Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / RVs / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Buying an RV

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ninebal310@aol.com - 30 Oct 2005 15:29 GMT
 Some friends of mine are looking to buy an RV. They are looking at a
new Class A made by Monaco. They have no trade-in, and are arranging
their own financing.

  My question is: Since gas prices are high, summer is over and sales
are down, how much can they expect the dealer to drop off MSRP? Is 30%
off out of the question?

  Any other "buying tips" will be greatly appreciated.

Hank <~~~thinks the new "employee discount" program is BS.
Hunter - 30 Oct 2005 15:50 GMT
>  My question is: Since gas prices are high, summer is over and sales
>are down, how much can they expect the dealer to drop off MSRP? Is 30%
>off out of the question?

No, 30% off is not out of the question.

Hunter
--

http://members.aol.com/hhamp5246/roadtrip2005.htm

Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well-preserved body,
but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "...holy sh.t...what a ride!"
lanman - 30 Oct 2005 20:27 GMT
>>  My question is: Since gas prices are high, summer is over and sales
>>are down, how much can they expect the dealer to drop off MSRP? Is 30%
>>off out of the question?
>
>No, 30% off is not out of the question.

It seems 30% off MSRP may or may not be a good deal depending on the
markup. As with cars, isn't the key is knowing the dealer cost? Only
then can you determine if the dealer applied a reasonable profit, and
yes, the dealer deserves a profit. How does one go about finding the
dealer cost?
SteveB - 30 Oct 2005 17:27 GMT
> It seems 30% off MSRP may or may not be a good deal depending on the
> markup. As with cars, isn't the key is knowing the dealer cost? Only
> then can you determine if the dealer applied a reasonable profit, and
> yes, the dealer deserves a profit. How does one go about finding the
> dealer cost?

Easy.  You buy a dealership.

Why is it assumed that if you know the dealer cost that you improve your
bargaining position?

Why is it assumed that the dealer will somehow give you the unit at cost?

Why is it assumed that the dealer will somehow give you this inside
information out of the goodness of his heart?

Steve, who believes the best way to buy a MH is to pay cash and put the
interest money to work.
ninebal310@aol.com - 30 Oct 2005 23:23 GMT
> > It seems 30% off MSRP may or may not be a good deal depending on the
> > markup. As with cars, isn't the key is knowing the dealer cost? Only
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Why is it assumed that if you know the dealer cost that you improve your
> bargaining position?

I don't assume that, but others do. Others assume that because some
dealers advertise that they are selling at their cost. Of course we
know that is bullshit.

> Why is it assumed that the dealer will somehow give you the unit at cost?

They MAY sell it at their original cost according to the original
invoice (which they may show you). But, since then, the manufacturer is
apparently giving the dealer a rebate, kickback, incentive and etc.
that is unseen by/to the public.

> Why is it assumed that the dealer will somehow give you this inside
> information out of the goodness of his heart?

Because of the rebates, kickbacks and etc. stated ealier. It is still
not his "true" cost. If it were, he wouldn't be in business.

> Steve, who believes the best way to buy a MH is to pay cash and put the
> interest money to work.

I agree that Interest is wasted money. For some, they can deduct the
interest as a second home. So, it's not a total loss by paying
interest, but none the less, a loss. The lending institutions want us
to believe that financing is best.....more BS. Paying cash and taking
the standard deduction is ALWAYS better.

Hank
SteveB - 31 Oct 2005 01:03 GMT
Paying cash and taking
> the standard deduction is ALWAYS better.
>
> Hank

No, paying cash, and taking a larger deduction because you use the MH for
"justified and proveable" business use is the BEST.

Using the purchase during a year when you have substantial capital gains
make it almost a wash, and that's even better yet.

Steve
ninebal310@aol.com - 31 Oct 2005 02:35 GMT
>  Paying cash and taking
> > the standard deduction is ALWAYS better.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Steve

I was talking a personal use purchase. You are talking purchasing for a
business. Apples and oranges.

Hank
SteveB - 31 Oct 2005 02:53 GMT
>>  Paying cash and taking
>> > the standard deduction is ALWAYS better.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Hank

No, I was talking of ways to own an RV and have it cost less.  No matter
what the use.

Steve
lanman - 31 Oct 2005 05:49 GMT
>> It seems 30% off MSRP may or may not be a good deal depending on the
>> markup. As with cars, isn't the key is knowing the dealer cost? Only
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Easy.  You buy a dealership.

I didn't have to buy a dealership to get my last truck at $100 over
cost, including manufacturer holdbacks.

>Why is it assumed that if you know the dealer cost that you improve your
>bargaining position?

This is self-explanatory.

>Why is it assumed that the dealer will somehow give you the unit at cost?

Why do car dealers give sell at cost - because they have stock they
cannot sell any other way.

>Why is it assumed that the dealer will somehow give you this inside
>information out of the goodness of his heart?

He won't, but he'll do it if competition forces him to.
SteveB - 31 Oct 2005 02:56 GMT
>>> It seems 30% off MSRP may or may not be a good deal depending on the
>>> markup. As with cars, isn't the key is knowing the dealer cost? Only
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> He won't, but he'll do it if competition forces him to.

You, sir, are a salesman's dream.

COME ON DOWN.  WE'RE PRACTICALLY GIVING THEM AWAY, AND WE ARE MAKING HARDLY
ANY MONEY!

Add up all the property, payroll, insurance, overhead, advertising, and then
rethink your statements above.

And if you can find out where the dealership's owner lives, drive by and
have a look.  That is, if they will let you past the security gate.

Steve
Phil - 31 Oct 2005 03:17 GMT
>I didn't have to buy a dealership to get my last truck at $100 over
>cost, including manufacturer holdbacks.

Of course you did.  You just forgot to mention that cost included,
contribution to overhead, sales commission and a nice profit for the
owners of the business.

$100 over cost means nothing until you know all of the costs that are
included.  

THERE AIN'T NO FREE LUNCH.

Phil
SteveB - 31 Oct 2005 03:28 GMT
>>I didn't have to buy a dealership to get my last truck at $100 over
>>cost, including manufacturer holdbacks.

They let you in the back office and showed you all THOSE books?

Wow, dude.  You DO have some influence.

Steve
lanman - 01 Nov 2005 20:42 GMT
>>I didn't have to buy a dealership to get my last truck at $100 over
>>cost, including manufacturer holdbacks.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Phil

There are websites like edmunds.com that list vehicles including every
available option along with the dealer cost and MSRP for each item.
The dealer invoice shows the line items for local costs not reflected
at edmunds.com, including so-called garbage fees.

I took the edmunds.com printout to the dealer who, upon being asked,
showed me the invoice of the truck I wanted and even provided to me a
copy for the truck I eventually purchased. With vehicles, at least in
the Northeast, this is common practice in many areas. I made him an
offer which subtracted the factory holdback (2%) and garbage fees but
included regional advertising + $100.00. The dealer accepted. What did
he make? He unloaded a leftover truck from his lot on which he was
paying hefty finance charges (it was early December), he made room for
the new models which were beginning to stack up, and he added to his
sales numbers for the year - something very important to small dealers
who wish to stay in business.

I am of the opinion that knowledge is power, and while knowing dealer
costs for something certainly may not help you negotiate a lower
price, it also certainly cannot hurt you either. Regards...
Lou@GoForIt.net - 01 Nov 2005 18:08 GMT
> >>I didn't have to buy a dealership to get my last truck at $100 over
> >>cost, including manufacturer holdbacks.
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
> ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

You know the business well!

Lou
Dapper Dave - 03 Nov 2005 00:59 GMT
>"SteveB" <deserttraveler@cox.net> wrote:

>Steve, who believes the best way to buy a MH is to pay cash and put the
>interest money to work.

We financed our last two rigs because we were able to get 5% financing.
If my (tax-deferred) investments aren't doing better the 5%, I will be
sorely disappointed. (We don't have enough deductions to itemize.)

In our case, paying cash wouldn't make sense anyway. We are in the
unenviable position of paying ordinary income tax plus a 10% penalty on
almost every cent we spend, since it comes from early withdrawals from
IRAs. Withdrawing the price of a new RV would result in one hellacious
tax bill.

I guess we could have continued working for another five years and
avoided the early withdrawal penalties. <g> Not likely!

Signature

DD

mstick@gmail.com - 04 Nov 2005 19:03 GMT
not that it is any of my business but you might be able to avoid the
10% tax by following the regs on how to annuitize IRA withdrawls before
59 1/2.

>In our case, paying cash wouldn't make sense anyway. We are in the
>unenviable position of paying ordinary income tax plus a 10% penalty on
>almost every cent we spend, since it comes from early withdrawals from
>IRAs.
qwerty - 04 Nov 2005 20:30 GMT
> not that it is any of my business but you might be able to avoid the
> 10% tax by following the regs on how to annuitize IRA withdrawls before
> 59 1/2.

The IRS allows penalty free early withdrawals from an IRA if it's in
"Substantially Equal Periodic Payments" or SEPP.  This is outlined in IRS
rule 72(t).  This wouldn't avoid the ordinary income tax but would eliminate
the 10% penalty.  There are numerous sites explaining the rule.  Here's a
start:

http://www.401krolloveradvisors.com/distributions2.html
http://www.72t.net/

>>In our case, paying cash wouldn't make sense anyway. We are in the
>>unenviable position of paying ordinary income tax plus a 10% penalty on
>>almost every cent we spend, since it comes from early withdrawals from
>>IRAs.
Dapper Dave - 04 Nov 2005 21:17 GMT
>"mstick@gmail.com" <mstick@gmail.com> wrote:

>>In our case, paying cash wouldn't make sense anyway. We are in the
>>unenviable position of paying ordinary income tax plus a 10% penalty on
>>almost every cent we spend, since it comes from early withdrawals from
>>IRAs.

>not that it is any of my business but you might be able to avoid the
>10% tax by following the regs on how to annuitize IRA withdrawls before
>59 1/2.

Thanks for the suggestion.

We researched that with a CPA before we retired, but about two weeks
before we put the plan into place, the IRS changed the rules about the
interest rates that one could use as a basis for substantially equal
periodic payments. The new rules would have restricted our withdrawals
to an unacceptably low amount. It made more sense to pay the 10% penalty
for the 4-5 years that we would be making early withdrawals.

Signature

DD

Will Sill - 30 Oct 2005 19:32 GMT
I see where ninebal310@aol.com contributed:
>  Some friends of mine are looking to buy an RV. They are looking at a
>new Class A made by Monaco. They have no trade-in, and are arranging
>their own financing.

Why buy new?  If they have no trade in it suggests no prior
experience, in which case buying new is a mistake, IMO.  I have a
friend who is trying to find a buyer for his deceased father's 38'
Monaco Diplomat - last I knew he was asking only $75k and would
consider lower offers.

If your friends have a genuine interest, have them write me at
will@epix.net and I'll put them in touch.

Will Sill
The Curmudgeon of Sill Hill
Dapper Dave - 01 Nov 2005 00:49 GMT
>ninebal310@aol.com wrote:

>  Some friends of mine are looking to buy an RV. They are looking at a
>new Class A made by Monaco. They have no trade-in, and are arranging
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Hank <~~~thinks the new "employee discount" program is BS.

We have purchased two Monaco Class A motor homes. We paid 75% of MSRP on
one and 74% on the other. Those were essentially the prices the dealer
offered us.

I have never seen any evidence of seasonal variations in pricing, but
you can get the best deals by buying a new rig left over from the
previous model year. 30% off MSRP has certainly be doable on those rigs
in the past.

FWIW, Monaco is currently restructuring its franchise arrangements with
its dealers. One consequence of the new arrangements is rumored to be a
smaller discount from the manufacturer to the dealer, which would imply
a smaller discount off MSRP available to the buyer.

Signature

DD

tightwad - 02 Nov 2005 22:32 GMT
How about 93,000.00 off 247,000.00 MSRP?
tightwad - 03 Nov 2005 05:21 GMT
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.