Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Pontiac / Pontiac Firebird / July 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

1980 Firebird

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Allan - 08 May 2007 08:09 GMT
Hi all,

I have alot to learn about this car I just bought. It's a 1980 Firebird,
 supposed to have a 400 Big Block, does have an Edlebroch 4barrel carb.
No headers but nice exhaust system, I think, sounds nice anyways. The
car has a Hurst shifter.

I picked it up last fall and towed it home as I didn't even know whether
it even ran or not. Got it cheap enough and plan to restore and do some
customizing over time. At least that what the plan is. Body is pretty
decent, not all rusted out, not even rusted inside the trunk and
wheelwells and is good and straight. Except for the doors, they need to
be re-adjusted.

About a month ago I thought, I wonder if it runs, so gave it a try and
after a few pumps on the pedal it fired right up. Damn, I thought, this
is not too bad, no smoke, runs reasonably well. Warmed it up, tried to
move it and after figuring out how the shifter worked, got it into
reverse. Tried to move it forward, worked just fine. Shut it down,
restarted it and shut it down again. Checked the belts, replaced the
steering belt, changed the air cleaner filter, changed the oil/filter,
checked the trans and then added the plates. I wanted to run this around
locally here to see what it all needed.

Needs shocks, needs brakes, needs a wheel alignment. But holy cow, this
thing moves! Have to dig deep in the pockets though, for fuel money!

The thing that puzzles me though is this. How do I know for sure it's a
400 Big Block and not a 350? One thing that I did notice was the
distributor shaft, it sits at a bit of an angle and not straight up and
down like a 350 would.

Thanks

Allan
Ed.Toronto@gmail.com - 08 May 2007 23:26 GMT
> Hi all,
>
> I have alot to learn about this car I just bought. It's a 1980Firebird,
>   supposed to have a 400 Big Block, does have an Edlebroch 4barrel carb.
> No headers but nice exhaust system, I think, sounds nice anyways. The
> car has a Hurst shifter.

There's no Chev "400 big block".  It could conceivably be a Pontiac
400.  Any 400-sized engine would not be original. The Chev 305 was the
largest engine found in a 1980 Firebird; a turbo 301 was the most
powerful.

> steering belt, changed the air cleaner filter, changed the oil/filter

How did you get the right filter when you don't know the engine?  A
Pontiac 400 uses an AC Delco PF24 if I recall....

> The thing that puzzles me though is this. How do I know for sure it's a
> 400 Big Block and not a 350? One thing that I did notice was the
> distributor shaft, it sits at a bit of an angle and not straight up and
> down like a 350 would.

1)  What does the emissions sticker say the original engine was?  What
is the engine VIN code (there's lots of second-gen Firebird info on
the Web, I'm sure there's a VIN decoder for these cars somewhere).

2)  Do the exhaust manifold bolt flush to the heads (Chev), or do the
heads have stub exhausts curving downwards to which the exhaust
manifolds are attached (Pontiac)?  If the oil filler is a tall tube at
the front of the engine, maybe it's an Olds 403!  (But I doubt it.)
Allan - 09 May 2007 22:45 GMT
>>Hi all,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> largest engine found in a 1980 Firebird; a turbo 301 was the most
> powerful.

The engine is certainly not the original IMHO, I've had quite a few
people locally here look at it and most say that it looks to be an Olds
engine. Even the valve covers are not stock. But not one of these folks
were 100% certain. It's Canadian if that matters. One chap said it
looked like a 350 but was puzzled why the distributor was at a slight
angle. Not a loose cap either nor a bent shaft, it wouldn't run at all.
Engine runs excellent.

>>steering belt, changed the air cleaner filter, changed the oil/filter
>
> How did you get the right filter when you don't know the engine?  A
> Pontiac 400 uses an AC Delco PF24 if I recall....

Had to compare to what was on there to what would fit. It's not the
original aircleaner either but rather a racing style of chrome thing.

>>The thing that puzzles me though is this. How do I know for sure it's a
>>400 Big Block and not a 350? One thing that I did notice was the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> is the engine VIN code (there's lots of second-gen Firebird info on
> the Web, I'm sure there's a VIN decoder for these cars somewhere).

I'm going to get that number off the car. May be in luck at this website:

http://www.autofacts.ca/classics/VIN/Pontiac.htm#PontiacFirebird72-80

> 2)  Do the exhaust manifold bolt flush to the heads (Chev), or do the
> heads have stub exhausts curving downwards to which the exhaust
> manifolds are attached (Pontiac)?  If the oil filler is a tall tube at
> the front of the engine, maybe it's an Olds 403!  (But I doubt it.)

This I have to check, will post once I've had a chance to go under the
hood again.

Thanks

Allan
Allan - 09 May 2007 23:22 GMT
The car has these things under the hood:

Edelbroch Torker Pontiac Intake
Heads have stub exhaust, not mounted directly to the heads
Oil filler is in the valve covers, these are M/T covers, no sign of any
oil filler tube at the front of the engine.

According to the VIN:

1980 Pontiac Base Firebird Sport Coupe, date of manufacture 11/79 and
according to the VIN 5th digit engine code "A" in my case, it came out
with a 231 2bbl V6. Assembly plant was Norwood, OH.

This is like no V6 I've ever seen! So, this car has been apparently
modified. And it Rocks and Rolls!

Allan

>>> Hi all,
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>
> Allan
Ed.Toronto@gmail.com - 10 May 2007 15:51 GMT
> The car has these things under the hood:
>
> Edelbroch Torker Pontiac Intake
> Heads have stub exhaust, not mounted directly to the heads
> Oil filler is in the valve covers, these are M/T covers, no sign of any
> oil filler tube at the front of the engine.

Well, that's a Pontiac engine for sure. However, it could be a 350,
400, or 455. (Engine mount issues rule out old 326, 389, 421, 428; and
the 265/301 don't take aftermarket intakes.)

There should be a two-digit code stamped on the front of the block
(for example YC or X7), somewhere down by the lower pulley. There
should also be a cast code on the paired centre exhaust ports, for
example 6X. Your carb is likely not original (do Quadrajets even fit
on a Torker?), but your distributor may have a code on it somewhere--
it's HEI, right?

These codes, taken together, may give a reasonable idea of what the
engine is.  There are various other tricks used, but I'm only familiar
with them at third-hand: my Trans Am has a Pontiac 400, and has always
had a Pontiac 400 (although I suspect the current engine is a service
replacement).

> According to the VIN:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> This is like no V6 I've ever seen! So, this car has been apparently
> modified. And it Rocks and Rolls!

It probably does not have Saf-T-Trak (Pontiac's trade name for a
limited-slip rear end), and it would not have the nice factory gauge
package that Formulas or Trans Ams have.  Neither will it have the
heavy-duty suspension with sway bars front and back.  Ten years ago
you could get a load of parts from the junkyards for these cars, but
these days it's rare to see any second-gen F-body in the yard, and any
in there are picked down to the rusted-out carcass--at least here in
Ontario.
Allan - 10 May 2007 21:48 GMT
>>The car has these things under the hood:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> 400, or 455. (Engine mount issues rule out old 326, 389, 421, 428; and
> the 265/301 don't take aftermarket intakes.)

There is a code stamped in, it is right above and to the left of the
water pump if looking at the engine from the front of the car. This says
XA. There looks to be another one lower and to the right but is in
behind the water pump, just out of sight enough not to be able to make
out what it is, no way to get to this unless the water pump is removed.
This second one looks to be casted on the block rather than stamped
though due to being raised lettering.

On the left center exhaust port it says 6X.

Haven't gotten to the ditributor yet or to get numbers off the carb.

Can I e-mail you some photos? You can e-mail me directly.

For parts I can check with SGI in Saskatoon, they may have something,
maybe not.

Thanks

Allan

> There should be a two-digit code stamped on the front of the block
> (for example YC or X7), somewhere down by the lower pulley. There
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> in there are picked down to the rusted-out carcass--at least here in
> Ontario.
Ed.Toronto@gmail.com - 11 May 2007 15:47 GMT
> Ed.Toro...@gmail.com wrote:

> > Well, that's a Pontiac engine for sure. However, it could be a 350,
> > 400, or 455. (Engine mount issues rule out old 326, 389, 421, 428; and
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> This second one looks to be casted on the block rather than stamped
> though due to being raised lettering.

There are a few Pontiac engines with XA codes.  The most likely is the
1977 180 HP 400. You can see a good list of engine codes at
http://www.pontiacpower.org/engine.htm

> On the left center exhaust port it says 6X.

This is consistent with a '77 engine; Pontiac 350s and 400s came with
6X heads from about '76 to the end of production in '78/'79.

> Haven't gotten to the ditributor yet or to get numbers off the carb.

I can't seem to find my Pontiac Firebird Red Book, which may have
distributor numbers. If the carb is a Rochester Quadrajet (big
secondaries closed off at the top with flaps) the part number would be
interesting to follow up.

The 180 HP 400 had low 7.6:1 compression and a pretty small camshaft.
Of course the intake on your car has been changed, so who knows if the
compression had been increased or the camshaft changed.  There is
nothing wrong in principle with the 6X heads--they are getting more
and more credibility as some of the better-flowing stock heads Pontiac
made.

You may want to replace the Torker intake with an Edelbrock Performer
or Performer RPM. The Torker is a way old-school intake; good for
really high RPMs, but the Performer RPM would make a much better
intake if you're keeping it below 6000 RPM. And that's a good idea
with a Pontiac with unknown internal components and unknown build
quality--you don't want to get rod knock.

Hopefully your trans came with the engine, or the original V6 trans
was strengthened. No problems with the rear end, although it's a
mystery what gear ratio you would have.

> Can I e-mail you some photos? You can e-mail me directly.

You can send them to ed.toronto@gmail.com; I check that every few days
anyway.

> For parts I can check with SGI in Saskatoon, they may have something,
> maybe not.

Well, less rust in Saskatchewan than in Toronto!
noimeanyes@hotmail.com - 05 Jul 2007 07:29 GMT
This is a little off topic, but I need to replace a '99 Firebird v6
engine and I have no experience with automobile repair at all. I have
three things I would really like to get some information on:
1. I was wondering how hard it would be to replace it myself with very
limited knowledge.
2. I could use an opinion on what DIY Engine Replacement Manuel would
be best for a beginner.
3. The transmission is also going out, would it be easier to replace
the transmission at the same time as the engine or would it be out of
my ability to do myself?
I appreciate any help you all can give.
noi - 22 Jul 2007 17:05 GMT
> This is a little off topic, but I need to replace a '99 Firebird v6
> engine and I have no experience with automobile repair at all. I have
> three things I would really like to get some information on:
> 1. I was wondering how hard it would be to replace it myself with very
> limited knowledge.

 If you've never done this before on any car, I don't recommend trying
on this year.

> 2. I could use an opinion on what DIY Engine Replacement Manuel would
> be best for a beginner.
> 3. The transmission is also going out, would it be easier to replace
> the transmission at the same time as the engine or would it be out of
> my ability to do myself?
> I appreciate any help you all can give.

 If you do go ahead with this, replacing the tranny at the same time
would be best...

                    NOI
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.