Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Nissan / Nissan Cars / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

the "brown's gas", run your auto on hydrogen, hydrogen generator,     super gas mileage, idea

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
nucleus - 18 May 2008 01:17 GMT
my opinion of this is that it is a scam.

my reasoning is that, from what i have seen (and if the
concept is based upon electrolysis), the significant
energy required for disassociation of water into
hydrogen (and oxygen) must come from the battery/
alternator (which takes fuel to produce).  AND the
first law of thermodynamics.

am i right or wrong???
willshak - 18 May 2008 02:10 GMT
on 5/17/2008 8:17 PM nucleus said the following:
> my opinion of this is that it is a scam.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> am i right or wrong???
>  

What we need is a perpetual motion machine.
I think Billy Mays advertises one on TV for $19.95, but if you call now,
he'll double it to 2 machines for $19.95. :-)

Signature

Bill
In Hamptonburgh, NY
To email, remove the double zeroes after @

Redigoogle - 18 May 2008 18:06 GMT
> my opinion of this is that it is a scam.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> am i right or wrong???

I've just spent some time searching for any documentation that
verifies or debunks Brown's Gas
for autos. I found some discussion about patent disputes and opinions
disparaging it's use in welding.
So far though I've found no one with verifiable data regarding the
effectiveness of its use in autos.
That in itself seems to put it in the scam end of the spectrum.
hth
Peter Hill - 19 May 2008 07:50 GMT
>> my opinion of this is that it is a scam.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>That in itself seems to put it in the scam end of the spectrum.
>hth

Browns gas is result of electrolysis of water H20 > HH0. Energy
available in browns gas is less than energy input to electrolysis.

Energy at crank from combustion of browns gas (or any fuel/oxidant
mix) is about 25% of available energy. The other 75% goes down the
exhaust pipe as noise and into the cooling system as heat.

Conversion of crank energy to electricity in alternator is about
90-95% efficient.

Overall less than 22% efficient and actually less efficient than the
use of regular gasoline. So you have to burn MORE fuel to keep the
process going. Any initial gain seen or claimed is from discharging
battery - better have some jump leads ready. Electricity to re-charge
battery costs more than fuel.

Browns gas for welding is fine but expensive to have safe kit. A
"desktop" generator for micro flame used for glasswork and
thermocouples costs close to £4000 (UKP) and larger units cost around
£12,000 (UKP). Temperature is high (it can cut brick), flame is clean
(can't ever soot) but lacks visibility. The advantages are you can't
run out unless you have a power cut (good excuse to hit the beach at
3pm in California I understand) and don't have to store a bottle of
acetylene so safer and reduced insurance.
Signature

Peter Hill
Spamtrap reply domain as per NNTP-Posting-Host in header
Can of worms - what every fisherman wants.
Can of worms - what every PC owner gets!

Redigoogle - 19 May 2008 16:38 GMT
On May 18, 11:50 pm, Peter Hill <peter.usen...@nospam.demon.co.uk>
wrote:
> On Sun, 18 May 2008 10:06:32 -0700 (PDT), Redigoogle

> Browns gas is result of electrolysis of water H20 > HH0. Energy
> available in browns gas is less than energy input to electrolysis.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> battery - better have some jump leads ready. Electricity to re-charge
> battery costs more than fuel.

Peter,

OK. However, isn't the idea of using Brown's gas for automobiles
not to run on Brown's gas alone, but to supplement refined gasoline or
diesel fuel
by producing Brown's gas from the waste energy from the internal
combustion process
and excess alternator generation?

In that case, the net inefficiency of producing the Brown's gas
would not matter. At least that is the sales logic in presentations
by
sellers of Brown's gas units for automobiles.

But, where are the hard numbers that document that it works from
dispassionate users?

Your further comments are appreciated.

Cliff
Peter Hill - 19 May 2008 17:54 GMT
>On May 18, 11:50 pm, Peter Hill <peter.usen...@nospam.demon.co.uk>
>wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
>Cliff

WASTE energy? Only waste energy from internal combustion engine is
noise and heat. Neither can be used to dissociate water into browns
gas.

Only thing that can make browns gas is electricity. That can only be
obtained from the alternator driven by the crank or by draining the
battery. There is no "FREE" excess alternator generation, draw more
power from the alternator, it draws more power from the crank. The
additional load to drive the browns gas generator means more fuel has
to be burnt to drive the alternator.

1000 watts of fuel power = 250 watts (~20A @ 12v) of crank power =
237.5 watts of power for browns gas generator = 215 watts of browns
gas. 1000w - 215w = 785 watts of fuel power expended to run a browns
gas generator. That's over 1 bhp worth of fuel going nowhere near the
road, or heater fan or screen heater or stereo. It's like running with
an extra rear screen heater switched on all the time.
Signature

Peter Hill
Spamtrap reply domain as per NNTP-Posting-Host in header
Can of worms - what every fisherman wants.
Can of worms - what every PC owner gets!

nucleus - 20 May 2008 12:06 GMT
On May 19, 11:54 am, Peter Hill <peter.usen...@nospam.demon.co.uk>
wrote:
> On Mon, 19 May 2008 08:38:19 -0700 (PDT), Redigoogle
>
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> additional load to drive the browns gas generator means more fuel has
> to be burnt to drive the alternator.

what you are describing is the "first law of thermodynamics".

> 1000 watts of fuel power = 250 watts (~20A @ 12v) of crank power =
> 237.5 watts of power for browns gas generator = 215 watts of browns
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Peter Hill - 21 May 2008 00:21 GMT
>what you are describing is the "first law of thermodynamics".

Tell a layman that it's the "first law of thermodynamics" and it means
nothing, so they will still put their faith in a convincing charlatan.
Signature

Peter Hill
Spamtrap reply domain as per NNTP-Posting-Host in header
Can of worms - what every fisherman wants.
Can of worms - what every PC owner gets!

Redigoogle - 20 May 2008 17:05 GMT
> >On May 18, 11:50 pm, Peter Hill <peter.usen...@nospam.demon.co.uk>

> WASTE energy? Only waste energy from internal combustion engine is
> noise and heat. Neither can be used to dissociate water into browns
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> obtained from the alternator driven by the crank or by draining the
> battery. There is no "FREE" excess alternator generation,

Thank you for this clarification.
Personally, I consider the question of Brown's Gas for supplementing
auto fuel resolved.

My thinking really points to the essential  ingredient
of any successful scam. The pitch "sounds" good because it draws
upon certain "facts" that are true, but always leaves out some
primary element in order to conjure a hopeful but unrealistic
solution.

Thanks again, Peter

Cliff
John Henderson - 20 May 2008 22:19 GMT
> Thank you for this clarification.
> Personally, I consider the question of Brown's Gas for
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> out some primary element in order to conjure a hopeful but
> unrealistic solution.

Another aspect of these scams is that some people who buy their
products want them to work so much that they drive very
carefully and economically to get the most from their
investment.

So their mileage improves just because of that driving-style
change, and they turn around amd endorse the product as a
result.

John
Redigoogle - 21 May 2008 15:49 GMT
> > Thank you for this clarification.
> > Personally, I consider the question of Brown's Gas for
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> John

That's a good point John. Then there is the purely subjective
evaluation as well.
I mean, my vehicles always run better after I thouroughly clean them
inside and out.
Really. Doesn't your's?
Cliff
willshak - 21 May 2008 17:34 GMT
on 5/21/2008 10:49 AM Redigoogle said the following:
>  
>>    
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> Cliff
>  

A clean car runs better! Or so the car wash industry says. :-)

Signature

Bill
In Hamptonburgh, NY
To email, remove the double zeroes after @

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.