Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Porsche / Porshe 944 / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

84 944 Oil in air cleaner

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
gk - 28 Dec 2006 01:42 GMT
I looked through the pdf parts diagram and I can't tell for sure if the
early 944's have a pcv valve or not.  I just pulled the air cleaner and
found a puddle of oil in the cleaner box.  It appears to be dripping
through the throttle body.  I'm assuming this could be from a clogged
pcv valve or a collapsed vacuum hose.  This engine does have qiute a
few miles on it and I haven't done a compression check yet  but it
still runs strong and seems ok.  The other related problem is a rythmic
noise at light throttle when parked and hot.  I'm thinking a rod
bearing but I'm also exploring timing belt slap and maybe even a pcv
valve clattering.  Thoughts?
William Noble - 28 Dec 2006 06:11 GMT
did you download the porsche factory service manual for your car from the
site in the UK that has it as a PDF?  it will answer some of your question -
I have an S that has this "feature" - I think it's due to worn valve guides
on my car, but not sure

>I looked through the pdf parts diagram and I can't tell for sure if the
> early 944's have a pcv valve or not.  I just pulled the air cleaner and
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> bearing but I'm also exploring timing belt slap and maybe even a pcv
> valve clattering.  Thoughts?

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

darthpup - 28 Dec 2006 11:08 GMT
Breather hose from timing belts housing is transfering oil vapors to
the air cleaner.  You probably need to replace the main bearing seal
and the two balance shaft seals.  If you have more than 40000 on
current set of timing belts then you need to replace them along with
the various pulleys.

Oil dripping from throttle housing?   Air flow valve?   You are seeing
the results of a bad oil leak  in the belt housing somewhere.

Old pulleys make a lot of noise when worn out on this engine.
gk - 28 Dec 2006 14:42 GMT
Ok, but what I don't get is why I don't see oil dripping from the belt
housing or even a wet oil misting in the belt housing.  I'd suspect if
there is enough to go back up and condense in the air cleaner to form a
puddle I'd see it in the housing too.

> Breather hose from timing belts housing is transfering oil vapors to
> the air cleaner.  You probably need to replace the main bearing seal
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Old pulleys make a lot of noise when worn out on this engine.
darthpup - 28 Dec 2006 15:00 GMT
Your reasoning is correct but I think the oil may only be leaking after
the engine gets hot.  Also, there is a time element involved.  What
mass of oil do you find in the air cleaner for what time period?  Days,
months?  
Does the engine use any oil?
What kind of oil are you using?
BGMedia - 28 Dec 2006 19:52 GMT
You may have worn valve guides, which is normal for a car of that
age/mileage.  Here's what could be happening:

Over time, from the valves moving up and down in the valve guides in
the head, the guides get a little worn.  These guides are lubricated
with oil, but they do eventually wear...  Anyhow, when the guides get
worn oil can be sucked out -- sucked out, because the piston's up and
down movement creates suction (this is what generates manifold vacuum
pressure).  For example, let's say the throttle body is closed at idle.
3 intake valves are closed, and 1 is opened while that cylinder is
sucking air into the combustion chamber.  The valves have their valve
guides exposed where the intake manifold bolts to the head, so the
suction from the piston behind the one open valve will cause a little
oil to seep out of the remaining three guides, because the closed
throttle body only lets in a wee little bit of air.  A little droplet
here and there will come out of the guides and over time, it all adds
up.

In the turbulent environment of the intake manifold, where the throttle
body is opening and closing, creating different levels of manifold
vacuum, this oil eventually coats everything, and will eventually
create a little puddle at the throttle body -- one of the low points of
the system (on turbos, the intercooler, and the turbo charger, are also
low points.).

Some of this oil will get consumed by the engine under normal
combustion, some will not combust and will come out as smoke, and some
will drip around in the intake tract.

If someone is following you, like at the track, and they see a little
puff of smoke at each shift point, that's a good sign of worn valve
guides.  When you shift, you take your foot off the gas, which closes
the throttle body, which creates a lot of vacuum, which causes some oil
to be sucked into the combustion chambers, which comes out as smoke.

Unless it's excessive, and the back of your car gets black and oily
from regular driving, I wouldn't worry about it.  You'll spend a lot of
money and just wind up minimizing the problem.  So, save your money and
enjoy the car for what it is -- a fun car that can deliver a lot of
performance!

Good luck!

> Your reasoning is correct but I think the oil may only be leaking after
> the engine gets hot.  Also, there is a time element involved.  What
> mass of oil do you find in the air cleaner for what time period?  Days,
> months?
> Does the engine use any oil?
> What kind of oil are you using?
gk - 28 Dec 2006 20:10 GMT
Ok,  well, I think it is time for the story behind this car so the
folks of this group who are way more knoweledgeable about 944s can
chime in.  Here goes...

Picked up this car locally in Rochester NY about 2 months ago.  Didn't
pay a whole lot for it but probably should have paid less (I paid
$1300).  It seemed to run well, vibrated while idling (I'm assuming bad
motor mounts) but the big flaw was that the transmission only worked in
1,3,5.  No 2,4,R and the guy had driven it this way for a year
supposedly that way.  The dealer claimed $500+ to fix it.  I brought it
home on the trailer and found a few other problems like wipers not
working, door locks keyed differently etc.  Spent about 30 minutes and
found a c-clip off the shift linkage and now I got 1,2,3,4,5,R!
Problem 1 fixed.  Next I tackled the wipers... yep, bad fuse.  This guy
had just used RainX instead but while I like RainX I also like working
wipers.  There is also a bunch of stupid cosmetic stuff that I'm fixing
along with things like the tach not working and a few others.

However, after driving it more now that I had all the gears I finally
got it warmed all the way up and found a rod knock (or some noise) that
appears on light throttle in neutral.  Using the stethescope it appears
loudest up by the distributer but it is not lifter noise or injector
noise (those are clearly distinct from this hollow rythmic thud).  I
wanted to see what shape the timing belt was in which is why I started
to pull the air filter box out and that is when I found the oil in the
bottom.  I had recently changed the oil with castrol 10W40 and a quart
of Rislone to help clean this engine out.  It appeared to be abused
over the years although it runs well, doesn't seem to smoke much and
the plugs all look pretty good.  I haven't done a compression check yet
but I think that is the next thing to do to see how good or bad this
engine really is.

Any other thoughts?

Thanks

--ken
> Your reasoning is correct but I think the oil may only be leaking after
> the engine gets hot.  Also, there is a time element involved.  What
> mass of oil do you find in the air cleaner for what time period?  Days,
> months?
> Does the engine use any oil?
> What kind of oil are you using?
William Noble - 29 Dec 2006 03:11 GMT
I wouldn't be too surprised to discover that your "knock" was a bad idler
pulley for either timing or balance shaft belt, or a loose belt (does this
have the spring loaded tensioner or the old style?)  I'd suspect valve seals
for the oil, and would probably ignore it.
these are just guesses, mind you

> Ok,  well, I think it is time for the story behind this car so the
> folks of this group who are way more knoweledgeable about 944s can
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>> Does the engine use any oil?
>> What kind of oil are you using?

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

gk - 29 Dec 2006 14:35 GMT
Old style tensioner.  I'm in the process of removing the timing belt
cover so I can watch what is happening when it starts to knock.  I'm
also planning on changing the belt while I have it apart.

> I wouldn't be too surprised to discover that your "knock" was a bad idler
> pulley for either timing or balance shaft belt, or a loose belt (does this
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> >> Does the engine use any oil?
> >> What kind of oil are you using?
BGMedia - 29 Dec 2006 15:32 GMT
Hi Ken, overall, it sounds like you got a pretty good deal on the car,
since the wipers and transmission have been easy (and cheap) to fix.
Let's say the car needs another $1000 bucks over the next year (timing
belts, engine mounts, misc stuff, etc.) -- I think you still did well.
My rule of thumb is that an early 944 is about a $3k to $4k car -- you
either spend that much on a good one, or you end up putting that much
money into a cheap one.

A good source of used parts is 944ecology, although George's prices are
a little high... but he has pretty much everything (I've been to his
house, and never seen so many 944 parts!)

Does your knocking noise sound like it's in the head or in the block?

Let us know what your compression values are, and perhaps do a leak
down test if you have the equipment (that will tell you the health of
the rings).

Those early engines are know for starving rod bearing #2 (on the crank)
if the oil level is too low.  Rebuilding the lower end of the engine
isn't impossible, but a little expensive, time consuming, and you have
to be careful.  If the body and interior are in good shape, I'd
recommend driving and enjoying the car, and if the knock gets worse,
perhaps looking for a used engine to put in...  But that's only if it
really an internal rod knock.  Hopefully it'll turn out to be something
like the idler bearing suggested above!

Perhaps I'll see you at Watkins Glen some time.

Good luck!

> Old style tensioner.  I'm in the process of removing the timing belt
> cover so I can watch what is happening when it starts to knock.  I'm
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
gk - 29 Dec 2006 16:17 GMT
Watkins Glen would be great.  Back when I lived in CA I was able to
drive at Riverside International and Willow Springs.  Since you are
local, this 944 is that champaign gold color.  I'm hoping someone can
give me a clue as to it's history.  Supposedly it came from a guy who
had 3 at one time and sold all three as a lot.  I'm sure If I find one
of the earlier owners I might get a better clue as to what else is
wrong with it.

I'll get the timing cover off over the weekend and then see what is
making the noise.  Thanks for the lead for more parts.
William Noble - 29 Dec 2006 17:03 GMT
if you haven't tensioned one of the old style tensioners before, here's the
procedure I use:
1. set it "about right" by feel - should be like any fan belt
2. run engine at idle and listen - if it whines, it's too tight, loosen a
bit and try again
3. bring RPM up to at least 3500 (slowly) and watch the belt - if it flaps
around, it's too loose, tighten it a bit

it is very helpful to make a thin wrench to fit on that oddly shaped nut on
the tensioner/idler - I don't remember the dimensions off the top of my
head.  Remember, too loose, and you will skip a tooth or two and destroy the
engine, too tight and you will destroy the bearings, the idler comes off and
you will destroy the engine - well not really "destroy the engine", just
break some valves and have the opportunity to rebuild the head and fix the
valve seals.

there are some DIY's on the internet discussing setting the tension without
the $500 tool - it sounds like you know what you are doing, so you should be
OK.

> Old style tensioner.  I'm in the process of removing the timing belt
> cover so I can watch what is happening when it starts to knock.  I'm
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>> > folks of this group who are way more knoweledgeable about 944s can
>> > chime in.  Here goes...
snip

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Walter Spector - 29 Dec 2006 17:47 GMT
> Old style tensioner.  I'm in the process of removing the timing belt
> cover so I can watch what is happening when it starts to knock.  I'm
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> > for the oil, and would probably ignore it.
> > these are just guesses, mind you

While William's idea on the knock is a good one, beware of doing the timing
belts yourself on a 944.  The 944 engine is an "interferance" engine - which
means that if it breaks/slips/etc, the valves and pistons collide and cause a
lot of internal engine damage.

The timing and balance belts must be replaced every 30k miles.  The pulleys,
rollers, and whatnot every 60k miles.  After replacement, the belts must be
retensioned about 2000 miles later.  Some also retension at 15k miles.  It is
normal for them to whine a little after (re)tensioning.  The whine goes away
as they stretch a bit.

The proper way to tension the belts is to use "The Tool" - which
is about a $500 part.  So it is best to seek out a mechanic who works on a
lot of 944s (and/or 928s) that has one.  (Ask him to show it to you, because
you've heard "it is kinda neat looking".)  Yes, there are some who may think
they can use a more inexpensive tool, or even possibly "by feel".  But realise
that such shortcuts can add a lot of risk to your engines longevity.

If you have no maint history on your car, consider having the timing belts
replaced Real Soon.

Walt - '86 944 NA
gk - 29 Dec 2006 19:01 GMT
I know all about the interference problem of the engine and I know that
if you tension it too tightly it destroys the water pump bearing.  I'm
surprised that they didn't come up with a real fix for that engine
along it's relatively long life.  I guess they just like to give the
shops some recurring income :-).   I'm going to order a belt/pully kit
to replace all of the belts and all of the pulleys.

> > Old style tensioner.  I'm in the process of removing the timing belt
> > cover so I can watch what is happening when it starts to knock.  I'm
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Walt - '86 944 NA
William Noble - 29 Dec 2006 19:44 GMT
I'll leave it to you to follow walt's advice or my approach - I have done
944s for a while, bought my 85.5 new, it's still going with 250K miles,
bought one for each daughter, and have resurrected others - I've never used
the tool, never had a problem due to incorrect tension - I did once fracture
a plastic tensioning roller on a late style tensioner (the first time I
worked on a car with one) and that caused a "spontaneous" valve job, shall
we say.  The water pump bearing is not the thing that goes if you over
tension, it is the tensioner bearing - I know this because the first time I
did the belts I did overtension it and that's what failed - fortunately, the
balance shaft turns at 2X the engine speed, so it is the balance shaft
tensioner that goes first (if you get uniform tension).  Yes, there is a
little whine on a properly tensioned belt, but not much.  If you really want
to, you can get a $10 gates belt tension tool (recommeded for my 993, by the
way - it's the same as the porsche part for checking belt tension on 993)
and use that - check a known properly tensioned belt and then set yours the
same - but honestly, if you have a good feel for belt tension, you'll have
no problem.   And, the cost of a valve job is less than most mechanics would
charge you for labor to change the belts......

your choice

>I know all about the interference problem of the engine and I know that
> if you tension it too tightly it destroys the water pump bearing.  I'm
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
>>
>> Walt - '86 944 NA

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

gk - 30 Dec 2006 03:34 GMT
Where do I get the gates belt tensioning tool?  I was thinking of
making one myself but if there is a decent one out there I will just
measure the current tension and then replicate it.

Here is a stupid question that I have yet to figure out.  Remember this
is a early one, not a 85.5 and up version... How do I get the 'defrost'
setting to work?  There are two levers on the upper side of the heater
control and one below.  The lower one goes directly to the heater valve
(and I need to replace the cable as it is bent) and each of the upper
ones seems to independently adjust the balance between the floor and
the dash registers.  Neither seems to get air out of the window defrost
vents at the windshield/dash junction.  What else is left?

--Ken

> I'll leave it to you to follow walt's advice or my approach - I have done
> 944s for a while, bought my 85.5 new, it's still going with 250K miles,
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
> >>
> >> Walt - '86 944 NA
William Noble - 31 Dec 2006 07:24 GMT
don't remember the setup on the older cars for defrost, but you can fix the
cable, no need to replace.

I bought the gates tool at my local auto parts store my receipt says "GAT
91107" on it, and I paid 9.95 for it - its a little silver tool that you
press against a belt until it clicks, then you read the tension off the
tool.  I haven't tried it on a 944, I've always just set the tension by
feel.  I've thought about manufacturing a copy of the $500 tool - using a
harbor freight dial indicator ($10) and a spring or two - if someone has
some dimensions on the "real" tool, that would be helpful, and I can think
about how to make it.

> Where do I get the gates belt tensioning tool?  I was thinking of
> making one myself but if there is a decent one out there I will just
[quoted text clipped - 101 lines]
>> >>
>> >> Walt - '86 944 NA

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

gk - 01 Jan 2007 01:17 GMT
I agree about making a replacement for the $500 tool.  These cars are
declining in value such that buying a $500 tool for tensioning the belt
seems rediculous.  And, I have to ask, what is so different with the
944 compared to any other timing belt motor that does not have a spring
loaded tensioner?  I know there were other interference engines that
had the same problem but I don't remember a special $500 tool involved.

Does anyone have a picture of the said porsche tool?  I should look at
the Harbor Fright website and see if they already have a tensioning
tool.  The seem to have just about everything else cheaper than you can
make it!

--k

> don't remember the setup on the older cars for defrost, but you can fix the
> cable, no need to replace.
[quoted text clipped - 116 lines]
> >> --
> >> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
William Noble - 01 Jan 2007 01:26 GMT
photo of tool is in the service manual, but there are no dimensions - you
need to machine some aluminum, add spring and pins and use a dial indicator
to read out tension - but I need the dimensions for the outer two pins -
what is the separation

>I agree about making a replacement for the $500 tool.  These cars are
> declining in value such that buying a $500 tool for tensioning the belt
[quoted text clipped - 158 lines]
>> >> --
>> >> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

gk - 01 Jan 2007 01:55 GMT
Actually, it isn't hard to calculate it.  Simple math works given a
spring tension and a dial indicator.  The only unknown is how far you
can deflect the belt without significantly changing the tension.

> photo of tool is in the service manual, but there are no dimensions - you
> need to machine some aluminum, add spring and pins and use a dial indicator
[quoted text clipped - 166 lines]
> >> --
> >> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
BGMedia - 01 Jan 2007 02:40 GMT
Have you thought about updating your car for the new, automatic
tensioner?  I'm not sure what would be involved... maybe taping or
thread inserting an extra hole or two... I don't know if there is
material on the block... so don't jump down my throat if there's not!
:)

Anyhow, I've borrowed that tensioning tool in the past and used it on
several automatic tensioners, and found that the automatic tensioner
was right on the money.  So I don't ever worry about using the tool, or
finding a substitute.

BTW, I frequent Watkins Glen, but I'm not that local -- I'm in
Poughkeepsie (half way between albany and NYC).

Also order a front main seal and change it while you do the belts.

Good luck!

> Actually, it isn't hard to calculate it.  Simple math works given a
> spring tension and a dial indicator.  The only unknown is how far you
[quoted text clipped - 173 lines]
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
William Noble - 02 Jan 2007 06:28 GMT
that was how I planned on calibrating the tool if I ever made one - but I
still would want to know the pin spacing.  And, even with the auto
tensioner, the tool would be helpful to tension the balance shaft belt

> Have you thought about updating your car for the new, automatic
> tensioner?  I'm not sure what would be involved... maybe taping or
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> was right on the money.  So I don't ever worry about using the tool, or
> finding a substitute.

big snip

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

gk - 03 Jan 2007 03:55 GMT
I'm going to try and find one of the gates tools and go from there for
tensioning the belt.

On the topic of the rod bearings, can I pull the pan without too much
work and without removing the engine?  How hard are the old pan gaskets
to get cleaned off?  I can only imagine what a job that might be if
those old gaskets are glued on.

> that was how I planned on calibrating the tool if I ever made one - but I
> still would want to know the pin spacing.  And, even with the auto
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> big snip
William Noble - 03 Jan 2007 05:25 GMT
I haven't had to do this, but it looks to me like you can drop the front
cross axle (or whatever you call that aluminum thing  under the engine) and
have enough room to work - don't sweat the gasket removal, that will be the
least of your problems, I'm sure.
> I'm going to try and find one of the gates tools and go from there for
> tensioning the belt.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> to get cleaned off?  I can only imagine what a job that might be if
> those old gaskets are glued on.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

BGMedia - 03 Jan 2007 22:46 GMT
You can change the rod bearings from down below, but it's probably not
the best method, I'll explain why in a minute.

If you want to take the oil pan off with the engine in the car, that
sub frame does need to come out.  Now, that sub frame is what hold the
engine IN, or more accurately the engine mounts bolt to the sub frame,
so you have to make sure the engine is supported from up above.  (a
piece of pipe, some chain and 2x4's can do the trick.)  You also have
to undo the control arms and will need an alignment when you're done.

The oil pan gasket is a thick rubber one that has little metal bosses
in it where the bolts go through -- see this picture:
http://catimages2.sophio.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/imc/images/full/944101205
02.jpg


There's no glue or anything holding it in place, so it should come
right off.

Now, about those rod bearings, this would be the time to change them,
and probably better to change them rather than leave them behind, but
in a perfect world, you want to do all of this in a very controlled
environment (read as: not on your back in your driveway with the car on
jack stands) where you can measure the old and new bearings to compare
thicknesses, measure the crank journals, inspect for damage and wear,
perhaps use plasti-gauge to measure the fit of the new ones, etc.  In
short, if you're really contemplating changing the rod bearings because
you want to freshen the car up and have it performing in peak condition
for many years to come, you'd be better off to take the engine
completely out and do a thorough job replacing all the seals, gaskets,
bearings, rings, etc.

If, however, you're changing the bearings because there is real damage,
like a spun bearing, then there is probably damage to the crank and the
crank bearings should also be replaced, which is far easier to do with
the engine out...

Now, if you're just patching up a broken car to sell, or some other
quickie fix, then by all means, do a half-assed job, but I don't think
that's what you're going for.

Good luck!

> I'm going to try and find one of the gates tools and go from there for
> tensioning the belt.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
alordofchaos@yahoo.com - 03 Jan 2007 15:59 GMT
> I agree about making a replacement for the $500 tool.

The fabled 9201 belt tensioning tool?

>  And, I have to ask, what is so different with the
> 944 compared to any other timing belt motor that does not have a spring
> loaded tensioner?  I know there were other interference engines that
> had the same problem but I don't remember a special $500 tool involved.

That would be the fabled "Porsche markup".

> Does anyone have a picture of the said porsche tool?

Try googling "Porsche 9201" or 9201 in google images.  If you don't
want to pay $500 or make your own tool, Bruce Arnn has made a
substitute:  http://www.arnnworx.com/

I've heard only good things about it, and it's on my list for the next
few months.
gk - 03 Jan 2007 19:35 GMT
Ok.. here is a stupid question that I'm sure has been answered
somewhere... What is the desired tension for the belts (new, used,
timing, balance) in some standard unit of measure (lbs, kg, etc).

I think i have a way to make a very simple gauge that will be very easy
to read and build.

Also, can one visually inspect a belt and determine the condition?
I've never had a belt fail in recent history (knock on wood now) but I
normally change them when they start to look worn.  Do these timing
belts just fail for no obvious reason or do they slowly wear out and
since they are hidden beneth the cover no one notices until they do
fail?

Thanks

--K

> > I agree about making a replacement for the $500 tool.
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> I've heard only good things about it, and it's on my list for the next
> few months.
William Noble - 03 Jan 2007 20:09 GMT
you cannot tell from outside when the internal cords are weakened - just
change them every 30K miles

> Ok.. here is a stupid question that I'm sure has been answered
> somewhere... What is the desired tension for the belts (new, used,
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>> I've heard only good things about it, and it's on my list for the next
>> few months.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

BGMedia - 03 Jan 2007 23:04 GMT
Age is also a factor, since rubber dries out.  I met a guy last year in
my region that has an S2 - '89 or something like that.  He bought it
new and drives it, literally, around the block a few times a year.  In
nearly 20 years, he only has 2,200 miles on it!  That's right two
thousand-two hundred.  He hasn't changed the oil yet... because it's
not at 3000 miles!  In fact, it's never had any maintenance -- every
piece of rubber, including the tires are original!

A time bomb waiting to happen in my book!

Anyhow, the point is: if you drive the car regularly, 30k miles is a
good time to change those belts, but, since most of these cars aren't
driven that much, maybe every 5 years is a better answer.

If you DO an inspection, and it you can see hairline cracks between the
teeth where the belt bends around backwards over the water pump --
change it.  Or, when in doubt (perhaps you're a new owner, perhaps you
don't trust the last mechanic) change it.

I met a woman recently who has a 944 for sale "cheap".  On October 13,
a Friday, of course, she was driving, and turning left at a stop light.
The belt snapped, and she coasted to a stop.  If you have to pay a
shop to fix that, it could exceed the value of the car.  Of course, if
you have a spare head sitting around, it's a bargain!  :)

> you cannot tell from outside when the internal cords are weakened - just
> change them every 30K miles

-snip-
Nate Nagel - 03 Jan 2007 23:44 GMT
> Age is also a factor, since rubber dries out.  I met a guy last year in
> my region that has an S2 - '89 or something like that.  He bought it
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> A time bomb waiting to happen in my book!

seriously.  If he really hasn't changed the oil, the engine is probably
scrap due to bearing corrosion.  Sad.

nate

Signature

replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

gk - 04 Jan 2007 03:28 GMT
I haven't seen an answer about the actual tension yet.  Is that
documented somewhere?  Or is it just calibrated in 'porsche tension
units'?

> > Age is also a factor, since rubber dries out.  I met a guy last year in
> > my region that has an S2 - '89 or something like that.  He bought it
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
> http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel
William Noble - 04 Jan 2007 06:39 GMT
do you have a copy of the factory service manual?  it tells you the exact
settings of the magic tool to use.  And, the GATES tool has settings as a
function of belt type/width in it's little manual

>I haven't seen an answer about the actual tension yet.  Is that
> documented somewhere?  Or is it just calibrated in 'porsche tension
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>> replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
>> http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

gk - 04 Jan 2007 15:42 GMT
Is there a 'magic tool' setting to real world setting conversion
somewhere?  As I said, it would be nice to have the tension in some
standard unit of measure as opposed to some arbitrary setting # on the
custom porsche tool.  Kinda reminds me of Spinal Tap and their
amplifier that went to 11 so it was louder!

> do you have a copy of the factory service manual?  it tells you the exact
> settings of the magic tool to use.  And, the GATES tool has settings as a
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> >> replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
> >> http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel
Magickal Childe - 07 Jan 2007 00:47 GMT
I think the tension is supposed to be ZERO when done correctly.

I have driven two 944's.
My 1983 944 had 550,000 miles on her when George B got her for scrap.  Only
because some kid ran into the rear and took out the rear axle shaft that I
had just finished putting in.
I never ever changed the belts at regular intervals.  I merely waited for
the water pumps to fail, or front engine bearings and pulleys to need
service, then changed the belts with that job - and I never had a belt
break - which may be a result of using the Porsche tension tool to tighten
the belts.

Also FYI,  I also never was very serious about changing the oil regularly -
I just followed the manual's recommendations and I think that's something
like 6 - 8000 miles.  Now that 944 had the original engine for the life of
the car!  I did have the main bearings replaced when I put in a new engine
pan gasket at around 300,000 miles...and the bearings were cheap.

These cars are way to babied by Porschies - i.e - never driving in the rain,
etc.  My car was driven EVERY day - including half its life in NYC and
driven in NYC top and go traffic.
I drove my baby in snowstorms, rain and hell.  It was a great car.

First clutch lasted 120,000 miles....second clutch lasted 430,000 miles and
it still had surface left.  Which proves if you can clutch well the clutch
should last the life of the car.

My 2nd 944 is '87 and automatic.  Purchased at 100,000 miles - she is an
automatic...god forbid...but a great automatic, and fun to go fast off the
light with.  Besides the damper being replaced when I first got her, she was
basically broken in at 150,000 - and now has 250,000 miles on her.  Serious
problems this board should know are that the BRAIN computer and the cruise
control gets cold solder joints...really.  The brain surprisingly, was MUCH
easier to solder (the large connections are the ones!) and fix...(Rap the
box in an emergency) than the
cruise control.  That computer brain caused a lot of problems, causing a tow
to my friendly Porsche mechanic (Advanced Auto, New Windsor, NY - the best!)

Was it a spark cable? A coil?  Spark plugs?  What I could not figure it
out --- until I put in a test computer on a trip in Fla about 1500 miles
from home.  So be sure to always remember that ^&*#!#$ computer.

Signature

joliett
--------

> Is there a 'magic tool' setting to real world setting conversion
> somewhere?  As I said, it would be nice to have the tension in some
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>> >> replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
>> >> http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel
William Noble - 07 Jan 2007 05:16 GMT
Very dangerous misinformation in this post,  PLEASE SEE AREAS MARKED IN ALL
CAPS

>I think the tension is supposed to be ZERO when done correctly. <<<
>ABSOLUTELY WRONG, CAN LEAD TO ENGINE DESTRUCTION VERY QUICKLY
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> out --- until I put in a test computer on a trip in Fla about 1500 miles
> from home.  So be sure to always remember that ^&*#!#$ computer.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

GigaNews - 08 Jan 2007 05:15 GMT
RE: William Noble's response

This is PRECISELY why I posted that information - because there are certain
drivers out there that MAKE UP THEIR OWN RULES and think they know
everything.  Changing the engine oil at 3000 miles on a normally driven
Porsche is a waste of our natural resources, our landfills, and a  waste of
money.  I didn't make this rule - Porsche engineers made this rule.  The
designers of the great Porsche engines made this rule.  Check out you
owner's manual and follow its recommendations.

Besides I have had great success with over 550,000 miles on my last 944
following the manuals recommendations.  And that doesn't include cooling
system problems when the car was relatively new.  So who's recommendation do
you follow?  Me?  Your dad (3000 miles - what a waste)?  OR do you follow
the manufacturer's owners manual.  Seems like a simple and easy choice.
BTW, OBVIOUSLY we're not talking raced Porsche's here.

Here is what the manual says - and I quote:
Change oil and filter every 15000 miles for normally aspirated 944 cars -
and at least ONCE A YEAR.

Regarding the clutch center - I HAD the RUBBER CENTER - and that's BS that
the rubber disintegrates in 10 years.  I had that rubber center clutch for
20 years and the rubber center was not worn.  What will break the rubber
center could be an actual car accident or maybe from "popping" the clutch.
AND WHEN THE RUBBER CENTER FAILS it does NOT destroy the engine.  (What BS.)
It failed on my manual AND automatic transmission 944's.  Porsche designed
the clutch to slip to a mechanical steel stop designed in the clutch center
around the rubber center.  You can actually drive the car - for the
remaining life of the car and not have ANY mechanical problems other than
noise and vibration.  As a matter of fact - on the manual 944 you may not
even know it failed...until you replace the clutch - I didn't.

So there - it's experience that counts, it's following the owner's manual -
it's 550,000 miles on a daily driven Porsche that wasn't babied for a
minute.  3000 mile oil changes are things of the past - unless you own an
oil change shop.

Signature

joliett
--------

> Very dangerous misinformation in this post,  PLEASE SEE AREAS MARKED IN
> ALL CAPS
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
>> out --- until I put in a test computer on a trip in Fla about 1500 miles
>> from home.  So be sure to always remember that ^&*#!#$ computer.
William Noble - 08 Jan 2007 07:58 GMT
you know, I wasn't going to bother following up on this, but, it is
interesting that you cannot quote my posts correctly

1. oil change - I said I didn't have the manual handy - if you are
truthfully quoting the manual, then go for it.  In general following
manual's recomendations won't get you in trouble.  However, infrequently
driven cars require more frequent oil change for several reasons which I am
not going to elaborate on - anyone who cares can do their own research.
And, recylcling oil does not wast landfills - I don't know what YOU do with
old oil, I do know what I do.

2. I didn't bother taking photos, but based on my sample of cars, failure of
the rubber centered clutch DOES NOT go as you suggest - in one case, the
increased impact load from metal on metal contact led, I believe (no, this
is not a verified hypothesis) to failure of the pinion gear in my trans,
which was pretty fatal to the transmission.  In another case, the welded on
tabs didn't hold the rotation, and the car just would not go.  Maybe YOU can
drive the car for the remaining life of the car, many other people cannot do
so.

3. if you choose to re-read the post that has so righteously annoyed you,
you will find NO reference to destroying the engine, you will find a
reference to destroying the transmission.  feel free to rant and rave all
you want, I stand by my recommendations - I think I probably have more 944s
than you have, and probably have had them longer, but frankly I don't care
to argue with you and degrade this rather pleasant NG.  Those who wish to do
so can follow my suggestions, or they can follow yours.

> RE: William Noble's response
>
[quoted text clipped - 88 lines]
>>> out --- until I put in a test computer on a trip in Fla about 1500 miles
>>> from home.  So be sure to always remember that ^&*#!#$ computer.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Magickal Childe - 16 Jan 2007 02:51 GMT
1. Recycle oil - you are partially correct about not hurting landfills from
the oil, but the CONTAINERS do hurt landfills, and especially since many
"empty" oil containers contain some oil in there too.
2. I drove my first manual 83-944 for maybe 40,000 miles after the rubber
disk was broken in an accident until the clutch surface wore out.  I drove
my 1987-944 automatic for about 200 miles after the rubber disk
disintegrated.

This is pretty nice NG and I read it regularly - and maybe you do have more
944's than I do, but do you drive them?  When I need NG advise I really do
appreciate your advise.
Signature


joliett
--------

> you know, I wasn't going to bother following up on this, but, it is
> interesting that you cannot quote my posts correctly
[quoted text clipped - 117 lines]
>>>> out --- until I put in a test computer on a trip in Fla about 1500
>>>> miles from home.  So be sure to always remember that ^&*#!#$ computer.
William Noble - 16 Jan 2007 03:59 GMT
well, I guess I rarely drive a 944 any more - I gave the one I bought new to
my brother (he drives it every day) and I bought one for each daughter (they
drive theirs every day), but my current transportation car is air cooled.
So, no, I don't drive them.  That said, I still stand my my caution about
the clutch.

snip

> This is pretty nice NG and I read it regularly - and maybe you do have
> more 944's than I do, but do you drive them?  When I need NG advise I
> really do appreciate your advise.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

gk - 16 Jan 2007 15:55 GMT
William,

I think some of the advice given by a previous poster was indeed a bit
suspect.  Normal oil changes are 3K miles and while oil has gotten
better, what contanimates it has not.  As cars age (as is my 944)
blowby becomes significant and changing the oil every 10K is not the
best thing.  And yes, recycling oil is good. Most of us do not pour it
on our driveways like we did 40 years ago.  I think someone above needs
to buy a solar powered car and leave the rest of us alone.

Btw, I'm currently in the process of pulling the pan to check out the
rod bearings.  If they are too shot then I'm going to pull the whole
engine and rebuild it from scratch.

--Ken

> well, I guess I rarely drive a 944 any more - I gave the one I bought new to
> my brother (he drives it every day) and I bought one for each daughter (they
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> > joliett
> > --------
GigaNews - 17 Jan 2007 09:48 GMT
gk,

point is - where do you get that magick 3000 miles number from anyway?  you
sure it's not from your father's car's specs, or from the local oil change
shop - because years ago, (maybe 40?) that may have been spec.  but now it's
12,000 miles before oil changes.  why?  because that's what the Porsche
engineers specify.  simple.
if you tow or race - than it's certainly more frequent.  But I did NYC
frequent stop and go driving - and long interstate drives ----- Porsche
rules.

oh yea - how do i know?  because I put in the cheapest Wal-Mart 10x40 oil
and the cheapest and lowest grade gas I can find - and lo and behold - my
last 1983 944 lasted to 550,000 and was going to another 100,000.  really.
My new one a 1987 - 944 has 250,000 and it drives like a dream...

These cars are built like little trucks - and what great cars they are.

And William - you a certainly are a 944 family - my kind of family.  What
car do you drive now?

joliett

> William,
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>> > joliett
>> > --------
William Noble - 18 Jan 2007 05:29 GMT
if you browse around my web site, www.wbnoble.com, you may be able to infer
what I'm driving now, I'll leave that as a homework assignment since it is
irrelevant to the group.

I will point out though that some cars (like the one I drive now) with a
recommended 15K mile oil change interval require synthetic oil and also use
a lot of it (12 qts), whereas the 944 doesn't and uses only 6 qts.  Further,
combustion products work their way past the rings into the oil.  If you are
driving 100 miles each way to work, each day, I'd say you are good to go for
10k miles on your 944, but if you drive 1 mile each way you are well advised
to change closer to the 3K point.  Proof, of a sorts - if you have a high
mileage car that you drive only short distances, it may seem to use no oil -
then you take it out on a long (8 hour high speed) drive and suddenly you
are down 3 quarts - what happened?  No, the car didn't suddenly start
burning oil, what happened is that the voliatile combustion products that
had disolved in the oil evaporated and left because the oil got hot enough
and stayed hot enough long enough.  Frankly, If I have to put in $6 worth of
oil after 3 to 5 K miles, and change the $15 filter every other oil change,
no problem, it's cheap insurance and known to work.  On the other hand, if I
have to put in $60 of mobile 1, two filters at $20 each, and take the car
half way apart to do it, then I'm really glad to do it only 1/5 as often.

> gk,
>
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>>> > joliett
>>> > --------

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Fred Aston - 27 Jan 2007 21:37 GMT
Had the same problem with my '89.  Actually the identicle same symptoms.  It
turned out to be my flex disc.  It is the rubber dampener between the engine
and half shaft.  Bad news if it is indeed a bad disc.  $1250.00 by a
non-dealership Porsche Specialist.  Car was beautiful after the repair
though.  Best of luck.

Fred

> Ok,  well, I think it is time for the story behind this car so the
> folks of this group who are way more knoweledgeable about 944s can
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>> Does the engine use any oil?
>> What kind of oil are you using?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.