Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Nissan / Nissan Cars / February 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Micra '06

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
t8769 - 11 Feb 2008 00:20 GMT
I've been reading lots of horror stories about poor quality build of
the new Micra.

Many people have reported problems, particularly with the timing belt
after a few years. Others have mentioned the need for constant repair,
and I'm quite shocked as the old Micra had a reputation for very high
quality and very rarely having problems.

Have these problems been fixed in the later models, made after 05- 06,
or are these cars poorly built.

Thanks
mike - 11 Feb 2008 22:32 GMT
It's basically a clio platform with french electrics....says it all really.
If you forget about the stupid keyless ignition you'll probably be ok - 99%
of the problems are due to that. Mines been fine, better than a Ford
anyway....

petrol engine has a timing chain, shouldn't be a problem with regular oil
changes....
t8769 - 14 Feb 2008 00:09 GMT
Well I was shocked.

The old Micra was a tank disguised as a car. The thing was incredibly
well built, and had a reputation for reliability and quality build
that few other cars had. One friend has an 18 year old Micra in great
condition, another had a 12 year old Micra which didn't have a thing
wrong with it.

The new Micra is, as you say, a French car with a Japanese Nissan
sticker on the front. Its not well built, its not well designed, its
not solid and its not a patch on the old Mirca. Some design faults are
really bad. Its pretty cheap, cheap plastic, cheaply put together,
cheaply designed.  It feels and drives like a common French car, and
those aren't known for reliability or quality build.

I was hoping to buy a quality Japanese car that I could keep for 10
years or longer, but I got a shoddy French car that I'll have to sell
after 5 years.

In my experience French cars are not something you want to have around
after 60,000 as they tend to fall apart. A good Japanese car can be
driven for 120,000 before it starts having serious problems, and
sometimes not even then. A friend's Micra has done over 150,000.

The Micra became a hit on its reputation for quality and reliability,
i.e. it sold on word of mouth. But if its just another shoddy French
car, I don't think Nissan will be able to fool people for much longer,
and will perhaps go the way of Rover. You can only fool people for a
limited time, and people talk.

Today I found that the car doors have soft foam on the interior, so
when I put a box in the front it dented it, and now is permanently
damaged. This is appallingly bad design, I just can't believe that a
quality car like the old Micra is now being made cheaply and badly. Oh
well....all good things come to an end.

> It's basically a clio platform with French electrics....says it all really.
> If you forget about the stupid keyless ignition you'll probably be ok - 99%
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> petrol engine has a timing chain, shouldn't be a problem with regular oil
> changes....
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.