> I think mine is 45mpg driving gently some town some motorway use. Was
> hoping it would match the 205 D which strangely always fot 50 wherever
> you drove and at whatever speed (strange).
> > I think mine is 45mpg driving gently some town some motorway use. Was
> > hoping it would match the 205 D which strangely always fot 50 wherever
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> cheers
> John
I got 47mpg on a run from London to Stirling, in my 405 TD estate, four
people and luggage, keeping to a steady 75 ish. On short very journeys it
was rather worse, nearer 40mpg. The general figure was around 45. I used to
do a 20 mile (each way) commute into west London.
>> I think mine is 45mpg driving gently some town some motorway use. Was
>> hoping it would match the 205 D which strangely always fot 50 wherever
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> driving, but it does depend on your speed. Keep it under 70mph and economy
> will improve)
My old normaly aspirated 405 always averaged 50Mpg regardless of town or
country, speed or conditions.
A bit like the OPs 205.
In fact I still miss that car! They were more comfortable and better
visibility than a 406.
I noticed a marked drop when I moved to my first turbo1900 in a 406 (around
42Mpg)
Now it's back up to a 49ish average again with a Hdi 90 406.
(Ok that's beliveing the onboard computer, I can't be bothered tank checking
these dayz)
Just my personnal experience, I wouldn't say flak,
there are a mass of factors affecting fuel consumption on any model.
jim.
Chris - 08 Dec 2005 17:14 GMT
>>>I think mine is 45mpg driving gently some town some motorway use. Was
>>>hoping it would match the 205 D which strangely always fot 50 wherever
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> jim.
MY 405 IS DOING 48-50 MPG DEPENDING ON HOW I DRIVE IT ,ON A RUN TO THE
COAST IT RUNS VERY WELL, DOWN TO LITTLEHAMPTON AND BACK TO J11 M25 ON £6
NOT BAD FOR A OLD CAR,
Keith Willcocks - 09 Dec 2005 18:05 GMT
>>> I think mine is 45mpg driving gently some town some motorway use. Was
>>> hoping it would match the 205 D which strangely always fot 50 wherever
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Just my personnal experience, I wouldn't say flak,
> there are a mass of factors affecting fuel consumption on any model.
I agree totally about the 405 being better in many ways than the 406,
especially the 405's bigger boot. Re consumption, I used to have to record
my fuels use on a spreadsheet because it was a company car and still do it
from habit. My normally aspirated 1.9 diesel 405 used to average 42mpg and
the 406 HDI 110 does 46mpg.

Signature
Keith Willcocks
(If you can't laugh at life, it ain't worth living!)