Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Oldsmobile Cars / April 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Help! 72 350 flywheel Help!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Pat Cresswell - 12 Apr 2004 20:08 GMT
Hi, a friend and I just rebuilt the 350 engine in my 72 Cutlass Sup. When we
were re-installing it and connecting it to the torque converter my buddy
started to second guess the way we attached the flywheel to the crank. The
book tells me one hole is offset, to me that would mean it can only go on
one way, (correct me if I am wrong). IF the flywheel could be flipped and
still bolt it to the crank, that would move the teeth further toward the
torque and further away from the starter drive. As currently the "dished"
side is facing forward. The flywheel does have tapered teeth on the side
that the starter will engage on. The problem with where it is bolting to the
torque is that the counter weights on the flywheel are in the way of the
mounts of the torque converter keeping them from sitting flush against the
flywheel. Is this normal? Is there supposed to be a spacer or washer between
them that we have missed? As far as we can remember (we removed it from the
car last fall) there was nothing there when we took it apart. Any help would
be much appreciated. Please reply to the group.

Pat
G Larson - 13 Apr 2004 02:36 GMT
Done it. Forgot it!

Sounds like you've got it on backwards. You could bolt up the starter
and see how that mounts.

Was laying under my 78 olds 98 deisel-converted-to-gas two weeks ago I
seem to recall that the weights were towards the engine.

> Hi, a friend and I just rebuilt the 350 engine in my 72 Cutlass Sup. When we
> were re-installing it and connecting it to the torque converter my buddy
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Pat
ChrisGW - 14 Apr 2004 00:37 GMT
I believe you have it on backwards. If the starter is on you should be able to
look and see if it is going to line up correctly.

ChrisGW

> Hi, a friend and I just rebuilt the 350 engine in my 72 Cutlass Sup. When we
> were re-installing it and connecting it to the torque converter my buddy
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Pat
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.