>Not really sure what you are talking about, my 110 certainly
>reacts quicker on the throttle than my old 90 ever did, in
>fact the 110 performance is far superior to the 90. Even a
>remapped 90 will not match a 110 for performance.
Turbo lag, is the time constant between putting your foot down and the
time the turbo kicks in. the bigger the turbo, the larger the lag.
since the 90 Bhp uses a smaller turbo the lag is shorter, however if
the 110 turbo kicks in the violence is far more noticable
remapping a 90bhp will make it a very drivable car, only slighty
slower on the startgrid than a 110Bhp because it still lack's the
intercooler.
remapping a 110 version will reduce not reduce the turbo lag, but you
can chose to spin up the turbo at an earlier stage thus making it less
noticable.
PSA also found this to be the case and made a 136Bhp version which
mainly differs from the 110 in the mapping of the ECU
Now how about your non turbo 90 Bhp version?
Mr Benny - 03 Feb 2006 18:46 GMT
"Marc Amsterdam" <reply@newsgroup.only> wrote in message
> PSA also found this to be the case and made a 136Bhp version which
> mainly differs from the 110 in the mapping of the ECU
So its nothing to do with the higher pressure injection or the 16 valves
then? I must learn more about engines!
Ben (2.0 HDI 110 and power-boxed to around 140)