Hi,
> I really wouldn't chance any proportion of petrol in a common rail car. For
> the sake of losing the cost of a tank of fuel VS the cost of swapping the
> pumps, it'd be the tank of fuel that's swapped every time for me.
Eeeer, pumps, injectors... Mostly all of the fuel line indeed, if the engine
doesn't burn in the meanwhile !
A friend of mine (OK, a friend of mine's wife) filled up her 406 HDI with
petrol. She saw it immediately and called the hauler, she just had to cope
with a tank flush, seems to run fine anyway.
I've heard of a guy which did the same with a Safrane 2.5TD (crappy engine
anyway) and didn't realize - I won't explain the details of the story - and
despite being an old-class Diesel, had to change fuel line and the complete
engine.
Regards,
--
G.T
Keith W - 01 May 2008 16:43 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> complete
> engine.
They must have been tougher in the 60's. A colleague tried to save me some
hassle and filled up the Morris LD diesel Royal Mail van that I was to drive
that afternoon. Unfortunately, the petrol and diesel pumps being side by
side, he filled it with petrol.
I arrived and went on my trip and for the first 5 or 6 miles it ran fine but
then started to kangaroo a bit. Fortunately my journey took me past the
workshops so I pulled in and, after examining it, they told me it wasn't a
f###ing two stroke.
They drained the tank, refilled with diesel, bled it and sent me on my way.
It ran fine for some years after that.
The pumps in the yard were hand operated and shortly after that, the same
colleague put the petrol hose in a van and proceeded to turn the handle on
the diesel pump. Unfortunately he was standing directly below the nozzle.
Ruined his suit and his car stunk for weeks because he'd driven home in it
to change.

Signature
Keith Willcocks
(If you can't laugh at life, it ain't worth living)