> Why has Pontiac now gone to the more powerful yet smaller 3.6 eng as
> an option over the 3.9 eng. ?
> Is the 3.6 a better design? I can't find any technical info on this
> engine...is it a new redesigned engine or a rehash? Why is GM so fast
> to change engines in this car so fast after only 1.5 years. Anyone
> know the scoop on the 3.6?
Why not? The 3.6 is a beautiful little engine. DOHC with variable
valve timing, all aluminum engine, very similar overall design to the
Northstar. Of course, there isn't anything really wrong with the
3.9 either. It looks like a 3.4 but there are some major differences.
The 3.6 has been around in Caddy's for a couple of years.
Ian
Mal Osborne - 25 Dec 2006 13:31 GMT
>> Why has Pontiac now gone to the more powerful yet smaller 3.6 eng as
>> an option over the 3.9 eng. ?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> 3.9 either. It looks like a 3.4 but there are some major differences.
> The 3.6 has been around in Caddy's for a couple of years.
Australian Holden Commodores use these engines, in RWD form, and also have
for a few years. There are two versions offered, both 3.6, with 180 or 195
KW, the more powerful version has variable valve timing on both inlet &
exhaust, while the base model just has variable inlet timing. The Pontiac
web site specs this motor as 188KW (252Hp). Rougly mid way between the two
Holden specs. Feedback I have heard is that the 195KW version has a
sportier feel, and sounds better, more improvement than the numbers would
indicate.
Any idea which motor the G6 is using? The 195KW version with a crappy
exhaust & stricter emission requirements, or the 180KW with a better exhaust
& tweaked a little?
Either way, IMHO it's as much HP as you would want to put to the ground
through the front wheels on a car that size.
The Australian Commodores are bigger & RWD.
Hickabob McCrane - 30 Dec 2006 05:57 GMT
> >> Why has Pontiac now gone to the more powerful yet smaller 3.6 eng as
> >> an option over the 3.9 eng. ?
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> Either way, IMHO it's as much HP as you would want to put to the ground
> through the front wheels on a car that size.
Den...dat;s what I'm talk'n bout!
Homie J. - 25 Dec 2006 18:23 GMT
>> Why has Pontiac now gone to the more powerful yet smaller 3.6 eng as
>> an option over the 3.9 eng. ?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Ian
Then what will happen to the 3.9?...not that I would miss it...I thought it
was a big lug anyway...almost 4 litres and bearily putting out 250hp, and
only putting out 227hp in the G6 convertible. I say good riddance if they
are all replaced with the 3.6. Smaller more compact, better gas mileage and
more powerful. If pontiac gets around to to putting one in the G6 GTP
convertible I may very well get one. I can't tolerate only 227 measly horses
out of a big 3.9.
Joe - 25 Dec 2006 20:45 GMT
>>> Why has Pontiac now gone to the more powerful yet smaller 3.6 eng as
>>> an option over the 3.9 eng. ?
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> G6 GTP convertible I may very well get one. I can't tolerate only 227
> measly horses out of a big 3.9.
The 3.9 is supposed to be the low priced engine, although it does have
variable valve timing and a variable length intake manifold. I'm not sure
they really need it, and I suppose they don't need it if it fails to be
econoimcal. It might go away at any time.
Hickabob McCrane - 30 Dec 2006 05:55 GMT
> >>> Why has Pontiac now gone to the more powerful yet smaller 3.6 eng as
> >>> an option over the 3.9 eng. ?
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> they really need it, and I suppose they don't need it if it fails to be
> econoimcal. It might go away at any time.
I hope the time will be sooner than later.