> If I was to plan to run 500rwhp, would I be doing too much work on the
> tranny of a 96 Trans Am? How about the engine? Would 500rwhp be too
> much for it? Anyone the the highest that the tranny and engine can
> take?
Maybe you should mention if it's an auto or manual. Maybe if you're
worrying about what the engine can take you are blowing bullshit.

Signature
CB
When the going gets weird,
the weird STILL turn pro.
GLK9MM - 25 Aug 2004 00:22 GMT
>>If I was to plan to run 500rwhp, would I be doing too much work on the
>>tranny of a 96 Trans Am? How about the engine? Would 500rwhp be too
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Maybe you should mention if it's an auto or manual. Maybe if you're
> worrying about what the engine can take you are blowing bullshit.
Also would help to know the numbers on the tranny.
Some stock models from that year were rated ~325hp, some ~350hp, some
400hp+.
Martin
'01 Formula - MTI Air Box Lid, K&N Filter, Hurst-6,
SLP Cold Air Induction & Smooth Intake Bellow
Corsa Catback w/Premium Tips
'83 V45 Magna