Ty so much for responding to my last post, you were very helpful.
Basically i already test drove a 4 cylinder and i was very happy with
the speed it goes for a 4 cylinder. Also, alot of 4 cylinders already
have power windows, power locks, air bags etc and a pretty good stereo
system already. Imo, unless you plan on racing then why do you really
need to upgrade to a v6 when a 4 cylinder is enough for you? A gt is way
out of my price range and t me that's more of a show car then anything
else and like you im not too big on the 2 doors either. I also find the
4 cylinders to be much cheaper as far as insurance goes and much better
on fuel. Also, the ppl that i know that have v6's and gt's pay over 300
a month on insurance. Do you think a 4 cylinder is fast enough as far as
getting to where you need to go? and last i checked the 5 speed was only
available with a 4 cylinder. So overall, do you think 4 cylinders handle
pretty good on the road? And also your sister must be rich to purchase a
brand new gt. thanks again
Sorry Peter, I kind of lost this thread in the clutter that is my
newsreader.
> Ty so much for responding to my last post, you were very helpful.
> Basically i already test drove a 4 cylinder and i was very happy with
> the speed it goes for a 4 cylinder. Also, alot of 4 cylinders already
> have power windows, power locks, air bags etc and a pretty good stereo
> system already. Imo, unless you plan on racing then why do you really
> need to upgrade to a v6 when a 4 cylinder is enough for you?
I personally, have always liked the 6 cylinder's. I just think the 4's don't
have enough power to get me going on the highway. But, like I said, that is
totally personal preference. If you are happy with the power from a 4
cylinder, then that would be the way to go.
> A gt is way out of my price range and t me that's more of a show car then
> anything
> else and like you im not too big on the 2 doors either.
The GT's are basically a 'tougher' version of the Grand Am. Dual exaust,
leather (sometimes), awesome stereo, awesome chrome rims (sometimes), but
that is all preferance too. If you want something that just get's you from
point A to point B, then go for the cheaper one.
> I also find the 4 cylinders to be much cheaper as far as insurance goes
> and much better
> on fuel.
4's will usually get better mileage, but my sisters V6 (3.4L) get's damned
good mileage, and can go like a bat out of hell.
> Also, the ppl that i know that have v6's and gt's pay over 300
> a month on insurance.
Insurance all depends on age, gender, driving, and stuff like that. I own a
'96 Bonneville, that is top of the line, with a supercharged engine, and I
only pay $77 a month to insure it, with full coverage. If you are under 25,
or have speeding tickets, then yes, you will be paying much more. The
insurance companies usually consider the GT's more 'sportier' then the
regular models.
> Do you think a 4 cylinder is fast enough as far as
> getting to where you need to go?
Like I said, it's all personal preference. My car has a good 60 horse-power
over my sister's Grand Am, and I can certainly tell the difference when I
drive her car, but her car will still move damned quick.
> and last i checked the 5 speed was only
> available with a 4 cylinder.
I haven't seen many 5-speed's in Grand Am's around here (Ontario, Canada). I
have seen a few Oldsmobile Alero's (the sister-car of the Grand Am) with the
5 speed, but I don't think I have ever seen a Grand Am with one up close.
> So overall, do you think 4 cylinders handle
> pretty good on the road? And also your sister must be rich to purchase a
> brand new gt. thanks again
Well, if you are talking about going from point A to point B, then sure, the
4 cylinder is great. If you want to be able to do 0-60 in 7.7 seconds, and
corner like a sports car, then the GT is the way to go. As for my sister,
she's not rich. She actually leased the brand new Grand Am, but decided to
purchase the older one after the brand new one was wrote off.
Anyhow, good luck to you on your purchase, which ever way you go! :)