> Putting aside all the egos and non-stock mods, I have a basic question:
> How fast can a stock 2001 Trans Am, Ram Air 325 HP Car really do?
> Edd
On a good track with a good driver I've seen some car magazine road
tests get a 12.9 @ 108-110 mph in the 1/4. A more average Joe, with
some practice, should be able to get a sub 13.5.
Patrick
'93 Cobra
>Putting aside all the egos and non-stock mods, I have a basic question:
>How fast can a stock 2001 Trans Am, Ram Air 325 HP Car really do?
0-60 times are barely above 5 seconds, usually around 5.1 or 5.2.
Braking is not impressive; stock brakes suck, IMO. I have the 6-speed
manual, and have been told that the automatic is actually quite good,
and offers good launches and is better than a manual unless you really
practice and know what you are doing.
lab~rat >:-) - 19 Nov 2007 20:35 GMT
>>Putting aside all the egos and non-stock mods, I have a basic question:
>>How fast can a stock 2001 Trans Am, Ram Air 325 HP Car really do?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>and offers good launches and is better than a manual unless you really
>practice and know what you are doing.
I have to agree with you on the brakes. I have a SS Camaro and the
brakes are the weakest link. Before doing ANY performance mods, you'd
be nuts not to upgrade the brakes. What was GM thinking?
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
NoOption5L@aol.com - 19 Nov 2007 23:48 GMT
> I have to agree with you on the brakes. I have a SS Camaro and the
> brakes are the weakest link. Before doing ANY performance mods, you'd
> be nuts not to upgrade the brakes. What was GM thinking?
lab~rat,
You think your Camaro brakes are bad. You should sample brakes on a
Fox Mustang. Even my Cobra with 4-wheel discs (the only Fox Mustang
that came with rear discs) are horrible.
Patrick
'93 Cobra