> No question: Porsche should anti-up for both the CD and the transmission
> repair/replacement. I also purchased a '01, 996 Cab, with 25k mi and a
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Go Get 'Em!
Thanks for your comments. The status as of an hour ago is that they plan to
open the transmission on Monday and, in the words of the service manager,
"will most likely just go ahead and fix it".
It took me a while, but I finally figured out what the warranty work problem
is. The individual dealership is responsible for assigning "CPO" status to
a pre-owned vehicle, in accordance with guidelines for mileage, age, etc. by
Porsche. The vehicles are supposed to be mechanically checked out by the
dealership before being designated as a "CPO" under the warranty program.
Porsche is putting the onus on the dealership to absorb the cost to fix
because they didn't notice the issue with the transmission before assigning
COP status. The dealership, meanwhile, has been trying to get Porsche to
cover the cost. This has been going on for almost two weeks.
I can somewhat understand the dealership's concern. In the past Porsche did
not authorize field repair of transmissions. They simply replaced the whole
thing with a new one at considerable cost. More recently, field
replacement of internal components have been authorized, but only after an
inspection and validation that the component did not fail due to abuse.
My dealer is a small dealership and I suspect they were concerned about the
possibility of having to absorb a $10k new transmission.
Anyway, we'll see what happens next week. I explained that I understand
they are caught between a rock and a hard place and this situation is
somewhat unusual. As a compromise, and in good faith, I offered to pay one
third of the verified repair cost up to a maximum dollar value in the event
a new transmission is required (which is very unlikely). I suggested that
then they and Porsche can fight about who covers the other two thirds. The
service manager didn't think my offer of partial payment would be necessary.
I just want my car fixed and returned, because spring is around the corner
and I want to drive it!
RCE
Guru - 08 Mar 2008 19:41 GMT
Your offer is more than fair...further than I would have gone; however, I
understand wanting to get the car back on the road.
Seems to me that the problem is as you noted...between PCNA and your dealer.
On the other hand, some of these issues only "pop up" or are going to be
missed in a CPO inspection. If the car always jumps out of 2nd...then the
dealer is at fault; however, if it's intermittent, then I can see how it was
missed.
I agree with you...that the dealer will simply fix it if it's only few
parts.
Spring is already here in Houston (although we're still getting some 35-40
degree mornings).
Six Porsches, 1 Ferrari 430 and a Ford GT met early this AM and we did a
little environmentally unfriendly country driving, probably scaring the
spots off a few cows and whetting the appetite of several "county mounties";
however, thanks to several excellent radar detectors and 2 way radios, it
was just a blast, with nothing but a little shoulder gravel disturbed as we
flew by. Those Ford GT's have got some kind of straight line
acceleration...but they need mud flaps to keep from throwing stones high up
in the air.
Hope everything works out!
>> No question: Porsche should anti-up for both the CD and the transmission
>> repair/replacement. I also purchased a '01, 996 Cab, with 25k mi and a
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
>
> RCE
Eisboch - 15 Mar 2008 06:07 GMT
> Anyway, we'll see what happens next week. I explained that I understand
> they are caught between a rock and a hard place and this situation is
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> RCE
Just an update for any who may be curious or interested. Today I talked to
the service manager regarding progress on my 996TT.
They opened up the transmission and inspected the faulty syncho gear.
Porsche sent them the guidelines for warranty versus non-warranty coverage
(by Porsche) in the form of pictures and instructions to the effect of, "If
the wear looks like this, it is an assembly problem and covered by Porsche
warranty. If it looks like the second picture, it is due to abuse and is
not covered."
The service manager told me mine looked exactly like the first, "assembly
issue" wear problem. They were awaiting confirmation by Porsche which means
the dealership will be reimbursed for the repair cost.
RCE
The Dead Senator - 15 Mar 2008 08:38 GMT
> Just an update for any who may be curious or interested. Today I talked to
> the service manager regarding progress on my 996TT.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> RCE
That's great news. Thanks for the update.
DS
95 993 Coupe
Guru - 16 Mar 2008 18:12 GMT
Works for me. And...you didn't have to use any of your "ammunition" to get
them to do the right thing.
>> Anyway, we'll see what happens next week. I explained that I understand
>> they are caught between a rock and a hard place and this situation is
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> RCE