Dear Mr. Premier
Your Mister of Tourism is pursuing small-minded and short-sighted policies
that will harm the Newfoundland and Labrador RV tourism industry.
From the CBC:
http://stjohns.cbc.ca/regional/servlet/View?filename=nf_rvs_20040913
ST. JOHN'S - The province's tourism minister says he's going to
enforce the rules against camping in mall parking lots.
Some tourism operators have complained that big-box stores have been
offering space in their lots to RV owners.
I have been to Newfoundland and Labrador a number of times and had been
planning an extended visit with my RV for the first time. However, I use the
"parking allowed at WalMart" (and other shopping centres) as a barometer to
judge how welcome RVs are in a jurisdiction. Shelley's pronouncement tells
me that I am not welcome in Newfoundland and Labrador. Despite my desire to
return, I will not visit your province as long as you pursue this course.
For the record, the vast majority of the time I stay in and pay for
accommodation in campgrounds.However, on occasion I need to pull off the
road and park at a shopping centre for one night because it's very late, all
the campgrounds are full, etc. The Canadian Federation of Independent
Business is shooting itself in the foot because they and your Minister
Shelley are causing people to question if they will be welcome in
Newfoundland and Labrador. Word spreads quickly via the internet.
A reasonable policy would be to allow ONE night of shopping centre parking.
I hope you will encourage your Minister Shelley to reconsider.
Yours truly,
Joe Bedford
Kanata Ontario
Just sent an email to the paper, to be forwarded to the minister. I
suggest that
anyone who cares do the same. I also suggest that anyone not interested
keep their imature thoughts to themselves.
> Dear Mr. Premier
>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> Joe Bedford
> Kanata Ontario
Ken Harrison - 28 Nov 2004 03:50 GMT
> Just sent an email to the paper, to be forwarded to the minister. I
> suggest that
> anyone who cares do the same. I also suggest that anyone not interested
> keep their [sic] imature [sic] thoughts to themselves [sic].
Now THERE'S a healthy point of view. If one disagrees, he is immature.
Somehow, I fail to see how that follows, but then I've often been
accused of wanting to hear all sides, as well as expressing my own
opinion about matters of interest.
Perhaps the immaturity shoe fits another foot.
Ken H
Montana Mike - 28 Nov 2004 04:22 GMT
>I also suggest that anyone not interested
> keep their imature thoughts to themselves.
Suggestion ignored. Sounds like someone that accepts whatever the government
says as fact. Also someone that could use a spell checker.
mike in montana
351CJ - 28 Nov 2004 06:14 GMT
> >I also suggest that anyone not interested
> > keep their imature thoughts to themselves.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> mike in montana
Mike,
If you are going to nit pick at spelling, you should at least capitalize
your name and the name of the state of Montana. That is no more optional
then spelling.
Tom Marik - 28 Nov 2004 13:03 GMT
Phil,
I have to say that the paragraph introducing your excellant note is not on par
with the note.
However, the important thing is that your method of dealing with the goverment
seems spot on and I hope others will follow.
Tom M
phil willen - 30 Nov 2004 03:00 GMT
Am I missing something here? I write magazine articles
and always spell check.
> Phil,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Tom M
Tom Marik - 30 Nov 2004 14:12 GMT
<< Am I missing something here? I write magazine articles
and always spell check.
Tom Marik wrote:
> Phil,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Tom M >><BR><BR>
Phil,
Your not was strong and might actually change opnions to effect change.
Your introduction turned off anyone who didn't already agree with you.
Tom M