I'd like to thank everyone for their suggestions. My first thought was a
weight distributing hitch to remedy the situation but it's not recommended
for my trailer ('03 Coleman Mesa), so I've been told.
A little more detail on what's leading to my situation. If I didn't know
better, I'd say Coleman made a bit of mistake with the floor plan and weight
distribution in my trailer. I have to consciously load up the front storage
box and front half of the trailer to minimize the sway at highway speeds.
Unfortunately, most of the key storage spots seem to be in the rear of the
trailer. Looks like in '04 they reversed the floor plan (front to back).
Coincidence?? Don't know.
Maybe I'm over reacting, but I've towed many different trailers in the past,
and this one seems to be overly sensitive to weight distribution.
Anyways, that's my reason for intentionally loading up the tongue weight a
bit and wanting to compensate on the truck.
Thanks again for all the feedback.
> A little more detail on what's leading to my situation. If I didn't know
> better, I'd say Coleman made a bit of mistake with the floor plan and weight
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Thanks again for all the feedback.
I just bought a 2005 Fleetwood Niagara and I agree that the tongue
weight is a little on the low side as a percentage of the total weight.
I will be putting about 200 pounds of stuff in the front compartment
to help reduce the risk of swaying. The dealer is also installing an
anti-sway hitch to reduce the problem that is frequently caused
when you only have one axle on a heavy pop-up.
Steph - 28 Feb 2005 17:43 GMT
>> A little more detail on what's leading to my situation. If I didn't
>> know better, I'd say Coleman made a bit of mistake with the floor
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> anti-sway hitch to reduce the problem that is frequently caused
> when you only have one axle on a heavy pop-up.
The above were concerns on mine when moving from a 12' to a smaller 10'
pop-up. The front storage box is a great feature, but the trailers I
towed didn't seem to be as stable. I chose to go with a Jayco Eagle
10UD (no front storage box). I get the tongue weight about about 14% and
it pulls very straight and stable with no sway.
I believe Coleman's, especially those with the front compartment and
designed to have a higher weight ratio on the tongue -- check the
owner's manual, it might be on the high-sdie or above 15% of the gross
trailer weight.

Signature
Stephen, Wife, Daughter, Son, and in-laws
San Diego, CA
2002 Grand Caravan ES 3.8L with tow package
2001 Saturn LW200 in Silver-Blue
2001 Jayco Eagle 10 UD
__________
/__________\_
|__|__|_____|---+
O
Mark Jones - 28 Feb 2005 23:45 GMT
> "Mark Jones" <noemail@mindspring.com> wrote in
> > I just bought a 2005 Fleetwood Niagara and I agree that the tongue
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> owner's manual, it might be on the high-sdie or above 15% of the gross
> trailer weight.
Fleetwood lists the unloaded weight as 3,095 lbs and the tongue
weight at 275 lbs. Less than 9% of the weight is on the tongue.
That I why I intend to put some weight up front to help reduce
the tendency to sway.
funny enough, Coleman had Reese design the Reese350 specially for their
pop-up??? it's a WDH with included AntiSway pads.
you may find a used one on e-bay...
Mel
Wally Korzenieski a écrit:
> I'd like to thank everyone for their suggestions. My first thought was a
> weight distributing hitch to remedy the situation but it's not recommended
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>> :)
>>JR
> I'd like to thank everyone for their suggestions. My first thought was a
> weight distributing hitch to remedy the situation but it's not recommended
> for my trailer ('03 Coleman Mesa), so I've been told.
I know I'm late jumping in here, but YOU WERE LIED TO. Reese makes a
version of the Mini-350 that is specifically designed for Coleman/Fleetwood
trailers. Some late model Fleetwoods have to have minor changes, but they
are considered a waranty item and will be done by Fleetwood at no cost to
you.
> A little more detail on what's leading to my situation. If I didn't know
> better, I'd say Coleman made a bit of mistake with the floor plan and
> weight distribution in my trailer. I have to consciously load up the front
> storage box and front half of the trailer to minimize the sway at highway
> speeds.
This needs to be done with any trailer, but yes, the 12' Coleman/Fleetwoods
are definitely tongue light.
> Unfortunately, most of the key storage spots seem to be in the rear of the
> trailer. Looks like in '04 they reversed the floor plan (front to back).
> Coincidence?? Don't know.
I doubt it. What surprises me is that they didn't do it years ago.
> Maybe I'm over reacting, but I've towed many different trailers in the
> past, and this one seems to be overly sensitive to weight distribution.
My experience as well.
> Anyways, that's my reason for intentionally loading up the tongue weight a
> bit and wanting to compensate on the truck.
Look at the Reese Mini-350 or the Mini-400 with sway bar.
Austin

Signature
Coleman Bayside behind a Chevy Astro.
No, not without a Reese Mini-350 WDH!
There are no X characters in my address
Gerry Pierce - 09 Mar 2005 15:50 GMT
When I bought my 99 Mesa, they had a trailer on the lot that was like a 98
model of the Mesa except no trunk in front and had the floorplan reversed.
I think it was a Sun valley??? That would put the storage under the couch
in the front.... maybe they thought the trunk would offset that weight all
the way in the rear on the Mesa but it didn't thats for sure. My Mesa empty
sways like crazy, if I load it correctly, it tows fine.--
Gerry & Robyn
99 Mesa
01 SportTrac
>> I'd like to thank everyone for their suggestions. My first thought was a
>> weight distributing hitch to remedy the situation but it's not
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Austin
Jim Redelfs - 09 Mar 2005 18:42 GMT
> maybe they thought the trunk would offset that weight all
> the way in the rear on the Mesa but it didn't thats for sure. My Mesa empty
> sways like crazy, if I load it correctly, it tows fine.--
Unless one is luckier than most, they use the camping trailer itself to HAUL a
lot of gear. Even WITH a front storage trunk, A LOT of gear is stashed inside
the camper door.
If the entry door to that camper is BEHIND the trailer's axle (aft of the
axle), the inclination is to load more heavily BEHIND the axle. This reduces
the hitch weight that is necessary to mitigate the tendency for any trailer to
sway while being towed. Users of such a camper should make an extra effort to
move as much weight FORWARD of the trailer's axle for better/safer towing
behavior.
I just perused the ENTIRE line of Fleetwood's folding campers. Check this out:
<http://www.fleetwoodrv.com/scorpion/>
That is pretty cool! :)
Anyway, I notice that there are NO floorplans anymore with the entry door aft
of the axle. It's a significant improvement, for sure.
:)
JR
AustinMN - 10 Mar 2005 04:12 GMT
<big snip>
> I just perused the ENTIRE line of Fleetwood's folding campers. Check this
> out:
>
> <http://www.fleetwoodrv.com/scorpion/>
>
> That is pretty cool! :)
Is this the first pop-up toybox trailer? Does it qualify as a toybox camper
if the "toybox" is open?
> Anyway, I notice that there are NO floorplans anymore with the entry door
> aft
> of the axle. It's a significant improvement, for sure.
It's only an improvement if the axle moved back at the same time. I believe
it would have had to on the Bayside, but I don't know about other models.
Something they should have done years ago. I wonder if this is an offshoot
of the Coleman/Fleetwood legal battles.
Austin

Signature
Coleman Bayside behind a Chevy Astro.
No, not without a Reese Mini-350 WDH!
There are no X characters in my address