Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Oldsmobile Cars / March 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

455 Toro intake & ignition change...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Shock - 01 Mar 2004 13:56 GMT
I've got a '73 Toro with a stock 455/Quadrajet on it and points distributor.
The carb is a generic rebuild and I'm not real happy with it. The original
Quadrajet was waaay better until it puked. Got replaced by a shop and don't
know where they got the replacement. They also replaced the distributor
because they "broke some wires on the old one," and I'm not 100% sure the
replacement dist. is as good as it should be either. (Before the work was
done, I was getting 22 MPG highway and now I barely get 15-17 MPG on the same
trip. Obviously, something's not right.) Have checked, adjusted, and re-
checked dwell, timing, points, plugs, wires, connections, hoses, gaskets,
etc.... anything I could think of that might have an effect on fuel economy
and/or performance and I haven't been able to nail anything down as being the
culprit. Small improvements here and there, to be sure, but nothing has
gotten me back to what I had with the original (OLD) parts.

So I was thinking: What if I junk the carb, distributor, and intake and
replace it all with a good HEI, a professionally rebuilt Quadrajet (am
probably going to have Sparky's do that for me), and an aftermarket aluminum
intake? Have heard of some intakes causing clearance probs with the Toro's
hoodline and/or the HEI dist.
Anyone have any experience they'd like to share?

~~Shock~~
G Larson - 03 Mar 2004 00:01 GMT
Go for the HEI and carb. The HEI came in in 74 and 75 so I'd look for a
Toro from those years. (Is there one?) That's what I did with my '73
Riviera; got an HEI off a late 74.

You caould try tuning the carb you've got.

> I've got a '73 Toro with a stock 455/Quadrajet on it and points distributor.
> The carb is a generic rebuild and I'm not real happy with it. The original
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> ~~Shock~~
Shock - 03 Mar 2004 12:59 GMT
> Go for the HEI and carb. The HEI came in in 74 and 75 so I'd look for a
> Toro from those years. (Is there one?) That's what I did with my '73
> Riviera; got an HEI off a late 74.
>
> You caould try tuning the carb you've got.

Well, I haven't been able to find another Toro, but I DO have a complete high
output Olds 403 that came out of a Smokey & The Bandit Firebird (or was that
a T/A?). Think it's a '76 or '77 motor. Distributor's good and the motor ran
like a champ before the car it was in was junked.

Have tried all the usual adjustments to the existing carb but have gotten to
the point where any further gains will have to come from air door
adjustments, main & primary rod changes....maybe even a complete rebuild just
to be sure everything's as it should be in there. And I'm not real
comfortable with my ability to do any of that stuff. Heard about Sparky's on
the Real Olds Power forum on the web. Several guys in there have had carbs
done by Sparky and they all just rave about the improvements they've noticed.
Seems like a pretty safe bet to me....
Now. Just gotta find an old, non-electronic Quadrajet for him to work his
majik on whilst I drive the one I've got....

~~Shock~~
G Larson - 04 Mar 2004 12:07 GMT
I've gotten decent rebuildables off eBay. Nice old 750 cfm quadrajets.

>>Go for the HEI and carb. The HEI came in in 74 and 75 so I'd look for a
>>Toro from those years. (Is there one?) That's what I did with my '73
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> ~~Shock~~
Nightcreature - 07 Mar 2004 16:07 GMT
I have several Toros (66,67,70,72), one of the 67s has been mine from new.
My first observation is that I have never seen anything close to 22 mpg from
any of them, more in the range of 17, if lucky at today's highway speeds.
Although I am aware that there was a final drive ratio change (to a lower
ratio) at least by the 1971 model.

I am not sure about the 71 and on series but the 1966 through 1970 series
utilizes a special low rise manifold to allow the hood to close and a
special version of the Qjet.  I don't have my info handy, after a move, to
check the differences in the carb.  Someone may know, as I don't remember (I
am concentrating on early Starfires the last couple of years), but I
remember that the heads on the Toro 425 were different and may have had
larger ports.  I never knew if similar differences were used in the 455
version of the engine.

The distributor is nothing really special unless you had the optional
capacitive discharge ignition system.

While I don't know, but I suspect your vehicle was leaning out if you saw
mileage that high.  Although I have never driven the 71 and on series very
much so my view might be clouded.

Gerry
Shock - 07 Mar 2004 22:54 GMT
> I have several Toros (66,67,70,72), one of the 67s has been mine from
> new. My first observation is that I have never seen anything close to 22
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Gerry

Gerry,
Thanx for the info on the Qjet. Haven't heard that before, but I'll certainly
check into it. Wouldn't surprise me though, given the large number of "model-
specific" parts on the Toro. All I know for sure is that every aftermarket
manifold I've looked at says it won't clear the Toro hood. Shame. Maybe I'll
see about having a stock manifold Extrude Honed....
My fuel mileage numbers aren't as scientific as they probably could be, but
I've been using the same method for more than 10 years on every car I've
owned. When checking my mileage on highway runs, I record my odometer reading
at the pump, fill up ('til the pump shuts itself off) immediately before
getting on the highway. Upon my return, I pull up to the same pump and park
in the same spot, facing the same direction (to compensate for any slope),
and fill up with the same grade of fuel (always premium for the Toro) using
the same pump nozzle as before. I then record the gallons it took to fill the
tank, record my new odometer reading at the pump, and do the math. Like I
said: maybe not as scientific as it could be, but hey. A guy can only be so
neurotic, right? LOL
Don't know for sure what my final drive is, but from what I've seen elsewhere
on the 'net, I suspect it's 3.07:1. I think I saw somewhere that the earlier
Toros had a 3.21:1. (Anyone who knows otherwise, please feel free to jump in
and correct me if I'm wrong as I've still got a lot to learn about these
cars.) Have also wondered if it's possible to go to a numerically lower final
drive on one of these...say, maybe a 2.75:1? Should be good for highway
runnin'....
Sure would like to have a look at those Toros of yours some day. Absolutely
love the one I was lucky enough to stumble across. Don't know how I ever
drove anything else.

~~Shock~~
Rutger6559 - 18 Mar 2004 19:20 GMT
>Sure would like to have a look at those Toros of yours some day.

You ain't alone, brother!  I love the Toros and Rivs from those days.
Not just great cars, but works of fine art as well.

After seeing cars like that (even just pics of 'em), I wanna puke my
guts out when I see what's being produced these days.

I was born a generation too late!  :(

Anyway guys, enjoy the heck out of 'em (even if the carb isn't exactly
what you'd like).

Just my $0.02 from a person who's quite envious of you both.  :)

Rick
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.