owners.
>> I have a 1999 w/107K miles. Bought it new. Without a doubt, the best
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> CD
Michael Marshburn - 15 Aug 2006 16:48 GMT
I have a 2000 with over 135K...mechanically it's good but cosmetic and some
electrical things have begun to go...for example, the seatbelt light only
works if the buckle's in the right spot, otherwise, it behaves as if it's
buckled. Otherwise, it's a good car. The most costly mechanical repair was
when the CV axle was found ripped at 131K miles, and the repair was
$800-$1,000 (I can't exacty remember). The Quest tends to be better on trips
than in town, even though it's a daily driver. I see no major repair soon
other than the rear wheel ball bearings. The oil is changes every 7,500
miles, and is also on its third set of tires and about to be on the third
set of brakes. Also, I've noticed the van is tough to abuse. One time when
the bumper got crushed when I pulled into a parking spot too fast, there
wasn't a scratch on the bumper even though it got pushed inward. And, there
aren't any recalls on ours (the seat belt recall is just out of our VIN
range.)
Long story short, it's a tough car, but when it falls apart, everything
goes. It may be up for replacement soon, though. I'll be sad to see it go.
> Feedback to all my fellow Quest owners.
> I have a 1999 w/107K miles. Bought it new. Without a doubt, the best
> vehicle I've ever owned. Garage kept, synthetic oil only, regular
> maintenance. I'm on my third set of tires and third set of brakes. Has
> Nissan ever produced a more reliable vehicle?