Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Peugeot Cars / September 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Peugeot 406 trade-in value

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Springy - 23 Sep 2007 18:13 GMT
Hi All,

I'm thinking of trading-in my Pug for a Focus, but I don't know if I am
getting shafted or not over the trade-in offered.

The car is a 2002 406 Rapier 1966 HDI 90BHP model, 67570 miles, FSH,
good condition, mot due in Jan '08, and I am being offered £2000 trade-in.

Is this reasonable for this age and mileage?

TIA,

Neil.
Chrs - 23 Sep 2007 18:15 GMT
Why trade it in? better to know the car you got than get more trouble
from another one. i think you could get more for it if you tryed.A
Ford Focus, what a let down more trouble than they are worth.
Springy - 23 Sep 2007 19:09 GMT
> Why trade it in? better to know the car you got than get more trouble
> from another one. i think you could get more for it if you tryed.A
> Ford Focus, what a let down more trouble than they are worth.

Because my 406 is six years old, is due for a 72k timing belt change,
and newsgroups like this have scared me away from keeping the car any
longer, with talk of expensive fuel pump, water pump, turbo failures
etc. Besides, if I get a 6 month-old Focus I am also buying 2.5 year's
manufacturer's warranty. With the stories I have heard in here I cannot
see why you should think that Focuses are more trouble than they're
worth. I admit that I will be sorry to see the car go, but it has to go
sometime.

Neil.
Malc - 23 Sep 2007 21:18 GMT
>> Why trade it in? better to know the car you got than get more trouble
>> from another one. i think you could get more for it if you tryed.A
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> they're worth. I admit that I will be sorry to see the car go, but it
> has to go sometime.

As the owner of a 1998 406 with 130K on the clock and no serious problems so
far I have to disagree. The timing belt change cost me about £140 IIRC and,
if your car is due one, then a purchaser with some knowledge will offer you
a bit less knowing that it has to be done.

Signature

Malc

Springy - 23 Sep 2007 22:24 GMT
>>> Why trade it in?

> As the owner of a 1998 406 with 130K on the clock and no serious problems so
> far I have to disagree. The timing belt change cost me about £140 IIRC and,
> if your car is due one, then a purchaser with some knowledge will offer you
> a bit less knowing that it has to be done.

Nice answer. I am slowly coming around to treating my 406 to a good
valet and keeping it going. I do < 10k p.a. and at that rate it should
last me another 6 years, according to your mileage. As I said earlier, I
would be sorry to see it go.

Neil.
John Duffey - 25 Sep 2007 00:14 GMT
> Nice answer. I am slowly coming around to treating my 406 to a good
> valet and keeping it going. I do < 10k p.a. and at that rate it should
> last me another 6 years, according to your mileage. As I said earlier, I
> would be sorry to see it go.

My 1999 petrol 1.8 has just turned over 145k with no major problems.
Timing belt was done again at about 140k - probably later than
recommended, but there we go.

Strongly recommend keeping yours - why bother going for the
familiarisation of a new car unless you have to? Better the devil, as they
say.

John
djimbo - 23 Sep 2007 22:27 GMT
>>> Why trade it in? better to know the car you got than get more trouble
>>> from another one. i think you could get more for it if you tryed.A
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> and, if your car is due one, then a purchaser with some knowledge will
> offer you a bit less knowing that it has to be done.

Yep it's the first thing looked for in the service book apart from the fact
that it has actualy been serviced.
I've just clocked over the 100K in my 2000 HDi90 which (touch wood) hasn't
suffered any major problems.
I think you find the horror stories don't neccesserily reflect the average
user's experiences, but they do stick in the mind.
Having said all that, I think they're having a laugh at a £2K trade in on a
new(ish) focus (imo).. at that rate mine's worth about ten bob.
Check the guides for trade in price there's one on the net somewhere isn't
there?

Djimbo

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Springy - 23 Sep 2007 22:29 GMT
> Yep it's the first thing looked for in the service book apart from the fact
> that it has actualy been serviced.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Djimbo

Ta djimbo, another one adding positives to why I should not change.

Neil.
Zoab - 24 Sep 2007 12:25 GMT
>> Yep it's the first thing looked for in the service book apart from the
>> fact that it has actualy been serviced.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Neil.

There is always a problem with assessing a cars reliability when reading
news groups, Pug owners tend only to ask advice about problems when they
happen, the satisfied owners seldom come on to the news group at all, of
which I am one. I have had my 406 for 3 years  and have never had any
problems at all. I am not able to give statistics on the car, but I would
think that the percentage of problems is very small, when you think about
the 1000's of Pugs on the road, and talk to Pug drivers, they are normally
very satisfied with the car, I most certainly am, it's reliable, certainly
not thirsty ( Av 44 mpg ), and for a diesel very sporty.

Bryan
Malc - 24 Sep 2007 21:28 GMT
> There is always a problem with assessing a cars reliability when
> reading news groups, Pug owners tend only to ask advice about
> problems when they happen, the satisfied owners seldom come on to the
> news group at all.

Very true.

> I have had my 406 for 3 years and have never had any problems at all. I am
> not able to give
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> with the car, I most certainly am, it's reliable, certainly not
> thirsty ( Av 44 mpg ), and for a diesel very sporty.

I've had my 1998 petrol one for just about 18 months now. No problems
despite it having done 130k miles. I had the cam belt changed as a
precaution when I got it and I had to replace the front disks 6 months ago.
It's not particularly economical, 33mpg at motorway speeds, but it's very
comfortable, it's an estate so there's bags of room and it's got climate
control which works well. If I have one quibble it is only that it could do
with a CD radio instead of a tape unit.

Signature

Malc

%%stu%% - 25 Sep 2007 18:14 GMT
> Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Is this reasonable for this age and mileage?

Back in March I traded in a 11/2003 406 110 hdi SE which had done 70k.  It
was in good nick apart from a few dings and a dent in the bonnet. The garage
offered 3.5K  which I bargained to 4k.  This was against a 407  coupe hdi GT
so the garage had some  areas to play with in the financing.

In some ways I wished I hadn't changed so I've been and bought a 01/04  hdi
90 406 estate S model.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.