Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / RVs / January 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Stay home!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Hp - 22 Jan 2005 15:09 GMT
After reading the gun toting posts,my advise is if you are that scared to be
on the road stay home.  In order to effectively use a gun you must be wide
awake,practice regularly and be in pretty decent physical and mental health.
I am not against guns having shot competively and professionally for over 40
years. I am more afraid of  a fellow camper or rv'er  shooting at a
perceived threat and putting a round into my rig or another innocent parties
rig than I am of the very slim chance that some miscreant is going to try
breaking in while we're asleep.  If you must buy one of those yappy dogs
that we always see with the motor home crowd.  Even pepper spray inside a
confined space is pushing it abit. How many of you have ever sprayed someone
in a mobile home with pepper spray in order to make an arrest?  I have and
being in good health it still raises hell with you.  Now let's add
age,infirmities such as emphysema and other respiratory conditions and it's
not going to be pretty.  If there's two of you and you feel threatenened one
of you go to the steeering wheel and hit the horn button for all your worth.
the other can try and defend the home if practical. make noise,flash the
lights,draw attention the bad guy will leave. Your problems will not end by
simply shooting someone.  You will most likely to
detained,held,interviewed,charged with gun violations if no permit. Then
comes the court subpeonas,civil suits. your life will be turned upside down.
In other words make damn sure that carrying a weapon is going to be worth
it.
Leanne - 22 Jan 2005 16:00 GMT
> After reading the gun toting posts,my advise is if you are that scared to be
> on the road stay home.  In order to effectively use a gun you must be wide
> awake,practice regularly and be in pretty decent physical and mental health.
> I am not against guns having shot competively and professionally for over 40
> years.

I have watched the carry no carry thing here and on
rec.boats.cruising. What it comes to, is can you shoot someone
that is facing you staring you eye to eye. Have you ever shot
someone? Could you do it again? I have shot to kill  and I never
want to do it again. I was competitive shooter, both rifle and
pistol and following that, I got rid of all of my guns as I lost
my taste for shooting. I think that a panic button approach with
a relay that turns on the four way flashers and beeps the horn
with them. The button or buttons can be placed anywhere in the
coach. Possibly wired to the magnetic switch for the steps so
when the door is opened the alarm goes off. There are many
things that can be done as an alternative to carrying a pistol.

Leanne
bug - 23 Jan 2005 19:19 GMT
[snip]

> There are many
> things that can be done as an alternative to carrying a pistol.

Name five.

-bug

> Leanne
Gordon J. Gibson - 22 Jan 2005 16:45 GMT
Hear Hear. One of the more intelligent comments on guns and RVs I've seen in
this newsgroup in many a year.
> After reading the gun toting posts,my advise is if you are that scared to
> be on the road stay home.  In order to effectively use a gun you must be
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> turned upside down. In other words make damn sure that carrying a weapon
> is going to be worth it.
Geoff - 22 Jan 2005 21:31 GMT
> Hear Hear. One of the more intelligent comments on guns and RVs I've seen
> in this newsgroup in many a year.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>> be turned upside down. In other words make damn sure that carrying a
>> weapon is going to be worth it.

I agree most emphaticaly. I am veteran and I have seen the damage a bullet
will do. Some of these insane people carry guns that are poweful enough to
go through several RV's. If they kill someone by mistake they should be
charged with murder 1. Also if you look at the anger these guys show at the
smallest post on here and RORT even a pea shooter is too poweful for them.
Geoff.
bug - 23 Jan 2005 19:25 GMT
> Hear Hear. One of the more intelligent comments on guns and RVs I've
> seen in this newsgroup in many a year.

Actually, there is nothing "intelligent" about advocating not carry a
handgun.

What I don't like is people who don't carry trying to make their view right
for everyone else.

If you want to legally carry, do it!

If you don't want to carry, then don't do it!

-bug
Jud Hardcastle - 22 Jan 2005 17:23 GMT
> After reading the gun toting posts,my advise is if you are that scared to be
> on the road stay home.  In order to effectively use a gun you must be wide

I was tent camping in Colorado many years ago when some escaped convicts
went through the National Forest campground next down the road from the
one I was in--randomly shooting into tents and campers.  Several people
killed and more injured.  Made the TV news all the way down in central
Texas and almost drove my parents nuts until I called home (before the
days of cellular).  I didn't take a handgun because I was concerned
about being legal.  I vowed then that I would NEVER be caught again
without any way to defend myself from the crazies out there.

A few years later--still tent camping--I pulled into a roadside park on
my way through the panhandle of Texas--probably about midnight.  I was
about half asleep when I saw two cars pull in from opposite directions--
I could see people moving between the cars. My first thought was drug
related and I made sure my handgun was accessable.  Next thing all hell
broke loose with occupants of both cars firing at each other.  They both
finally took off--without leaving any bodies--and people started popping
out of parked cars and 18 wheelers.  My gun wasn't needed--but it could
easily have been if one of those blokes had been left behind and he/she
decided they needed another car.  Could I have used a shotgun--in the
car--highly unlikely.  I'll keep toting my handgun thankyou--only now I
do it with a CHL.
Signature

Jud
Dallas TX USA

Jenny6833A - 22 Jan 2005 18:31 GMT
Jud Hardcastle l5i5changethistodash5rbo@xemaps.removethis.com says in part

>I was tent camping in Colorado many years ago when some escaped convicts
>went through the National Forest campground next down the road from the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>about being legal.  I vowed then that I would NEVER be caught again
>without any way to defend myself from the crazies out there.

Do you also carry a canopy to protect against meteors?

:-)

Jenny
HD in NY - 22 Jan 2005 19:39 GMT
> Jud Hardcastle l5i5changethistodash5rbo@xemaps.removethis.com says in part
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Jenny

That's about the dumbest comment you've ever made.
HD in FL
RAM^3 - 22 Jan 2005 19:41 GMT
>> Jud Hardcastle l5i5changethistodash5rbo@xemaps.removethis.com says in
>> part
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> That's about the dumbest comment you've ever made.
> HD in FL

Naaahhhh! - it's about the middle of her spectrum. (c8
Jenny6833A - 22 Jan 2005 20:20 GMT
HD in NY error@error.com says

>> Jud Hardcastle l5i5changethistodash5rbo@xemaps.removethis.com says in part
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>>
>> Jenny

>That's about the dumbest comment you've ever made.
>HD in FL

That's your usual assinine response which contains not even the slightest
attempt -- due to inability, no doubt -- to explain why you disagree.

:-)

Jenny
unkadean - 23 Jan 2005 01:09 GMT
>>> Do you also carry a canopy to protect against meteors?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>Jenny

OK, missie, what the hell do meteors have to do with protection from
people intent on doing someone harm?

Do you have any friends or do you dis everyone?
HD in NY - 23 Jan 2005 02:34 GMT
snipped
> That's your usual assinine response which contains not even the slightest
> attempt -- due to inability, no doubt -- to explain why you disagree.

Really? And since when does a stupid comment deserve a
reason for rebuke? Your one liner was just plain stupid, got
that, *STUPID*.
HD in FL
Geoff - 23 Jan 2005 03:15 GMT
> snipped
>> That's your usual assinine response which contains not even the slightest
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> HD in FL
>--------------------
Really? I just read it as "You can't protect yourself from everthing in this
world."
Some of you Guys are just too paranoid.
Geo0ff.
bug - 23 Jan 2005 19:29 GMT
>> snipped
>>> That's your usual assinine response which contains not even the
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> this world."
> Some of you Guys are just too paranoid.

I doubt you'll be singing that same tune -- God forbid -- if you ever
become the victim of a violent crime.

-bug

> Geo0ff.
Jenny6833A - 23 Jan 2005 19:38 GMT
"Geoff" Tiredof Spam@primus.ca says

>> Your one liner was just plain stupid, got that, *STUPID*.
>> HD in FL

>Really? I just read it as "You can't protect yourself from everthing in this
>world."

Well now, someone actually attempted to think a bit.  Geoff, it may well be no
coincidence that you're from CA -- which probably doesn't stand for California.

I'll accept your interpretation.

For the record, my intent was along the lines of,

    "Carrying a gun in an RV to stop homicidal invaders is about as useful as
putting up a canopy to stop meteors."

>Some of you Guys are just too paranoid.

They're paranoid and swimming in de Nile.

In addition, their 'manhood' (such as it may be) is all wrapped up in, and
totally dependent on, their fantasies of killing someone.

They've overdosed on Wyatt Erp and Billy the Kid.  

>Geo0ff.

:-)

Jenny
canoli@sbcglobal.net - 23 Jan 2005 04:20 GMT
>HD in NY error@error.com says
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>Jenny

When someone makes a comment that is so flagrantly ridiculous, it's
only polite to allow it to pass with minimal response.  

Otherwise, it's like parking a non-complying vehicle in a spot
reserved for the handicapped: easy to do but leaves a bad feeling, as
though you've taken advantage of someone unable to defend herself.

I'm curious about something, Jenny:  what sort of RV do you own, how
often do you use it, and where have you been with it?

Canoli
SteveB - 26 Jan 2005 14:20 GMT
> Jud Hardcastle l5i5changethistodash5rbo@xemaps.removethis.com says in part
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Jenny

Now be realistic!  It would actually be used to block the view of the moons
of flabby flaccid nudists.  ;-)

Steve
RAM^3 - 22 Jan 2005 19:39 GMT
> If there's two of you and you feel threatenened one of you go to the
> steeering wheel and hit the horn button for all your worth.

That won't work very well if you're in a trailer (pop-up, TT, or 5er) or in
a slide-in camper since the "perceived threat" will be between you and the
cab!

Cell phones have their good points - WHEN you can get a signal and WHEN law
enforcement can arrive quickly [less than 1/4 hour] enough to be of any
benefit.

The real key, as stated elsewhere, is whether or not the RVer is mentally
prepared to KILL another human being and suffer the consequences, if any, in
order to protect the RV, its occupants, and their possessions.

If not, then it's best to leave the guns at home or in the store lest the
"bad guy(s)" take them and use them themselves.
Jenny6833A - 22 Jan 2005 20:15 GMT
"RAM^3" S31924.nospam@netscape.net says

>The real key, as stated elsewhere, is whether or not the RVer is mentally
>prepared to KILL another human being and suffer the consequences, if any, in
>order to protect the RV, its occupants, and their possessions.

And whether the RVer sober and fully awake, is sure the human s/he kills is
actually a bad guy (as opposed to spouse, child, neighbor, etc) and that the
RV, its occupants, and their possessions are really, really threatened.

>If not, then it's best to leave the guns at home or in the store lest the
>"bad guy(s)" take them and use them themselves.

Uh huh.

:-)

Jenny

Before emailing, remove Clothes
RAM^3 - 22 Jan 2005 22:31 GMT
> "RAM^3" S31924.nospam@netscape.net says
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> the
> RV, its occupants, and their possessions are really, really threatened.

It's all about "perception" - sobriety is rarely a consideration - and the
question is still mindset: if the RVer isn't prepared *at all times* to
"waste" *ANY* individual that poses *ANY* threat then:

>>If not, then it's best to leave the guns at home or in the store lest the
>>"bad guy(s)" take them and use them themselves.
>
> Uh huh.

Disarming an idiot [someone who thinks that merely brandishing a weapon will
deter] is a simple undertaking since the idiot won't shoot *no matter what*.

> :-)
>
> Jenny
>
> Before emailing, remove Clothes

Jenny, I have doubts that you'd be willing to "bust a cap" on
anyone/anything and, thus, think that you should avoid being around firearms
of any kind.
bug - 23 Jan 2005 19:38 GMT
>> "RAM^3" S31924.nospam@netscape.net says
>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> will deter] is a simple undertaking since the idiot won't shoot *no
> matter what*.

I agree that brandishing a weapon is not a good deterent.

My rule of thumb is I never aim my handgun at someone or something I don't
intend to shoot.

> Jenny, I have doubts that you'd be willing to "bust a cap" on
> anyone/anything and, thus, think that you should avoid being around
> firearms of any kind.

Yep.

-bug
Glenn - 24 Jan 2005 15:41 GMT
> My rule of thumb is I never aim my handgun at someone or something I don't
> intend to shoot.
>
> -bug

To bad, you have not aimed your gun at your head, then follow trough on you
intend. Glenn
bug - 24 Jan 2005 19:02 GMT
>> My rule of thumb is I never aim my handgun at someone or something I don't
>> intend to shoot.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> To bad, you have not aimed your gun at your head, then follow trough on you
> intend. Glenn

What else does a red-neck do when he doesn't have an argument?  You just
showed me.

I don't what state you're living in, but in most U.S. states if you're out
there brandishing your firearm willy-nilly, you will be arrested.  Hence,
my saying I won't point my gun at anyone I'm willing to shoot -- with the
implication that my life is under threat.

-bug
bug - 23 Jan 2005 19:35 GMT
>> If there's two of you and you feel threatenened one of you go to the
>> steeering wheel and hit the horn button for all your worth.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> law enforcement can arrive quickly [less than 1/4 hour] enough to be of
> any benefit.

Agreed.

> The real key, as stated elsewhere, is whether or not the RVer is
> mentally prepared to KILL another human being and suffer the
> consequences, if any, in order to protect the RV, its occupants, and
> their possessions.

As one who would follow the letter of the law regarding self-defense and
justifiable homocide, yes, I am mentally prepared to kill another human
being and suffer the consequences, if any, to protect my life or the lives
of the people in my RV.

I wouldn't beout to shoot someone willy-nilly.  As I've read up on self-
defense and justifiable homocide laws around the country (USA), I stress I
will follow the letter of the law.

-bug

> If not, then it's best to leave the guns at home or in the store lest
> the "bad guy(s)" take them and use them themselves.
unkadean - 24 Jan 2005 18:51 GMT
>As one who would follow the letter of the law regarding self-defense and
>justifiable homocide, yes, I am mentally prepared to kill another human
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>-bug

But jenny has stated that you cannot stop a 'homicidal maniac' with a
gun.  Why bother.  You're dead!

Unk
bug - 24 Jan 2005 19:04 GMT
>>As one who would follow the letter of the law regarding self-defense and
>>justifiable homocide, yes, I am mentally prepared to kill another human
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> But jenny has stated that you cannot stop a 'homicidal maniac' with a
> gun.  Why bother.  You're dead!

Well, all I can say is Jenny has a right to express her opinion.

-bug

> Unk
DN B - 23 Jan 2005 00:00 GMT
'After reading the gun toting posts,my advise is if you are that scared
to be on the road stay home.'

And let the Terrorists in America win ?!

'In order to effectively use a gun you must be wide awake,practice
regularly and be in pretty decent physical and mental health. '

I practice at the Indoor Shooting Range often and can hit a target with
the majority of shots fired,  the size of a half dollar from 15 feet
away. IVe also had professional instruction in a course that lasted the
entire weekend.

'I am more afraid of a fellow camper or rv'er shooting at a perceived
threat and putting a round into my rig or another innocent parties rig '

Then, STAY HOME !

'and you feel threatenened one of you go to the steeering wheel and hit
the horn button for all your worth. the other can try and defend the
home if practical. make noise,flash the lights,draw attention the bad
guy will leave.'

Im sure the attacker would get a kick out of this,  if you were deep in
the woods away from others.

'Your problems will not end by simply shooting someone. You will most
likely to detained,held,interviewed,charged with gun violations if no
permit. Then comes the court subpeonas,civil suits. your life will be
turned upside down. In other words make damn sure that carrying a weapon
is going to be worth it.'

At least ill be ABLE to go to court !

With the increased immorality and valueless people on the rise in
America...there is no better time than to get a FOID card , buy a Pistol
, practice often so you become very good with it, and dont ever forget
that the jerk who decides he wants your money even if it comes with your
life...might be making your acquaintance tomorrow.
KissHanksAss - 23 Jan 2005 01:17 GMT
> 'After reading the gun toting posts,my advise is if you are that scared >
> to be on the road stay home.'
>
> And let the Terrorists in America win ?!>

And just which mythical terrorists in America would they be? You paranoid
a.shole! You even dodged the draft by leaving the country, so don't tell us
carrying a gun is fighting terror.

> 'In order to effectively use a gun you must be wide awake,practice >
> regularly and be in pretty decent physical and mental health. '>

The mental health bit immediately lets you out davey boy!

> I practice at the Indoor Shooting Range often and can hit a target with >
> the majority of shots fired,  the size of a half dollar from 15 feet >
> away. IVe also had professional instruction in a course that lasted the >
> entire weekend.>

The whole weekend? WOW!

> 'I am more afraid of a fellow camper or rv'er shooting at a perceived >
> threat and putting a round into my rig or another innocent parties rig '
>
> Then, STAY HOME !>

No the answer is get rid of guns:-

The Impact of Firearm Deaths on Life Expectancies in the United States
Jean Lemaire
Wharton School
University of Pennsylvania
lemaire@wharton.upenn.edu
Abstract. The 2000 US life expectancy only ranks 28th
among the world's 34 richest countries.

At 76.9 years, it stands 2.29 years below the average of these affluent
countries. We investigate one of the possible causes of this life expectancy
gap: the widespread availability of firearms and the resulting high number
of US firearm fatalities: 10,801 homicides in 2000. The European Union, with
a total population of 376 million,
experienced 1,260 homicides. Japan, with a population of 127 million, only
reported 22 homicides. Using multiple decrement techniques, we show that
firearm violence shortens the life of an average American by 104 days (167
days for white males, 362 days for  black males). Among all accidental
deaths, only motor vehicle accidents have a stronger  effect. The
elimination of all firearm deaths in the US would increase the overall life
expectancy more than the total eradication of all breast and prostate
cancers. We also show that the insurance premium increases paid by Americans
as a result of firearm violence are probably of the same order of magnitude
as total medical costs due to gunshots or the increased cost of
administering the criminal justice system due to the availability of
firearms.

> 'and you feel threatenened one of you go to the steeering wheel and hit >
> the horn button for all your worth. the other can try and defend the >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Im sure the attacker would get a kick out of this,  if you were deep in >
> the woods away from others.>

What's it like Dave to be in such constant fear? Anyway I thought your
imaginary friend was supposed to protect you.

> 'Your problems will not end by simply shooting someone. You will most >
> likely to detained, held, interviewed, charged with gun violations if no >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> At least ill be ABLE to go to court !>

And then hopefully spend a long time in prison for non justified homicide!

> With the increased immorality and valueless people on the rise in >
> America...

Justify that statement!

there is no better time than to get a FOID card , buy a Pistol > , practice
often so you become very good with it, and dont ever forget > that the jerk
who decides he wants your money even if it comes with your > life...might be
making your acquaintance tomorrow.

Does that mean he might be the HVAC HACKMAN who comes to rip you off?
Ed B - 23 Jan 2005 13:20 GMT
<snip>
> No the answer is get rid of guns:-
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> of administering the criminal justice system due to the availability of
> firearms.
<end snip>

We all know that the criminal mind isn't willing to violate a "no firearm
law", since they almost always follow the current laws. Those who
might decide after all that "the law is the law" - wouldn't consider using a
knife or baseball bat as the weapon of choice - Therefore elimination
of all firearms would mean the elimination of every one of those homicides
and the resulting cost of administering the justice system?

NOT even close IMHO

Ed
Jenny6833A - 23 Jan 2005 20:03 GMT
"KissHanksAss" kisshanksass@webtv.net  says

<snip>

Are you really Hank?  Do you have a website?  Is it this one?

   http://www.jhuger.com/kisshank.mv

Or are you really Karl?

Or maybe the guy who opens the door?
KissHanksAss - 29 Jan 2005 00:15 GMT
> "KissHanksAss" kisshanksass@webtv.net  says
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Or maybe the guy who opens the door?

I'm Hank, but that's not my website although I do agree with the sentiments.
And when I'm feeling bored I just like giving Dave a hard time, as he has
trolled for so long in groups I've used, pushing his fundamentalist agenda
on others, for example Alt.hvac, alt-autos.corvette and the swingers groups.
Eddie - 23 Jan 2005 06:57 GMT
>At least ill be ABLE to go to court !
Good point. And to a certain extent I agree with Hp, Leanne and Geoff.
I am well trained (ex-cop) and so is my wife and two adopted
granddaughters.  We shoot .38, .45, and .22 pistols, two .22 rifles,
one 30.30 Russian rifle and an 870 Wingmaster.  The girls are 10 and
11 and have been shooting since 5 and 6.  As I stated on another
thread, my first two chambers have shotshell.  If someone breaks into
my well locked Holiday Rambler, and I'm inside, I'll be wide awake if
one enters.  I highly recommend shotshells for the inexperience
shooter.
I'm not going to brag of my groupings at 50 yards with a 6 inch
service revolver, just be sure of *your* capabilities and limitations,
that's all.  
Eddie

>With the increased immorality and valueless people on the rise in
>America...there is no better time than to get a FOID card , buy a Pistol
>, practice often so you become very good with it, and dont ever forget
>that the jerk who decides he wants your money even if it comes with your
>life...might be making your acquaintance tomorrow.
DN B - 23 Jan 2005 13:14 GMT
'Good point. And to a certain extent I agree with Hp, Leanne and Geoff.
I am well trained (ex-cop) and so is my wife and two adopted
granddaughters. We shoot .38, .45, and .22 pistols, two .22 rifles, one
30.30 Russian rifle and an 870 Wingmaster. The girls are 10 and 11 and
have been shooting since 5 and 6. As I stated on another thread, my
first two chambers have shotshell. If someone breaks into my well locked
Holiday Rambler, and I'm inside, I'll be wide awake if one enters. I
highly recommend shotshells for the inexperience shooter.
I'm not going to brag of my groupings at 50 yards with a 6 inch service
revolver, just be sure of *your* capabilities and limitations, that's
all.
Eddie'

Eddie,   Looks like you live in Hawaii ?? Whats the crime situation like
over there ? Give us a rundown on what 'shotshells' are and how they
work. Thanks.
Eddie - 24 Jan 2005 08:44 GMT
>Eddie,   Looks like you live in Hawaii ?? Whats the crime situation like
>over there ? Give us a rundown on what 'shotshells' are and how they
>work. Thanks.
Nope.  Live now in San Jose since 1976.  Bought the first house we saw
for 41K.  Worth over 600K now.  Totally insane!

San Jose is the safest large city in the United States four years in a
row.  Last year, El Paso was second and Honolulu was third.
Stay away from Detroit, Dallas, Miami, San Francisco and Oakland.

Was a Honolulu police officer, came to the mainland and joined the UC
Santa Cruz PD, and finally finished at Santa Barbara PD.
Shotshells are very miniature shells like shotgun shells with a
plastic tip instead of paper like shotgun shells.  They hold 160 tiny
steel pellets.  I have them for my .22 and .38 handguns.  They are
also known as snake shot, being used maybe by ranchers when out on
their property where snakes live, <?> (fyi they are expensive.)

Eddie
bug - 23 Jan 2005 19:42 GMT
>>At least ill be ABLE to go to court !
> Good point. And to a certain extent I agree with Hp, Leanne and Geoff.
> I am well trained (ex-cop) and so is my wife and two adopted
> granddaughters.  We shoot .38, .45, and .22 pistols, two .22 rifles,
> one 30.30 Russian rifle and an 870 Wingmaster.  The girls are 10 and
> 11 and have been shooting since 5 and 6.

[snip]

I admire you training your granddaughters to use fireamrs, but I think 5
and 6 was TOO young to get them started.

-bug

 
> Eddie
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>that the jerk who decides he wants your money even if it comes with your
>>life...might be making your acquaintance tomorrow.
RAM^3 - 23 Jan 2005 21:03 GMT
>>>At least ill be ABLE to go to court !
>> Good point. And to a certain extent I agree with Hp, Leanne and Geoff.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I admire you training your granddaughters to use fireamrs, but I think 5
> and 6 was TOO young to get them started.

Why?

I was 5 when my Dad taught me to shoot, safely and accurately, and to handle
firearms.

Only when he was _sure_ that I would (not just could) handle them properly
and safely did he buy me my first Daisy BB gun.

My Dad was "big" on safety and taught me to be the same way. As usual, he
was right.
bug - 24 Jan 2005 06:47 GMT
>>>>At least ill be ABLE to go to court !
>>> Good point. And to a certain extent I agree with Hp, Leanne and Geoff.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Why?

Because a 5-year old doesn't have the maturity to handle a firearm -- or
anything else of importance or danger.

> I was 5 when my Dad taught me to shoot, safely and accurately, and to
> handle firearms.

I think it's irresponsible for *anyone* to let a child under 12 handle
*any* kind of weapon.  Just plain irresponsible.

> Only when he was _sure_ that I would (not just could) handle them
> properly and safely did he buy me my first Daisy BB gun.
>
> My Dad was "big" on safety and taught me to be the same way. As usual,
> he was right.

I think your Dad -- and any other like-thinking Dad -- has a skewed sense
of responsibilty.

Again, any child under 12 years of age should *not* be handling firearms.  
Moreover, I think it's just a way for fathers to stroke their own ego.

"Son, you're a chip off the 'ole man."

-bug       
RAM^3 - 24 Jan 2005 16:10 GMT
>>>>>At least ill be ABLE to go to court !
>>>> Good point. And to a certain extent I agree with Hp, Leanne and Geoff.
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> -bug

Well, you're entitled to your own, albeit warped, opinion. <G>

You must be a city-dweller: people in "the country" know that firearms are
simply tools - like hammers, shovels, saws, screwdrivers, tractors, etc. -
that serve a specific purpose and that children are best off learning to
handle them safely *before* they develop "bad habits" concerning them.

When the kid is well aware that, once shot through the head/heart, no
once-living thing is going to get back up and run around (like the cartoons
show) and, after (s)he has skinned, "cleaned", and, after cooking, has eaten
it, dead means just that and *not* just the end of the actor's role in
*this* program.

This is something that should be learned at an early, very early, age so
that it will never be forgotten.
bug - 24 Jan 2005 19:08 GMT
>>>>>>At least ill be ABLE to go to court !
>>>>> Good point. And to a certain extent I agree with Hp, Leanne and
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> This is something that should be learned at an early, very early, age so
> that it will never be forgotten.

I agree with much of what you've said.  However, my main disagreement is
one of cut-off age for a child to handle a firearm.

I don't believe children under 12 years should be handling these weapons.

-bug
RAM^3 - 24 Jan 2005 21:55 GMT
>>>>>>>At least ill be ABLE to go to court !
>>>>>> Good point. And to a certain extent I agree with Hp, Leanne and
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
>
> -bug

Been to East L.A. recently? Houston's Third Ward?

Most gang shooters are under 12 since, as juveniles, they just get sent home
to Momma or sent to foster care. They're back on the street before the
paperwork is finished.

Obviously, *someone* disagrees with you. <G>
bug - 27 Jan 2005 05:30 GMT
>>>>>>>>At least ill be ABLE to go to court !
>>>>>>> Good point. And to a certain extent I agree with Hp, Leanne and
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
>
> Obviously, *someone* disagrees with you. <G>

I'm well aware of kids and young people possessing and using firearms in
criminal activity.  However, I wasn't referring to this -- and I'm sure you
know this.

-bug
RAM^3 - 28 Jan 2005 20:59 GMT
>>>>>>>>>At least ill be ABLE to go to court !
>>>>>>>> Good point. And to a certain extent I agree with Hp, Leanne and
[quoted text clipped - 74 lines]
>
> -bug

Review the text quoted above and, using only quotations taken directly
from the quoted text, show me, specifically, where you indicated any such
limitation.

For example, you specifically stated:

________________________________________

>>>>> Because a 5-year old doesn't have the maturity to handle a firearm
>>>>> -- or anything else of importance or danger.

__________________________________________

Your turn!
unkadean - 24 Jan 2005 19:18 GMT
>I think it's irresponsible for *anyone* to let a child under 12 handle
>*any* kind of weapon.  Just plain irresponsible.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>-bug       

You 'think' a lot.  Why do you "think" that?  Is this "think" based on
beliefs or 'feelings'?  In any event, you may "think" what you want so
long as you let me think as I want, unless you can show me proof that
your way of thinking is the only valid way!

I am willing to be convinced.
bug - 27 Jan 2005 21:15 GMT
>>I think it's irresponsible for *anyone* to let a child under 12 handle
>>*any* kind of weapon.  Just plain irresponsible.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> long as you let me think as I want, unless you can show me proof that
> your way of thinking is the only valid way!

Where in my posting did I write that my way of thinking is the "only valid
way"?

> I am willing to be convinced.

I'm not here to change minds or to convince others to share mt view.

-bug
Frank Tabor - 23 Jan 2005 21:41 GMT
>>>At least ill be ABLE to go to court !
>> Good point. And to a certain extent I agree with Hp, Leanne and Geoff.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>I admire you training your granddaughters to use fireamrs, but I think 5
>and 6 was TOO young to get them started.

Bullshit, at 6 I was champ at the local Izaak Walton Park shooting in
NRA sanctioned rifle matches.  Shooting against the men.

At 10 I was regularly placing in pistol matches.  A child is old
enough to learn how to respect and use a firearm as soon as they are
comfortably able to handle the weapon.
Signature

Frank Tabor

bug - 24 Jan 2005 06:55 GMT
>>>>At least ill be ABLE to go to court !
>>> Good point. And to a certain extent I agree with Hp, Leanne and Geoff.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Bullshit, at 6 I was champ at the local Izaak Walton Park shooting in
> NRA sanctioned rifle matches.  Shooting against the men.

Name for me five places where a 6-year old can legally purchase a firearm.

> At 10 I was regularly placing in pistol matches.  A child is old
> enough to learn how to respect and use a firearm as soon as they are
> comfortably able to handle the weapon.

I don't care how comfortable a 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or 11-year old
is with handling a firearm.  No child should be touching a firearm.

Hmm...can't vote, drive, drink alcohol, join the military, marry, serve on
a jury, legally buy a gun, drop out of school, enter a bar, touch the
stove, adopt children -- but can use a firearm?

Nah.  I don't think so.

-bug
HD in NY - 24 Jan 2005 15:04 GMT
snipped
> I don't care how comfortable a 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or 11-year old
> is with handling a firearm.  No child should be touching a firearm.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Nah.  I don't think so.

Are you a PETA also?
HD in FL
RAM^3 - 24 Jan 2005 16:11 GMT
> Are you a PETA also?
> HD in FL

People Eating Tasty Animals!
bug - 24 Jan 2005 19:11 GMT
"RAM^3" <S31924.nospam@netscape.net> wrote in news:35kl39F4m8pm1U1
@individual.net:

>> Are you a PETA also?
>> HD in FL
>
> People Eating Tasty Animals!

Yep!

I'm a hunter and I find the taste of wild turkey quite delicious!    :)

-bug
RAM^3 - 24 Jan 2005 21:56 GMT
> I'm a hunter and I find the taste of wild turkey quite delicious!    :)

There are better Bourbons. <G>
bug - 27 Jan 2005 05:32 GMT
"RAM^3" <S31924.nospam@netscape.net> wrote in news:35l98oF4mc1tbU1
@individual.net:

>> I'm a hunter and I find the taste of wild turkey quite delicious!    :)
>
> There are better Bourbons. <G>

LOL!

Good one.

-bug
bug - 24 Jan 2005 19:10 GMT
> snipped
>> I don't care how comfortable a 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or 11-year
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Are you a PETA also?
> HD in FL

I presume you're asking me if I'm a member of the organizatin People for
the Ethical Treatment of Animals?

The answer is "no".

-bug
Frank Tabor - 24 Jan 2005 15:31 GMT
>>>>>At least ill be ABLE to go to court !
>>>> Good point. And to a certain extent I agree with Hp, Leanne and Geoff.
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
>-bug

You're just an ignorant troll.  f.ck off.
Buh bye!
Signature

Frank Tabor

bug - 24 Jan 2005 19:15 GMT
>>>>>>At least ill be ABLE to go to court !
>>>>> Good point. And to a certain extent I agree with Hp, Leanne and Geoff.
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> You're just an ignorant troll.  f.ck off.
> Buh bye!

I'm sure you have a deep love for our U.S. Constitution, right?

I've a right to express my opinion -- as long as it doesn't conflict with
*yours*.

Talk about being un-American.

Long Live Freedom of Speech!

-bug
(who doesn't take it personally if someone holds a differing view.)
Eddie - 24 Jan 2005 08:32 GMT
>I admire you training your granddaughters to use fireamrs, but I think 5
>and 6 was TOO young to get them started.
Don't think so.  Started them on a single shot, bolt action, youth .22
Marlin.  They complained that the bolt was to hard to handle and was
too slow to shoot.  So got 'em semi-autos with scope.  At 40 yards
with 3x scope they were hitting 4 inch clay pigeons.
Eddie
RAM^3 - 24 Jan 2005 16:21 GMT
>>I admire you training your granddaughters to use fireamrs, but I think 5
>>and 6 was TOO young to get them started.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> with 3x scope they were hitting 4 inch clay pigeons.
> Eddie

What did you use for targets on the *second* day? <G>

My sister and I each learned on .22 hulls at 50 yds. - first vertical (on a
stick) then end-on.

After we got good enough, the targets moved back to 100 yds.

Oh, yeah, we were using my Mom's .22/.410 - single-shot break action, open
sights - for quite a while before "moving up" to Dad's slide-action .22
repeater.

For a long time, the only scope was on my Daisy BB gun.
Will Sill - 24 Jan 2005 20:09 GMT
I see where "RAM^3" <S31924.nospam@netscape.net> contributed:

>My sister and I each learned on .22 hulls at 50 yds. - first vertical (on a
>stick) then end-on.
>
>After we got good enough, the targets moved back to 100 yds.

I didn't notice a <g> or a <G>, so I suppose you were just very very
good!

I once killed a woodchuck at 50 yards with a .22 revolver - while
standing and while the chuck was running full tilt.   Of course, I
always hasten to admit that was far more dumb luck than skill!

Will
You believe in evolution?  Then how do you explain our
politicians being worse every generation?  
RAM^3 - 24 Jan 2005 22:15 GMT
>I see where "RAM^3" <S31924.nospam@netscape.net> contributed:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> standing and while the chuck was running full tilt.   Of course, I
> always hasten to admit that was far more dumb luck than skill!

I've had a few of those myself. <G>

You're right, Will, there was no intent to stick in a <g> or  <G>: both my
parents were excellent shots and taught their children to be some also.

Mom was the better bird shooter: she *averaged* 3-of-5 dove on the wing with
her single-shot .410 whereas Dad burned more ammo filling _his_ bag. <G>

When shooting for recreation [as opposed to practice], I tend to stick with
the 300 and 500 yd. ranges so that I can get a better "feel" for how I'm
grouping the shots with my old '06. (It's a bit difficult to judge from a
barely-enlarged hole.)

For daily practice I've found that .177 pellets are both inexpensive and,
given adequate distance, challenging. The new crop of stick-on target
centers let me use a single target for a week or more and a pellet trap is
an easily-portable "instant backstop".
Will Sill - 25 Jan 2005 00:31 GMT
I see where "RAM^3" <S31924.nospam@netscape.net> contributed:

>When shooting for recreation [as opposed to practice], I tend to stick with
>the 300 and 500 yd. ranges so that I can get a better "feel" for how I'm
>grouping the shots with my old '06. (It's a bit difficult to judge from a
>barely-enlarged hole.)

Remind me never to accept a challenge to out-shoot you!   For me, a
500-yard target would have to be pretty big!

Will Sill
bug - 24 Jan 2005 19:22 GMT
>>I admire you training your granddaughters to use fireamrs, but I think 5
>>and 6 was TOO young to get them started.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> with 3x scope they were hitting 4 inch clay pigeons.
> Eddie

Though we disagree on the appropriate age for kids to handle firearms, I do
appreciate you expressing your view in a very mature and adult manner.

Personally, I think others in the group could take a lesson.

-bug

God Bless America and Long Live the United States Constitution!
Eddie - 25 Jan 2005 06:51 GMT
>Though we disagree on the appropriate age for kids to handle firearms, I do
>appreciate you expressing your view in a very mature and adult manner.
>
>Personally, I think others in the group could take a lesson.
>
>-bug
TY bug,
But I differ in the definition "handle"  My girls don't really
"handle" the weapons.  They just *shoot* them. I unlock the gun cases,
I removed the trigger locks, I load them and I clean them.  And that's
*after* we go over some very important safety rules.  Each time we
shoot I boringly (to them) go over every shooting rule to make sure
they thoroughly understand not only the rules that I have set, but the
universal rules everyone should follow when shooting.  We constantly
go over the use of the safeties for example.  Even when they say, "oh
grandpa, we know already"  I look at them and say, "give me rule #1"
This summer I may start teaching them how to handle weapons starting
with loading the .22 and .45 magazines and cleaning after the shoots.

Eddie

>God Bless America and Long Live the United States Constitution!
bug - 27 Jan 2005 05:56 GMT
>>Though we disagree on the appropriate age for kids to handle firearms, I
>>do appreciate you expressing your view in a very mature and adult
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Eddie

Hmm, I see.

Well, I must admit your insightful post really does tell me your girls have
quite a thorough instructor.  I think that's excellent.

Honestly, I've been known to re-think my position on many, many issues, and
frankly, this may be one of them.  Like many in our country, I, too, am
conditioned by cultural notion that automatically say kids and guns don't
mix.  Just straight across the board.  Maybe such a notion is simply too
rigid. But now, based on your post, I think a re-examination on my part is
certainly a fair thing to do.

-bug


>  
>>God Bless America and Long Live the United States Constitution!
Eddie - 28 Jan 2005 04:51 GMT
>>>Though we disagree on the appropriate age for kids to handle firearms, I
>>>do appreciate you expressing your view in a very mature and adult
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>rigid. But now, based on your post, I think a re-examination on my part is
>certainly a fair thing to do.
I'm glad to hear this bug, nice post reply.  Thanks for the
compliment.
Eddie
ps, I am not a card-carrying member of the NRA btw, just a law abiding
responsible citizen, teaching my two little ones how to "handle" guns
in a safe manner.  Oh, and I'm not a hunter either.  I've taught my
kids that shooting a defenseless animal is not sport.  But, I do love
my steaks, lol.

>-bug
>
>>  
>>>God Bless America and Long Live the United States Constitution!
Ken Bosch - 24 Jan 2005 17:10 GMT
>After reading the gun toting posts,my advise is if you are that scared to be
>on the road stay home.  In order to effectively use a gun you must be wide
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>In other words make damn sure that carrying a weapon is going to be worth
>it.

What price tag do you put on life?

Ken B.
RAM^3 - 24 Jan 2005 23:34 GMT
> What price tag do you put on life?

Mine or the person's (s'?) who attempts to take mine?

Mine will prove quite costly - the other(s) is(are) forfeit.
Ken Bosch - 25 Jan 2005 14:40 GMT
>> What price tag do you put on life?

>Mine or the person's (s'?) who attempts to take mine?
>
>Mine will prove quite costly - the other(s) is(are) forfeit.

I was referring to mine, my wife's, a loved one or any innocent
person.
As far as I'm concerned, no states laws will dictate whether or not I
defend myself or loved ones.
I'd rather be tried by 12 than carried by 6.

Ken B.

BTW, it's actually quite comforting to know that most of the RV'ers
(in here anyway) are armed. I'll sleep better the next time I'm out
and about.
Geoff - 25 Jan 2005 19:47 GMT
>>> What price tag do you put on life?
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> (in here anyway) are armed. I'll sleep better the next time I'm out
> and about.
=============
OR you could just travel in Canada where most people are sane!
============
Tom Wiley - 24 Jan 2005 19:31 GMT
> After reading the gun toting posts,my advise is if you are that scared
> to be on the road stay home.  In order to effectively use a gun you must
> be wide awake,practice regularly and be in pretty decent physical and
> mental

I agree with most of it.  Especially about knowing how to use a firearm.
Not just going into a store and buying a pretty hogleg, shooting up a box
of cartriages, reloading and then assuming that you are ready for all
comers.

Pistols are more deadly in the average shooters hands than for the
breaker-inner.  Even cops, in that instant of extreme excitement often
empty a whole cylinder at point blank range and miss every time.

A 12 gauge with number 9s is good.  Much less likely to go through the rig
next door and will still punch a big hole in a baddie inside your MH.
Plus, if you jack a round into the chamber in hearing of the invader AND
he doesn't beat feet instantly, then you know he is high on something and
it is time to shoot.  And the average state is much more forgiving of
possession of long gun than a handgun.

I am all for the shooting of criminals.  Line 'em up against the wall and
I will help you reload.  That being said, you need to think long and hard
about whether you want to actually pop the cap and kill someone when the
time comes. You need to think ahead of time about what you are going to
do, actually act out your actions that you will need to take, KNOW the
laws of the state you are in.  When you are actually pointing a gun at a
druggie busting down your front door is the wrong time to try to remember
if the safety should be flipped up - or down.?

I can speak from experience (in a house, not in a rig, and fortunately it
didn't come to actually pulling the trigger) that if the time DOES come,
it comes very fast, time for thinking is very short, and things will
happen without your actually being aware of thinking about it.

TW
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.