Interesting. Obviously the advances in energy generation have not
included inverter technology. This explains why I haven't found shelves
of 99 percent efficent inverters. This bodes ill for us in our coming
energy crisis since very few sources of alternate power deliver it at 110
volts AC. Since an average house has a 200 amp/220 volt service and would
require a 44000 watt inverter, you won't need a central heater since you
will automatically have one built in using the waste heat.
Maybe Edison was right and Westinghouse was wrong way back in the 19
century and we should have stuck to DC distribution:)
But seriously, since switching power supplies are getting very efficient
(the quality ones, that is - not the knockoffs made in Changching,
Slobbovia) I just assumed that the gadgets that went the other way were
improving also.
BH
> Interesting. Obviously the advances in energy generation
Advances, eh? And what might THOSE be? :)
> have not included inverter technology.
Oh, I dunno... As the OP said, 90% is particularly efficient. Heck, we
routinely replace 15-20% efficient incandescent lamps with more of the same
and think nothing of it.
> an average house has a 200 amp/220 volt service and would
> require a 44000 watt inverter, you won't need a central heater since you
> will automatically have one built in using the waste heat.
Hehehe! Then there's air conditioning season. <sigh>
> Maybe Edison was right and Westinghouse was wrong way back in the 19
> century and we should have stuck to DC distribution:)
Yep. With a dynamo on every corner. Wow. :)
> But seriously, since switching power supplies are getting very efficient
> (the quality ones, that is - not the knockoffs made in Changching,
> Slobbovia) I just assumed that the gadgets that went the other way were
> improving also.
I knew it was going to be even longer before I could afford a solar/inverter
installation sufficient to meet my needs that are now met with a Honda EU2000i
ultra quiet generator.
http://www.hondapowerequipment.com/eu2000.htm
Equivalent ALTERNATIVE energy just CO$T$ so much! <sigh>
:)
JR
TheSnoMan - 26 Sep 2005 14:48 GMT
>>Interesting. Obviously the advances in energy generation
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> :)
> JR
Actually power needs are not that high unless you have a all electric
home and heat with resistance strips (they are far worse than A/C's). In
the real world, you house if it has gas, oil or propane heat will likely
not see much above a 15kw load or so (less than 70 amps at 220 volts)
and a lot less most of the time and besides you could alway load shift
to limit power draw (like not run dryer when A/C is runs or other high
draw items. Also big pary of your load is lighting (a standard bulb is
only about 5% effiecent) and if you change to the newer hiefficency
bulbs you can cut a few KW's off of your peak load too with no loss of
lighting brightness.

Signature
-----------------
www.thesnoman.com
Chris Bryant - 26 Sep 2005 23:55 GMT
> Actually power needs are not that high unless you have a all electric home
> and heat with resistance strips (they are far worse than A/C's). In the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> effiecent) and if you change to the newer hiefficency bulbs you can cut a
> few KW's off of your peak load too with no loss of lighting brightness.
We have an all electric house- with the shop running on the same meter.
Small house (~1200 square feet), unheated/air conditioned shop
(another 1500 square feet), and a heat pump (though with heat strips), but
we do have several rigs plugged in and running at any one time. We are in
a "temperate" climate, and on our electric meter (a commercial electronic
model), the highest peak load we have ever seen is under 15kw, FWIW.

Signature
Chris Bryant
http://bryantrv.com