Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Pontiac / Pontiac Cars / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Toyota car models and could this be the reason why U.S. Car sales are     falling?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
admin@findauto-parts.com - 09 Feb 2008 21:19 GMT
Does any one know why Toyota changes model styles every two years??
Toyota always seems to be a step ahead of the game. I own a parts
company and for years the Toyota models have changed for almost every
model for every two year periods. For instance almost every Camry
model made the headlights will only work in two year increments. This
being said almost every part changes (example: fenders, bumpers, and
the way the hood would line up with the lights) I sometimes wander if
they do this for keep the parts ever changing to keep the junk yards
out of business. I come up with this because to many junkyards they
purchase american cars for the reason one Ford Taurus hood can fit for
six years for a model, or a Chevy Truck fender for instance 1888-2000
is the same fender. So again the question remains. Why does Toyota
constantly chage every two years for all models?? Also is this the
change that keeps the company growing every year closer to the #1
spot??

Thanks, Shane
National Auto Part
WWW.NATIONALAUTOPART.COM
brxsep - 20 Feb 2008 03:17 GMT
On Feb 9, 4:19 pm, ad...@findauto-parts.com wrote:
> Does any one know why Toyota changes model styles every two years??
> Toyota always seems to be a step ahead of the game. I own a parts
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> National Auto Part
> WWW.NATIONALAUTOPART.COM

When you are rolling in cash as # 1, you can afford to change every
two years.  Toyota has perfect the art of incremental improvements.
So two years is the right amount of time to identify, design and
implement a change.  While improving the product, its also time to
freshen up the product line up.  People always want 'the new', so
Toyota is giving them just that.

Not to say US auto makers haven't done this in the past.  Look at Ford
and the history of the Mustang.  !964 to 1966 no change in body.  1967
and 1968, new body.  1969 and 1970 same body.  1971 to 1973 (age of
the large Mustang) the same body.

Which is right?  GM history is running long of body.  Example 1970 to
1981 the Firebirds didn't change (there was a switch over in radator
support in 1973 that resulted in a change to the front fender stamping
but from 1973 to 1981 the finders are interchangeable.)  Now options,
motors, fabrics did ajust over the 11 years, but for the discussion
here it the same car body.

While I am the kind of guy that doesn't like a whole lot of change,
I'm not the average car buyer (replace a car about every 11 years.)

Toyota has found the fountain of youth in its two year change over.
Plus has the cash/market share to pull it off.  However, GM is trying
to over come decades of non-car guy, bean counter, MBA textbook
managers (just for the record I do have my MBA.)  Can they do it?  Ya,
think they will make it.  Will they do it with a car line call
Pontiac?  Its going to depend on if the market wants a performance car
line from the General.  Autoweek in early Feb. 08 stated the Firebird
is dead while the Camaro is a rocket ready for take-off.  Cross-over
vehicals are being rebadged under the GMC line.  I am afraid with oil
hitting $ 101/barrel the business case for Pontiac with a RWD/V-8 line-
up doesn't look to good.

Bottom line is Toyota has figured out the market and is nailing it
with new products.  GM lost the market due to poor management going
back to the decisions made in the early 1980's.  Its easiler to keep
on building on 28 years of improvements vs. playing catch up on 28
years of errors.

My two cents.
Bon·ne·ville - 20 Feb 2008 04:24 GMT
In article <89091ca4-8222-46b1-a0ca-2dd6bdcdf312
@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>, seppburgh2@aol.com SAYS IN VAIN...

> On Feb 9, 4:19 pm, ad...@findauto-parts.com wrote:

> > Thanks, Shane
> > National Auto Part
> > WWW.NATIONAL spam PART.COM

Wow... I didn't think anyone would reply to the spam troll.
I guess trolling is a effective new way to market sh.t online... Get
your website address published over and over by people taking your bait.
Marko - 18 Mar 2008 02:45 GMT
> Does any one know why Toyota changes model styles every two years??
> Toyota always seems to be a step ahead of the game. I own a parts
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> National Auto Part
> WWW.NATIONALAUTOPART.COM

Much newer factories built by US taxpayer dolllars ater the war. Some were
still being built in the 70s  and 80s. They have more investment dollars
than US companies.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.