Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / RVs / March 2005
Class C motorhome vs Fifth wheel
|
|
Thread rating:  |
PCE - 28 Mar 2005 20:19 GMT Looking for any feedback from anyone owning one of these and who has put some thought in owning the other or anyone who has owned both.
We have 2 children aged 6 and 8.
The biggest plus for the motorhome is long distance travel for the kids, can sit back and watch videos, snooze comfortably and the driving is probably easier. Biggest downside is no travel vehicle when we get to the campsite. (dont plan on towing a small vehicle behind).
Biggest plus for Fifth wheel is I get to use the truck when I'm not camping so I dont need to buy a motorhome and a commute vehicle.
Any thoughts, experience or feedback of any type is appreciated. It can all help me in my decision.
Peter
Greg Surratt - 28 Mar 2005 22:45 GMT >Looking for any feedback from anyone owning one of these and who has put >some thought in owning the other or anyone who has owned both. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > >Peter Sounds like you've answered your own question.
If it's all about getting there and getting back, then the motorhome without the toad is the way to go.
If it's about sightseeing at the destination, then the fiver is the answer. Get a truck with a DVD player for the back seat to amuse the kids.
If you need the best of both worlds, then you probably need to reconsider the question of a toad.
FWIW, Dodge has announced a new four door truck with room in the backseat area for the seats to recline so the kids can snooze.
Greg
Jim Redelfs - 28 Mar 2005 22:54 GMT > Looking for any feedback from anyone owning one of these and who has put > some thought in owning the other or anyone who has owned both. I have come "full circle" in my view of a motorhome.
I used to consider it a WASTE of a good powertrain, DOT safety stuff, blah, blah, to have it (a motorhome) just SIT for most of the time.
I am now planning to eventually convert to a motorhome.
A large trailer (FW or TT) requires a large (read: gas guzzler) tow vehicle. Once setup at camp, this fire-breathing pickup is your "daily driver".
I like the idea of towing a SMALL (fuel efficient) car behind the motorhome for use when the motorhome is parked.
I am currently paying THROUGH THE NOSE for a big, stump-pullin', gas guzzlin' pickup to OCCASIONALLY tow my camping trailer. Otherwise, it is my commuter vehicle. Fortunately, the drive to work is a mere four miles.
I would not, however, use a motorhome WITHOUT a "toad" (towed vehicle) to use use when camped - or not camping.
:) JR
 Signature 2000 Skamper Ultra 249 TT 2002 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD Vortec 8100 - Allison 1000
RAM^3 - 28 Mar 2005 23:05 GMT > Looking for any feedback from anyone owning one of these and who has put > some thought in owning the other or anyone who has owned both. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Peter A lot depends upon HOW you plan to spend your time: traveling or staying put.
If your prime interest is traveling - on the road most of the time (going place-to-place, visiting "attractions", etc.) and rarely more than 1-2 nights in any one location - the "C" has the distinct advantage that all of its amenities are right with you where you can use them immediately. Another advantage is the ability to tow a trailer (boat, "utility trailer", ATVs, cycles (motor or pedal), or, even, a TT or popup) or a vehicle too small to "travel" in but great for "sightseeing" and/or "exploring".
If you prefer to set up a "base camp" and "explore" the surrounding area for a week or more then the towable has the advantage in that it can carry more amenities. Unfortunately, you have to find a parking spot before you can use them.
We have a small [37'] fifth-wheel that we tow with a dinky little Dodge Diesel Dually. We tend to stay in one spot for a month or 3, then travel to a new destination.
We've recently discussed acquiring either a "B" or a "C" as a "Tripmobile" to use for relatively short [2-4 days] trips rather than to tow our home around with us. The "Tripmobile" would simplify trips to urban areas since we'd be "urban flatspotting" rather than looking for "campgrounds".
The "Tripmobile" would stay at our house when we're out touring with our home.
HD in NY - 29 Mar 2005 00:00 GMT snipped
> The "Tripmobile" would stay at our house when we're out touring with our > home. Friends picked up a nice '90 Born Free. Former owner had painted it, trim and all, a nasty shade of blue. Dealer called it the "Blue Goose". They got it for $8,000. Six brand new tires, generator worked good, all appliances including a/c worked good and the inside looked real nice. HD in FL for 1 nite
RAM^3 - 29 Mar 2005 03:48 GMT > snipped >> The "Tripmobile" would stay at our house when we're out touring with our [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > appliances including a/c worked good and the inside looked real nice. > HD in FL for 1 nite We wouldn't mind lucking into one like that!
HD in NY - 29 Mar 2005 04:33 GMT >>snipped >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > We wouldn't mind lucking into one like that! We had a demonstration ride with John Dodgen as the driver. He's the guy in the left hand corner of this website; <http://www.bornfreemotorcoach.com/overview_1.cfm>
He's the guy who flipped one with his wife in the co-pilot seat. A real character <g>. HD in FL
Hunter - 29 Mar 2005 00:08 GMT >Biggest plus for Fifth wheel is I get to use the truck when I'm not camping >so I dont need to buy a motorhome and a commute vehicle. Bingo.... only one vehicle to maintain, insure, register.
Get a crew cab pick up to pull the fiver, the kids can watch movies in the back seat.
Hunter Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well-preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "...holy sh.t...what a ride!"
Will Sill - 29 Mar 2005 13:15 GMT I see where Hunter <HHamp5246@aol.com> contributed:
>Get a crew cab pick up to pull the fiver, the kids can watch movies in >the back seat. Not to pick on Hunter, but I for one find the idea of feeding kids the intellectual equivalent of contaminated pablum while traveling to be - well, repugnant. Kids today already get far too much drivel out of the TV. Travel is a wonderful opportunity for them to see the country as it is, and for parents to TEACH them about how people out of their own neighborhood live.
Of course, if you insist on traveling the interstate highway system, you won't have much material to work with!
Will Sill The list of subjects I care about is shrinking steadily. Items missing from that list include but are not limited to: - The views of moronic and anti-American nut cases - Terminally boring and/or thoughtless commentaries.
Hunter - 29 Mar 2005 15:55 GMT >Not to pick on Hunter, but I for one find the idea of feeding kids the >intellectual equivalent of contaminated pablum while traveling to be - >well, repugnant. I agree.... it was his idea to have them watching TV while riding in the motorhome.
Personally, I think looking out the window is entertaining... but that said, when I was a kid I hated the drive from NYC to Maryland to visit my grandparents.
I would much rather have been watching a video.... I'm sure my parents would have preferred it too.
I started asking, "Are we there yet?" after we went through the tunnel into New Jersey. <g>
Hunter Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well-preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "...holy sh.t...what a ride!"
wwemu@cwnet.com - 29 Mar 2005 18:10 GMT >I see where Hunter <HHamp5246@aol.com> contributed: > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >- The views of moronic and anti-American nut cases >- Terminally boring and/or thoughtless commentaries. I get physically ill when we accidently tune into one of these pc kids programs. They have more violence than any of the old Woody Woodpecker or Road Runner Cartoons. They emphasize talking back to parents and being disobedient. Most I have seen on PBS and other such crap stations. I think the adults that put this crap out should be publically flogged.
George
Hunter - 29 Mar 2005 23:52 GMT >I get physically ill when we accidently tune into one of these pc kids >programs. They have more violence than any of the old Woody Woodpecker >or Road Runner Cartoons. They emphasize talking back to parents and >being disobedient. Most I have seen on PBS and other such crap >stations. I think the adults that put this crap out should be >publically flogged. I agree, not that I watch them ...... best idea if you must is to put DVDs in a player.
Hunter Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well-preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "...holy sh.t...what a ride!"
Geoff - 29 Mar 2005 02:52 GMT > Looking for any feedback from anyone owning one of these and who has put > some thought in owning the other or anyone who has owned both. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Peter >==== I'm fairly new to motorhomes but what we have is a 21' C class. When we get to a campsite we don't hook up to the sewer, we just dump when we leave. We try to be tidy and put things away as we finish using them. If we want to go into town or look around a "little", we just use the motorhome. It's easy to drive and park in parking lots. Most of the vans and trucks you see in the city's are no smaller. If we want to drive a long distance and then do a "lot" of sight seeing we have a little 4 banger we tow behind. The extra gas I use in the Motorhome is more than compensated for by the daily savings in gas using the 4 banger. My friend goes the 5th wheel route and when we compare total fuel costs we come out way ahead. Geoff.
Propwash - 29 Mar 2005 10:23 GMT Hi Geoff, We are pretty new to the world of RVing too. We purchased our first MH, an inexpensive older 21' Class C, a couple of years ago. It was a good learning experience, and we enjoyed our little trips. Last year we upgraded to a new 21' Gulfstream BT Cruiser, which we really enjoy! We would like to get a small vehicle to tow when we go on a longer trip. Curious what we might need to consider (equipment, costs, etc.) to get set up....and some recommendations of good practical vehicle models, preferrably older! I've read so many postings about 2wd, 4wd, automatics, sticks, etc., that now I'm more confused than ever!! (Maybe I shouldn't have sold my '93 4 cyl stick Jeep Wrangler, but I just had too many problems having to drive on icy roads with it.... [:0(
Now I'm retired and don't have to make the daily commutes anymore!!
Paul
Geoff - 30 Mar 2005 05:55 GMT >Snip > models, preferrably older! I've read so many postings about 2wd, 4wd, [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Paul >==== I'm not an expert on this Paul, but I did a search and came up with http://www.ontheball.com/towbars_main.htm Hope it helps. you could ask on RORT. rec.outdoors.rv-travel If you tow it will not be cheap. You will also need a brake adapter for the toad vehicle. I believe you can tow anything if it's 2 WD and a stick. Geoff.
Propwash - 30 Mar 2005 10:29 GMT Thanks Geoff. I can see I need to do a lot of research. I always value opinions of others who have had favorable experiences. I have been reading the many postings on RORT about this, but in most cases, there are TOO many contradictory opinions!! [:0))
Paul
Geoff - 30 Mar 2005 16:16 GMT > Thanks Geoff. I can see I need to do a lot of research. I always > value opinions of others who have had favorable experiences. I have > been reading the many postings on RORT about this, but in most cases, > there are TOO many contradictory opinions!! [:0)) > > Paul ====== What do you mean Paul? Contradictory opinions on RORT? Never! <VBG> Geoff.
|
|
|