Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Nissan / Nissan Cars / April 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ECU & IACV tech question (Nisstech?)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
JM - 25 Mar 2007 23:01 GMT
Ok, here's the deal... I'll try to keep it short.

99 Altima, 5 speed, 116,000 km.

The idle speed was a little too high when I got the car, but by adjusting
the idle screw (all the way) I got it down to around 750 RPM.

The problem that I'm still having is, as I ease into the throttle, as I
cross around 1250 RPM, the revs will suddenly increase to about 2,000 RPM
even though I haven't opened the throttle any further.  This manifests
itself as an abruptness when I ease into the throttle while on the road, or
when I take my foot off the gas.

If I disconnect the IAC valve, this doesn't happen.

In looking at the factory service manual, I see that the IACV should be at
around 20% at idle, and they show just a dash ( - ) at 2,000 RPM, which I
assume means 0%.  They also show a scope reading, which appears to show the
IACV pulse being on for 4ms and off for 2ms at idle, vs on for 2ms and off
for 4ms at 2,000 RPM.

If I'm reading that correctly, then it would appear something's causing my
IACV to stay open MORE at 2,000 RPM (or above 1250 RPM).

Any thoughts on this?  Everything shown in the manual as being used by the
ECU to determine IACV position as far as I know is OK with the exception of
the ambient temp switch, which I haven't tested.

I'm totally confused as to why the IACV would open further as I'm opening
the throttle, unless it's programmed that way to help keep the revs up while
taking off from a stop with the clutch, but I would expect they would cancel
this behavior once the car was moving more than say 5 km/hr.
JM - 25 Mar 2007 23:08 GMT
Ok, having looked at the manual a 2nd time, maybe I misinterpreted the
example scope readings.. looks like they are taking voltage from the ECU pin
that grounds the IACV, so 12v would represent a closed valve and 0v would be
full open, in which case what I'm seeing in my car would actually be
correct, as much as I hate to believe that.
Telstar Electronics - 25 Mar 2007 23:24 GMT
> Ok, here's the deal... I'll try to keep it short.
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> taking off from a stop with the clutch, but I would expect they would cancel
> this behavior once the car was moving more than say 5 km/hr.

It seems very odd to me the the IAC would have that much effect...
Have you looked with a scope at the pulse going into the IAC?... at
idle and 2000RPM?
Does it look like the manual describes?

www.telstar-electronics.com
JM - 25 Mar 2007 23:39 GMT
"Telstar Electronics" <briangriffey@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> It seems very odd to me the the IAC would have that much effect...
> Have you looked with a scope at the pulse going into the IAC?... at
> idle and 2000RPM?
> Does it look like the manual describes?

Unfortunately, no, I don't have access to a scope.  I'd love to be able to
see what the duty cycle is at idle vs 2k RPM though.
Telstar Electronics - 26 Mar 2007 18:07 GMT
> "Telstar Electronics" <briangrif...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> > It seems very odd to me the the IAC would have that much effect...
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Unfortunately, no, I don't have access to a scope.  I'd love to be able to
> see what the duty cycle is at idle vs 2k RPM though.

One thing that occurs to me is... Can I assume your check-engine light
is on now that you disconnected your IAC?
Have you checked the ECU for other non self-induced codes?

www.telstar-electronics.com
JM - 26 Mar 2007 21:53 GMT
>> Unfortunately, no, I don't have access to a scope.  I'd love to be able
>> to
>> see what the duty cycle is at idle vs 2k RPM though.
> One thing that occurs to me is... Can I assume your check-engine light
> is on now that you disconnected your IAC?
> Have you checked the ECU for other non self-induced codes?

The CEL did eventually light, yesterday while I was testing its behavior
above 2000RPM, but I drove around a fair but with it unplugged previously
without it coming on.  Maybe it took a second trip for it to light the CEL.

No other codes are, or ever have been, stored, "unfortunately".
Scott Dorsey - 26 Mar 2007 15:46 GMT
>> The problem that I'm still having is, as I ease into the throttle, as I
>> cross around 1250 RPM, the revs will suddenly increase to about 2,000 RPM
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>> If I disconnect the IAC valve, this doesn't happen.

>It seems very odd to me the the IAC would have that much effect...
>Have you looked with a scope at the pulse going into the IAC?... at
>idle and 2000RPM?
>Does it look like the manual describes?

Agreed.  And are you sure the TPS is good?  Measure it and make sure.
--scott

Signature

"C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

JM - 26 Mar 2007 21:57 GMT
>>It seems very odd to me the the IAC would have that much effect...
>>Have you looked with a scope at the pulse going into the IAC?... at
>>idle and 2000RPM?
>>Does it look like the manual describes?
> Agreed.  And are you sure the TPS is good?  Measure it and make sure.

I'm 98% sure it's good.  I've tested it with an analog meter as well as
monitoring it with my Autotap and laptop, and it's smooth without any
dropouts or spikes.  The TPS has always been my first thought, because if
there was a dropout at some point, I *would* expect the ECU to open the IAC
valve up as if it were at idle again.  Maybe I have such a small drop out
that it doesn't register on the meter or the Autotap...  although you would
think if the ECU sees it the Autotap would as well.
Scott Dorsey - 27 Mar 2007 15:07 GMT
>>>It seems very odd to me the the IAC would have that much effect...
>>>Have you looked with a scope at the pulse going into the IAC?... at
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>that it doesn't register on the meter or the Autotap...  although you would
>think if the ECU sees it the Autotap would as well.

If there were a dropout, you would have seen it.  Most of what happens on
these actually are cracks in the element rather than dropouts, and that is
very obvious.

Hmmm....
--scott

Signature

"C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

JM - 27 Mar 2007 21:31 GMT
> If there were a dropout, you would have seen it.  Most of what happens on
> these actually are cracks in the element rather than dropouts, and that is
> very obvious.
>
> Hmmm....

Agreed.  I'm pretty much at the end of my rope on this one...  I'd like to
get a scope and see what the ECU is doing to my IACV... or failing that hear
from another 2nd gen 5 speed Altima owner to find out if theirs works the
same way.
My only other thought is maybe I have the wrong PCV valve installed which is
allowing too much airflow and throwing things off.  That seems unlikely, but
there's not much left!
Telstar Electronics - 28 Mar 2007 19:08 GMT
> > If there were a dropout, you would have seen it.  Most of what happens on
> > these actually are cracks in the element rather than dropouts, and that is
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> allowing too much airflow and throwing things off.  That seems unlikely, but
> there's not much left!

I think scoping the IAC would be a good (and simple) action plan at
this point. You seem to suspect this part... but are unable to prove a
problem exists in that area without a look at that signal.

www.telstar-electronics.com
JM - 28 Mar 2007 21:44 GMT
"Telstar Electronics" <briangriffey@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> I think scoping the IAC would be a good (and simple) action plan at
> this point. You seem to suspect this part... but are unable to prove a
> problem exists in that area without a look at that signal.

Well, I know the part is good; I replaced it because it's all part of one
unit that includes the idle adjust screw.. which was seized when I got the
car.  But, that is the next thing I want to try, if I can find a scope.
dlowrie@nc.rr.com - 29 Mar 2007 03:03 GMT
I really dont know if this would pertain but on the sr20de engines
regrounding the map sensor (solder onto the wire out of the map and to
a good chassis ground) smooths out a lot of idle problems, maybe this
is worth a shot?
JM - 29 Mar 2007 21:59 GMT
>I really dont know if this would pertain but on the sr20de engines
> regrounding the map sensor (solder onto the wire out of the map and to
> a good chassis ground) smooths out a lot of idle problems, maybe this
> is worth a shot?

Yeah, I have heard of that fix, and although I dont think I actually tried
it, I did measure the voltage between that pin and ground and there was
none, so I think I have a good ground.
Thanks for the suggestion though!
Tegger - 26 Mar 2007 19:45 GMT
> Ok, here's the deal... I'll try to keep it short.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> adjusting the idle screw (all the way) I got it down to around 750
> RPM.

Not specifically familair with Nissans, but...

Are you sure that's the correct idle adjustment procedure? Some cars need
to have other things done first, such as disconnecting the IAC, or to have
a jumper shorted, when adjusting the idle screw. Failure to follow correct
procedure will result in incorrectly-set idle.

You may have an air leak somewhere (like secondary cold-running air inputs,
an unplugged vacuum hose, or a loose intake manifold). The ECM would then
be adding fuel to correct the mixture, resulting in an elevated idle.

Signature

Tegger

JM - 26 Mar 2007 22:03 GMT
> Not specifically familair with Nissans, but...
> Are you sure that's the correct idle adjustment procedure? Some cars need
> to have other things done first, such as disconnecting the IAC, or to have
> a jumper shorted, when adjusting the idle screw. Failure to follow correct
> procedure will result in incorrectly-set idle.

Yep, the procedure is to disconnect both TPS connectors, rev the engine a
few times over 2k I believe, and then set the idle.  I did it by the book at
the time.

> You may have an air leak somewhere (like secondary cold-running air
> inputs,
> an unplugged vacuum hose, or a loose intake manifold). The ECM would then
> be adding fuel to correct the mixture, resulting in an elevated idle.

Yeah, I've looked for any sign of a vacuum leak, but never found one.  I've
sprayed TB cleaner around the vacuum lines and intake manifold, with no
change in revs.  I even tried pressurizing the intake manifold by sealing
the end of the intake hose and blowing in the fitting for the aux air valve,
and there was only a very very slight leakage, which could very well have
been around my plastic bag/rubber band seal.
AS - 29 Mar 2007 22:44 GMT
Check the throttle stop screw for tampering.

The AIC compensates for idle variations, cold start idle and acts as a
dashpot when decelerating, right?  I doubt it is the cause of the jump
in rpms though.

Have you checked for any obstructions in the air intake?  I am thinking
of something acting as a flap.

Good luck!

>>Ok, here's the deal... I'll try to keep it short.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> an unplugged vacuum hose, or a loose intake manifold). The ECM would then
> be adding fuel to correct the mixture, resulting in an elevated idle.
JM - 30 Mar 2007 01:15 GMT
> Check the throttle stop screw for tampering.

I played with it myself before I replaced the idle adjust screw in order to
get the idle down.. but it's now back to where it was originally based on
the TPS reading at idle.

> The AIC compensates for idle variations, cold start idle and acts as a
> dashpot when decelerating, right?  I doubt it is the cause of the jump in
> rpms though.

But it is, because with it unplugged, the rpm change is gone.  I've wondered
if it had more to do with the amount of airflow reaching a certain threshold
and causing something to change in the intake stream myself, but I always
come back to the fact that unplugging the valve eliminates that behavior.

> Have you checked for any obstructions in the air intake?  I am thinking of
> something acting as a flap.

Yeah, I've been down that road and everything looks fine.  Someone suggested
at one point that maybe the throttle plate was loose, but that's not the
case.

> Good luck!

Thanks!
JM - 30 Mar 2007 01:44 GMT
For what it's worth, I just found a post by a fellow with a 96 Primera 1.6L
with *all* of the same symptoms I am getting in my Altima:

http://groups.google.ca/group/uk.rec.cars.maintenance/browse_thread/thread/ffbbd
347a90ddaf9/c5e618d2bfda6107?lnk=st&q=nissan+revs+tps&rnum=4&hl=en#c5e618d2bfda6
107


I've fired him off an email, so hopefully he's still around (it's an old
post) and with any luck can point me in the right direction.  If he was able
to solve his problems, I'm sure the solution will be the same; his
description of the problem is exactly what I'm dealing with.

Sometimes it's nice just to discover you're not just imagining this stuff!
JM - 01 Apr 2007 17:39 GMT
> In looking at the factory service manual, I see that the IACV should be at
> around 20% at idle, and they show just a dash ( - ) at 2,000 RPM, which I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> If I'm reading that correctly, then it would appear something's causing my
> IACV to stay open MORE at 2,000 RPM (or above 1250 RPM).

Although I haven't found a scope yet, measured the voltage at the ECU side
of the IACV yesterday, and it read around 10V at idle, and decreased at the
exact point the revs jump up to 2000 RPM.. what's more, the voltage
continued to drop to about 0V beyond 2500-3000 RPM, meaning the ECU must
have been grounding the EACV almost 100% -- the IACV appears to receive 12V
constantly on one pin and the other pin connects to the ECU which I assume
is providing ground at varying intervals to control the opening of the valve

I can see where that might be normal, in order to keep the revs up if you
suddenly come off the throttle, but the only problem is why does it jump in
so abruptly around 1250 rpm, and the cut off as I release the pedal just as
abruptly?

To eliminate the possibility of it having to do with the amount of airflow
vs. the position of the throttle, I pulled the vacuum line off the brake
booster, and held it to the PCV breather fitting on the intake duct.  This
brought the revs up to about 1500 rpm, so it seems the IACV is acting based
on the input from the TPS, and not based on the air coming in.

But, TPS doesn't show any flat spots or dropouts in its sweep, and I've
tried adjusting it either side of where it was from the factory, with no
real change once the ECU has relearned the resting position of the
throttle...  Maybe I should see if I can pick up a TPS from a wrecked car
and hope I see a difference??
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.