Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Porsche / Porshe 944 / January 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Yo, Devils!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Doug - 22 Nov 2003 12:25 GMT
I've been waiting for the author of this post (from July) to resurface
and he has done so. For those of you who took this post as gospel,
read on:

>I got a list of what it will cost to modify your 944 with a Chevy V-8.

>1. ENGINE : Several manufacturers offer "drop-in" V-8's for engine swaps. To
>get the engine with aluminum heads to save weight, the Chevy 350 is offered
>in 2 HP's The 310HP version and the 350HP version. For those of you
>unfamiliar with the term "drop-in" that just means complete.
>Your cost (parts only) the 310HP version : $3600.00
>                                  the 350HP version : $4600.00

That'll be the 275 hp and the 300 hp. I bought a 63k '93 Corvette LT1
(aluminum heads) for 1500.00.

>Labor : You will have to modify the engine bay, the front suspension and the
>engine mounting in order to get this engine to seat properly. It will weigh
>92lbs. more and is seated further up than the stock 944 motor.

There are no modifications necessary to the engine bay, the engine
weighs 60 lbs. more than the original and the only suspension
modification is to replace the front springs with heavier ones.

>The myth is
>that the 944 is 50/50 balanced. In truth it is 48 rear 52 front. Factoring
>in the heavier motor and beefed up suspension required you will get about a
>4% to 5% increase up front. This will change your weight ratio to about 45.5
>rear 54.5 up front. This WILL affect your handling, no doubt. It's the total
>weight distribution NOT the heavier springs that determine the 944's
>handling.

Not everybody is into handling. If my car will go around a
cloverleaf-type on ramp @ 40mph I'll be happy.

>Gauges will need to be switched as well as computers and harnesses.

More misinformation regarding the gauges. The original gauges work
fine when used with custom senders.

>Now, the suspension parts will cost you in the neighborhood of $1200.00.

One set of 250 lb. springs and spacers = 160.00.

>If you wish to have your air conditioning, power steering or other
>miscellaneous features expect an additional $2500 charge.

For what? Both of mine are connected and all it involved was making
custom lines.

>It is simply not cost effective, fuel efficient, or car value efficient to
>make the swap. I urge you Brad...check with a mechanic, they will tell you.

I am a good way through the V-8 swap, and I'm beyond the point of
getting any financial surprises on this deal. I have this V-8 in an
outstanding '86 951 body and I can guarantee you I won't have 12k in
this car finished. I will say that I do my own work and that saves me
a fortune.
As far as 'car value efficient' I can't agree with that either. These
cars are not really collectibles. At any given time there are between
40 and 60 of them on Ebay and the average sales price is 4-5k,
discounting the truly nice ones that bring much more, and deservedly
so.
Fuel efficient? Who cares. It's a weekend car.
There are those of us who like the looks of the 944 and appreciate
its' solid construction. There are also those of us who don't like
Turbos or the fact that one has to spend thousands to get decent
horsepower numbers from an engine that has to be pushed to the limits
of reliability. For us, there's the V-8 conversion. I like the Chevy
V8. I was raised with them and I doubt I'll ever have to go to a
newsgroup or a bulletin board to find out how to fix it should it
break, which I notice, is the reason most posters are here.
Of 125 voters on a current Rennlist poll, 27% said they thought a V8
swap is a reasonable idea and another 31% are sitting on the fence.

Doug
Alan Cole - 22 Nov 2003 20:27 GMT
> Not everybody is into handling. If my car will go around a
> cloverleaf-type on ramp @ 40mph I'll be happy.

I think this statement succinctly sums up the difference between the 'V8
camp' and the 'originality camp'. Porsches (especially the front engined
ones) are all about sweet handling, that's what they do best. Personally, I
love the fact that I can chuck my 944 around twisty, wet country roads and
know exactly how it will respond. I don't need massive torque to enjoy this
simple pleasure. Lotus cars are similar in this respect - less is more.

If you only want straight line grunt to go drag racing, why not just buy a
muscle car?
Doug - 22 Nov 2003 23:17 GMT
>> Not everybody is into handling. If my car will go around a
>> cloverleaf-type on ramp @ 40mph I'll be happy.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>know exactly how it will respond. I don't need massive torque to enjoy this
>simple pleasure. Lotus cars are similar in this respect - less is more.

I admire your ability to air a differing viewpoint without a chip on
your shoulder, AND without expletives like the boob that posted below.
This issue is hardly worth getting emotional over. These cars are
neither collector's items, museum pieces or shrines. They are cars and
that's about it.

>If you only want straight line grunt to go drag racing, why not just buy a
>muscle car?

A stated previously in the response to Devil's error-prone posting, I
like the looks and solidity of the car and I like Chevy V8's. That's
about it.

Before I bail, as long as I have a 944 I consider myself welcome here
whether anybody who holds the 944 as a religious entity likes it or
not.

Doug
Devils944S2 - 23 Nov 2003 00:36 GMT
<Devil's error-prone posting>

You see Doug, this is why I don't bother anymore. It is a waste of my time
and yours. If you had bothered to read my posts you would have seen that I
was much more factual than you.
We have gone over this a million times both here and in Rennlist and based
on what everybody who has done it, and has actually looked into it (as I
have) the concensus is that a PROPER job, done by a professional (read that
again, because most of us do not have the time or skills to do a PROPER job
by ourselves) To get all of the required new parts, have all of the systems
hooked back up, it will cost in excess of $10K. $12K being the closest to
the finalized number.
You want to throw out numbers to reduce the total by buying the motor
yourself...great...a Chevy motor with 63K is about 37K from it's typical
lifespan before some engine work is necessary. A PROPER job would include
buying a NEW motor. So great, you got an used motor with about 2-3 years of
efficient life lift in her. How does this save me money in the long run?
Besides, the Corvette motors from that generation have a bevy of water pump
and distribution concerns, I hope you have addressed that.
Next...and for the last time...60lbs, is the engine weight difference...that
is a known fact. What you also want to throw out is the fact that weight is
only a small factor in the 944 handling picture. That engine that weighs
only 60lbs more also carries the weight differently. The engine being longer
carries the extra 60lbs and the extra length in FRONT of the front wheels.
You can try to fool everyone if you want, but on a PROPER job, you will have
a NOTICABLE change in handling. The roads where I live have curves.
As for you other details...Springs, retrofitting, and adapters. Great, you
do it yourself and save money. What about the rest of us who don't have time
or skill to do it?

You see Doug, my main question is, and remains to be, why replace a higher
QUALITY product with a cheaper product that has half the lifespan and half
of the reliability?
It makes no sense. Cheap is cheap. Quality costs money.

A 951S still makes more sense than a Chevy swap.

It's your car Doug, do what you want with it, but don't you come in here and
try to tell people that they are being lied to about costs. A PROPER job,
done by a QUALIFIED mechanic, done with NEW parts and having ALL systems
reconnected WILL cost you over $10K and closer to $12K. Not exactly a drop
in the bucket for most people.

Don't bother to respond, I am done with this subject. Enjoy your car.

> >> Not everybody is into handling. If my car will go around a
> >> cloverleaf-type on ramp @ 40mph I'll be happy.
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Doug
LS1944 - 29 Jan 2004 03:54 GMT
FIRSTLY, DEVILS 944S2 SHOULD PRACTICE ON GRAMMAR AND SPELL CHECKING HIS WORK. NOW FOR THE MEAT OF THIS WRITING. IF YOU ARE NOT MECHANICALLY INCLINED AND HAVE TO HAVE YOUR CAR SERVICED AT A PROFESSIONAL MECHANIC SHOP, YOU SHOULDN'T OWN A PORSCHE. THEY ARE KNOWN FOR SPENDING MORE TIME IN THE SHOP THAN ON THE ROAD. NEXT, IF MONEY IS A PROBLEM, YOU SHOULDN'T OWN A PORSCHE OR THINK ABOUT MODIFYING IT. AND FINALLY A $4000.00 CRATE ENGINE IS STILL ALOT CHEAPER THAN BUILDING A PORSCHE ENGINE TO CREATE EQUAL POWER OR RELIABILITY. IF YOU OR SOMEONE YOU KNOW CAN ONLY GET 100K MILES FROM A CHEVY V 8, YOU SHOULD CONSIDER TAKING IT TO A PROFESSIONAL TO HAVE IT SERVICED, BEDCAUSE EVIDENTLY YOU ARE NOT DOING A VERY GOOD JOB. CHEVY V 8'S GET ALOT MORE THAN 100K MILES ON THE CLOCK WITH LESS MAINTENANCE, AND LOWER REPAIR BILLS THAN A PORSCHE. I OWN A 951 WITH A LS1 AND WOULDN'T HAVE IT ANY OTHER WAY. I HAVE LESS THAN 12K INVESTED IN THE COMPLETE BUILDUP, INCLUDING A COMPLETE HIGH QUALITY REFINISHING JOB. A CLOSE FRIEND OF MINE HAS BEEN MODIFYING AND WORKING ON HIS 951 FOR OVER TWO YEARS, AND HASN'T PUT 300 MILES ON IT IN THIS TIME FRAME. HE UPGRADED TO A BIGGER TURBO, INTERCOOLER, PIPING AND COMPUTER UPGRADES, LIGHTENED FLYWHEEL AND PERFORMANCE CLUTCH FOR AROUND $3000, DOING ALL THE LABOR HIMSELF, AND IS STILL GETTING SPANKED BY LT1 AND LS1 CAMAROS WITH ONLY PERFORMANCE EXHAUST SYSTEMS. IF YOU GERMAN DIE-HARDS  BELIEVE SO MUCH IN THE PORSCHE PRODUCT, WHY DO YOU PRAISE IT AND THEN ATTEMPT TO MODIFY IT.
Devils944S2 - 29 Jan 2004 06:29 GMT
<FIRSTLY,>

Yes, firstly, stop yelling. Learn some manners before you fire up the old
PII and attempt to make a point.

<IF YOU ARE NOT MECHANICALLY INCLINED AND HAVE TO HAVE YOUR CAR SERVICED AT
A PROFESSIONAL MECHANIC SHOP, YOU SHOULDN'T OWN A PORSCHE.>

Why not? I can turn a wrench, but I can also afford to have a professional
do it for me.

<THEY ARE KNOWN FOR SPENDING MORE TIME IN THE SHOP THAN ON THE ROAD.>

Show me some proof. My friends 1995 C-4 Vette has spent more time in the
shop than my 1990 Porsche AND has cost MUCH more. So take your SUBJECTIVE
bullshit elsewhere.

<NEXT, IF MONEY IS A PROBLEM, YOU SHOULDN'T OWN A PORSCHE OR THINK ABOUT
MODIFYING IT.>

If money is a problem, you should get a better job or better your education.

<AND>
Hey, Grammar king...you don't begin a sentence with "and"

<FINALLY A $4000.00 CRATE ENGINE IS STILL ALOT CHEAPER THAN BUILDING A
PORSCHE ENGINE>

Hey your are right. Cheaper is cheaper for a reason. You can twist it any
way you want, but in no circumstance is cheaper EVER better. To go cheaper,
you are giving up something, usually quality.

<IF YOU OR SOMEONE YOU KNOW CAN ONLY GET 100K MILES FROM A CHEVY V 8, YOU
SHOULD CONSIDER TAKING IT TO A PROFESSIONAL TO HAVE IT SERVICED>

Wait genius, didn't you say above that only if you own a Porsche and weren't
mechanically inclined would you need a professional? Now you say that for a
Chevy? Sorry, I'll pass. In the J.D. Power LONG TERM reliability and quality
survey, Porsche beat out EVERY other brand. Chevy wasn't even close.

<BEDCAUSE>
What happened there Hemmingway, spell check broken?

<EVIDENTLY YOU ARE NOT DOING A VERY GOOD JOB. CHEVY V 8'S GET ALOT MORE
THAN 100K MILES ON THE CLOCK WITH LESS MAINTENANCE, AND LOWER REPAIR BILLS
THAN A PORSCHE.>

Yeah, why don't you tell that to my friend with his C-4.

<I OWN A 951 WITH A LS1>
No you don't. You own a bastard. The 951 designation is for a turbocharged
engine. Is that ancient pushrod design a turbo? I didn't think so. You might
as well tell everyone you have an S2, it's the same body.

<AND WOULDN'T HAVE IT ANY OTHER WAY. I HAVE LESS THAN 12K INVESTED IN THE
COMPLETE BUILDUP, INCLUDING A COMPLETE HIGH QUALITY REFINISHING JOB.>

Less than $12K. Wow! You have dropped the cars value through the floor and
have "invested", what, $11K? You are one savvy man!

<A CLOSE FRIEND OF MINE HAS BEEN MODIFYING AND WORKING ON HIS 951 FOR OVER
TWO YEARS, AND HASN'T PUT 300 MILES ON IT IN THIS TIME FRAME. HE UPGRADED TO
A BIGGER TURBO, INTERCOOLER, PIPING AND COMPUTER UPGRADES, LIGHTENED
FLYWHEEL AND PERFORMANCE CLUTCH FOR AROUND $3000, DOING ALL THE LABOR
HIMSELF, AND IS STILL GETTING SPANKED BY LT1 AND LS1 CAMAROS WITH ONLY
PERFORMANCE EXHAUST SYSTEMS.>

Proof?

<IF YOU GERMAN DIE-HARDS  BELIEVE SO MUCH IN THE PORSCHE PRODUCT, WHY DO YOU
PRAISE IT AND THEN ATTEMPT TO MODIFY IT.>

If you Chevy die-hards believe so much in Chevy, then why do you praise it,
blather on about Camaro's and in the end want a Porsche. If Chevy is so
great, buy one.

Lastly...all this posing and yakking endlessly about races and getting
whooped by LS1's. History tells a much different story. The "mighty" V-8's
by Chevy were beaten week in and week out by Porsche in head to head racing,
funny part, it wasn't the 911 handing out the beatings, it was the N/A 944.
(IMSA Firehawk series, 1985, GM dropped out the following year because
Camaro, Firebird and Corvette lost EVERY race to the much more balanced 944)

So listen Chevy guy, you better come in here with more than the weak
bullshit you typed, but, then again, an AOL member. That pretty much says it
all...

> FIRSTLY, DEVILS 944S2 SHOULD PRACTICE ON GRAMMAR AND SPELL CHECKING HIS WORK. NOW FOR THE MEAT OF THIS WRITING. IF YOU ARE NOT MECHANICALLY INCLINED
AND HAVE TO HAVE YOUR CAR SERVICED AT A PROFESSIONAL MECHANIC SHOP, YOU
SHOULDN'T OWN A PORSCHE. THEY ARE KNOWN FOR SPENDING MORE TIME IN THE SHOP
THAN ON THE ROAD. NEXT, IF MONEY IS A PROBLEM, YOU SHOULDN'T OWN A PORSCHE
OR THINK ABOUT MODIFYING IT. AND FINALLY A $4000.00 CRATE ENGINE IS STILL
ALOT CHEAPER THAN BUILDING A PORSCHE ENGINE TO CREATE EQUAL POWER OR
RELIABILITY. IF YOU OR SOMEONE YOU KNOW CAN ONLY GET 100K MILES FROM A CHEVY
V 8, YOU SHOULD CONSIDER TAKING IT TO A PROFESSIONAL TO HAVE IT SERVICED,
BEDCAUSE EVIDENTLY YOU ARE NOT DOING A VERY GOOD JOB. CHEVY V 8'S GET ALOT
MORE THAN 100K MILES ON THE CLOCK WITH LESS MAINTENANCE, AND LOWER REPAIR
BILLS THAN A PORSCHE. I OWN A 951 WITH A LS1 AND WOULDN'T HAVE IT ANY OTHER
WAY. I HAVE LESS THAN 12K INVESTED IN THE COMPLETE BUILDUP, INCLUDING A
COMPLETE HIGH QUALITY REFINISHING JOB. A CLOSE FRIEND OF MINE HAS BEEN
MODIFYING AND WORKING ON HIS 951 FOR OVER TWO YEARS, AND HASN'T PUT 300
MILES ON IT IN THIS TIME FRAME. HE UPGRADED TO A BIGGER TURBO, INTERCOOLER,
PIPING AND COMPUTER UPGRADES, LIGHTENED FLYWHEEL AND PERFORMANCE CLUTCH FOR
AROUND $3000, DOING ALL THE LABOR HIMSELF, AND IS STILL GETTING SPANKED BY
LT1 AND LS1 CAMAROS WITH ONLY PERFORMANCE EXHAUST SYSTEMS. IF YOU GERMAN
DIE-HARDS  BELIEVE SO MUCH IN THE PORSCHE PRODUCT, WHY DO YOU PRAISE IT AND
THEN ATTEMPT TO MODIFY IT.
D Corley - 30 Jan 2004 16:12 GMT
f.y.i

I have owned 2 944's in the last 5 years.... one for 4  and the latest
(a 951) for a year....  both are daily drivers to the tune of 80 miles a
day during the week back and forth to work and about that on theweekend
just running around....

the 944 had an altercation with a Mercedes MLK, bent the nose, ended up
being totaled (you should have seen the MB , it came out far worse on
the deal)

Time in the shop for the 944 , over the 4 years , 2 weeks total, and
that was for belts, and oil changes...  for the 951, for the last 12
months , 1 week ( belts, rollers, gaskets, seals,  and motor mounts...)  
and in my garage for one day to replace the alternator.

now, my spouses' S-10 Blazer has been in and out of the shop to fix
various dealer only items like window lift mechanisims along with
various electrical gremlins on average of 1 week every other month (and
I have to make and appoitment 2 weeks in advance, where my 944 mech fits
me in on the next day) and she drives it maybe 50 miles a week, most of
the time it sits in my driveway....

money, collectively I have spent more on the Blazer then I have on BOTH
944's  

your call,  which is the better deal ???????

DC '87 951...

><FIRSTLY,>
>
[quoted text clipped - 111 lines]
>
>  
Doug - 30 Jan 2004 23:29 GMT
>now, my spouses' S-10 Blazer has been in and out of the shop to fix
>various dealer only items like window lift mechanisims along with
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>your call,  which is the better deal ???????

I do believe you're missing the point. It's not a question of 'what's
a better deal'. It's not about money (at least in my case). It's about
what makes me happy. Personally, I don't give a rat's rear end about
how many times the Chevy has been in the shop versus the Porsche, nor
do I care about whether or not a pushrod V8 is yesterday's news. I
don't care if your car is faster than mine, nor do I care how well
either car sashays through the cones. In addition, I don't care if
I've increased or decreased the value of the car. To me, this
particular car is just a really nice platform to hold a V8. You should
be honored that I picked a 951; the last one was a MB 280SL (which,
incidentally, I sold at a reasonable profit).
I must say I enjoy eliciting such emotional replies from you fanatics,
while keeping my responses on the monotone side. (As if this whole
debate is worth getting hot over...right.)
...out to the garage to do some hackin' an' slashin'-

Doug
P.S. Renegade says an LS1 won't fit a 944 bodied car.

>DC '87 951...
>
[quoted text clipped - 84 lines]
>>bullshit you typed, but, then again, an AOL member. That pretty much says it
>>all...

>>  
D Corley - 31 Jan 2004 00:24 GMT
I believe my point was your comment about Porsches being "shop queens"

while I have no doubt there are those, particularly the 911 family, that
have that reputation, it does NOT hold true for the 944/951/968 group.....

personally , if you want to stuff a V8 into a 951,, or even into a 911,  
have at it.... though I can think of a couple of other platforms that
would be better candidates but that is a matter of personal taste   My
choice would be a 914/6 , with a stout V8 in it and some minor
suspension upgradeds , it will whip darn near anything on the street or
track

DC

-----------------

>>now, my spouses' S-10 Blazer has been in and out of the shop to fix
>>various dealer only items like window lift mechanisims along with
[quoted text clipped - 127 lines]
>
>  
Seber - 22 Nov 2003 20:46 GMT
Hey Doug, maybe if this was alt.autos.porsche.bastardization we'd give a
sh.t.

How irritating, no matter what you do or where you go the trolls stick to
you like glue. Please, if you want to talk about V8 "drop-ins" go create
another news group and do it there, we have done this to death and no longer
wish to discuss it.  So in short,  incase you can't take a hint, no one
cares because we don't want a V8, and worse yet, one made by Chevy, in our
cars.

If you want V8 power, please spare a 944 to someone who appreciates the car
for what it is and go buy a Camaro.

> I've been waiting for the author of this post (from July) to resurface
> and he has done so. For those of you who took this post as gospel,
[quoted text clipped - 72 lines]
>
> Doug
Doug - 22 Nov 2003 21:53 GMT
>If you want V8 power, please spare a 944 to someone who appreciates the car
>for what it is and go buy a Camaro.

If I had to appreciate it for what it "is" I wouldn't own it. Have a
nice day!

Doug
Mark - 26 Nov 2003 18:57 GMT
> >If you want V8 power, please spare a 944 to someone who appreciates the car
> >for what it is and go buy a Camaro.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Doug

THEN ITS OBVIOUS YOU SHOULD HAVE BOUGHT SOMETHING ELSE
Doug - 26 Nov 2003 22:15 GMT
>> >If you want V8 power, please spare a 944 to someone who appreciates the car
>> >for what it is and go buy a Camaro.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>THEN ITS OBVIOUS YOU SHOULD HAVE BOUGHT SOMETHING ELSE

...not now, please.....torch and sawzall are both running......

Doug
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.