The fuel gauge on my 406 seems to swing widely across the range towards
full and empty. I don't actually see it moving, but often when glancing
at the gauge, it seems to have moved quarter of a tank in no time at
all. Today for example, I refuelled and the gauge read exactly half
full. Within 24 km, it was reading quarter full. Within 5km it was back
close to half. It appears I cannot rely on the gauge to give me a
reliable indication of fule in the tank. Any similar experiences?
G Cadman - 03 Dec 2005 08:58 GMT
My fuel gauge is very stable and does not fluctuate.
I guess if the change is this rapid then it must be either a loose/bad
connection or a faulty sender unit.
Regards
G
> The fuel gauge on my 406 seems to swing widely across the range towards
> full and empty. I don't actually see it moving, but often when glancing
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> close to half. It appears I cannot rely on the gauge to give me a
> reliable indication of fule in the tank. Any similar experiences?
anvil - 03 Dec 2005 09:46 GMT
G, what model/year do you have? Mine is 1998. The whole instrument
panel/unit had been replaced for the previous (original) owner by the
new car dealer.
Ken - 04 Dec 2005 03:38 GMT
I just returned from a long trip in my 406 V6 and I noticed that the
fuel reading varied a bit - nothing like as much as yours though. It is
usually possible to make the particular trip and return on one
tank-full. I noticed as I was about to leave on the return that the
gauge showed a little less than half-full. But, within 50km or so, it
was above half. OK!
Later, in the same leg, it was markedly down - so much so as to raise
doubts as to whether I would make it home without a transfusion. But
then it seemed to correct itself and I made it home well before the
fuel warning was activated.
I assume that the 406 fuel gauge is driven by the same sort of sender
which has been in use for decades - one which translates the fuel level
into a resistance. If so these variations may be due to a sticking
potentiometer or, maybe, to changing voltage level - the latter would
account for the reassuring improvement in my fuel reserves soon after
departure.
anvil - 04 Dec 2005 04:45 GMT
Thanks Ken
It sounds as if your gauge is behaving in a similar manner to mine,
which could suggest a design factor is involved. I am keen to hear from
other owners, particularly V6 owners, just to compare apples with
apples.
Nom - 05 Dec 2005 08:57 GMT
> Thanks Ken
> It sounds as if your gauge is behaving in a similar manner to mine,
> which could suggest a design factor is involved. I am keen to hear
> from other owners, particularly V6 owners, just to compare apples with
> apples.
Mine is perfectly accurate, so I don't think it's a design-factor !
2001 D9 Coupe here - what's yours ?
Ken - 06 Dec 2005 00:35 GMT
Well mine is sufficiently accurate - the errors were on the safe side.
And the variation was small - from just below half-a-tank to just
above.
Sedan.
anvil - 06 Dec 2005 07:26 GMT
I can accept that. I am still getting used to a 'gas-guzzler' compared
to the Fiat Punto 1200cc that we otherwise drive around the city! My
biggest car previously was a 2000cc.
anvil - 06 Dec 2005 07:22 GMT
1998 V6 saloon. There may have been a batch that behave erratically.
Madrigo Padrigo - 08 Dec 2005 18:17 GMT
Mine moves very erratically. 406 LXDT 1998
anvil - 09 Dec 2005 14:23 GMT
Thanks Madrigo Padrigo. Same year....interesting.