Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Pontiac / Pontiac Firebird / November 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

2001 Trans Am Ram Air: HOW FAST?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Edd Dicker - 17 Nov 2007 01:53 GMT
Putting aside all the egos and non-stock mods, I have a basic question:

How fast can a stock 2001 Trans Am, Ram Air 325 HP Car really do?

Thanks for the input.
Edd
NoOption5L@aol.com - 17 Nov 2007 02:58 GMT
> Putting aside all the egos and non-stock mods, I have a basic question:

> How fast can a stock 2001 Trans Am, Ram Air 325 HP Car really do?

> Edd

On a good track with a good driver I've seen some car magazine road
tests get a 12.9 @ 108-110 mph in the 1/4.  A more average Joe, with
some practice, should be able to get a sub 13.5.

Patrick
'93 Cobra
Joe Granto - 19 Nov 2007 15:03 GMT
>Putting aside all the egos and non-stock mods, I have a basic question:
>How fast can a stock 2001 Trans Am, Ram Air 325 HP Car really do?

0-60 times are barely above 5 seconds, usually around 5.1 or 5.2.
Braking is not impressive; stock brakes suck, IMO. I have the 6-speed
manual, and have been told that the automatic is actually quite good,
and offers good launches and is better than a manual unless you really
practice and know what you are doing.
lab~rat  >:-) - 19 Nov 2007 20:35 GMT
>>Putting aside all the egos and non-stock mods, I have a basic question:
>>How fast can a stock 2001 Trans Am, Ram Air 325 HP Car really do?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>and offers good launches and is better than a manual unless you really
>practice and know what you are doing.

I have to agree with you on the brakes.  I have a SS Camaro and the
brakes are the weakest link.  Before doing ANY performance mods, you'd
be nuts not to upgrade the brakes.  What was GM thinking?
--
lab~rat  >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
NoOption5L@aol.com - 19 Nov 2007 23:48 GMT
> I have to agree with you on the brakes.  I have a SS Camaro and the
> brakes are the weakest link.  Before doing ANY performance mods, you'd
> be nuts not to upgrade the brakes.  What was GM thinking?

lab~rat,

You think your Camaro brakes are bad.  You should sample brakes on a
Fox Mustang.  Even my Cobra with 4-wheel discs (the only Fox Mustang
that came with rear discs) are horrible.

Patrick
'93 Cobra
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.