Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / RVs / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

what's a good place to start?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Wayne - 12 Nov 2005 01:57 GMT
Hi. I am interested in buying a class I motorhome and would like to know
where is a good website to compare all the different types that are out
there.
Thanks.
Hunter - 12 Nov 2005 02:39 GMT
>Hi. I am interested in buying a class I motorhome and would like to know
>where is a good website to compare all the different types that are out
>there.
>Thanks.

Hi Wayne,

There's no designation in motorhomes for a Class I.

I think you mean a Class A?  There's class A,B and C motorhomes.

I suggest you go to a large dealer, or even better yet a big RV show
in your area.  Go in all the kinds.

Hunter
--

http://members.aol.com/hhamp5246/roadtrip2005.htm

Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well-preserved body,
but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "...holy sh.t...what a ride!"
no_spam@no_where.invalid - 16 Nov 2005 14:32 GMT
>I suggest you go to a large dealer, or even better yet a big RV show
>in your area.  Go in all the kinds.

And when you talk to the sales people believe everything they tell
you.  They never lie and know everything there is to know about every
rig they have on the lot.

But if they should lie for some reason you will know it, their lips
will move.
Signature

Gypsy Bill & Jo Ann Full timing RV'ers
reply to: az9b13d4j located at earthlink dot net

Ed - 12 Nov 2005 02:53 GMT
> Hi. I am interested in buying a class I motorhome and would like to know
> where is a good website to compare all the different types that are out
> there.
> Thanks.
Hi Wayne,

I would suggest that you take a look at this site.
http://www.rv.org/ or http://www.rv.com/
The first of the two is more objective, but in their own way are good.
A small point, but I guess by type I motorhome you mean the bus style?
Take a good look at what RV.ORG has to say about both the Class A's and
Class C's.
IMHO the well made Class C's offer more safety than a Class A in the
event of an accident.
Just a few days ago in the evening during a downpour an older fellow
came up on traffic that was going slow due to conditions. He tried
stopping, but realized he could not so severed to avoid rear ending a
semi trailer. He caught the left corner of the trailer smack dab in the
middle of his Class A I beileve a thirty plus foot Alpha. Don't quote me
on the brand, but it was a large Class A. To make a long story short it
split in two and were there a passenger in the right seat it was not
survivable at all.
We have a smaller Class C, and if kept lightly loaded I get 10 or so MPG
going to the Coast or the same up and over the Cascades and the
mountains streams I like to fish.

Good luck and seek out owners and take with a grain of salt what most
sales people say especially when it comes to capacities and what
something can tow.

Regards,
Ed
Wayne - 12 Nov 2005 04:23 GMT
>> Hi. I am interested in buying a class I motorhome and would like to
>> know where is a good website to compare all the different types that
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> Regards,
> Ed
Thanks for your help. I did mean a class A. Can you tell me why a class
C would be safer in an accident than a class A which is larger? I'm
looking in the 38 to 40 ft long.
Thanks
Jim Redelfs - 12 Nov 2005 05:11 GMT
> Can you tell me why a class C would be safer in
> an accident than a class A which is larger?

A Class C "mini" motorhome is built on a cutaway van chassis.  That is, it is
just like a full-size van up front where you and your copilot sit while
underway.  Aft of the driver and passenger seat is "cut away" so the motorhome
body can be added.

A Class A motorhome is built on a chassis from the rails up from
bumper-to-bumper.  In many cases, the driver and copilot seating area is built
more-or-less like the rest of the coach.

I am unaware of much (any?) empirical evidence to support a claim that a Class
C is safer than a Class A in an accident, but I believe it based simply on
having viewed the wreckage of several RVs.  They generally disintegrate in a
severe accident, especially involving a rollover.  Many believe that the front
end of a cutaway van/chassis is inherently safer than many Class As in this
regard.

> I'm looking in the 38 to 40 ft long.

In that case, your only choice is a Class A.  I wouldn't give the safety
comparison another thought.  Buckle up.

            :)
JR
Ed - 12 Nov 2005 16:12 GMT
>>> Hi. I am interested in buying a class I motorhome and would like to
>>> know where is a good website to compare all the different types that
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> looking in the 38 to 40 ft long.
> Thanks
Read what the RV.ORG web site has to say about them. I have seen several
 accidents not the least of which was one this week. It would have been
fatal for the person in the left front seat. While the number of
accidents I have seen first hand is not large there were no fatalities
in the Class C's. But please read what the web site I cited says about
them. If you are looking into a Coach that long money would seem to not
be an issue, then look at a Prevost as I would tend to think the front
end would have more integrity.

Ed
Daniel L. Lieberman - 12 Nov 2005 16:46 GMT


>>>> Hi. I am interested in buying a class I motorhome and would like to
>>>> know where is a good website to compare all the different types that
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
>
> Ed

There is a big jump from a class c to a Prevost at $1,000,000 plus.

As far a safety is concerned Country Coach, which I own, has as do most
moderate and up Class As, ABS.
Further you are higher up that in a Class C.

The fact that someone can kill himself in a Class A doesn't make it likely.
After all a Class Z (non-moving house) won't ever be in an accident- unless
there is a flood or a hurricane or a tornado or ....

I suggest that you read the specs carefully as regards length of 40'
coaches. Some are actually >40'. California according to some postings bars
>40' coaches on local roads. Someone claims this has changed but check it
out. That is why we bought a 36.

Good luck.
William Boyd - 12 Nov 2005 18:47 GMT
>  
>
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>
> Good luck.

Bus conversions are not in the accident survival class that other
class A rigs are. They were built under much more rigid guidelines.
In fact I have my doubts that many of the standard MH coaches were
built under any safety rules. This is my opinion on the latter.
On the Bus conversions that is a positive and the school buses are
included in that.

Signature

BILL P.

Ed - 12 Nov 2005 19:39 GMT
>  
>
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>
> Good luck.

I agree with this, and wide body coaches,and travel trailers are banned
in all States. But that doesn't mean they are ticketed.
Tom  J - 12 Nov 2005 20:45 GMT
> I agree with this, and wide body coaches,and travel trailers are
> banned in all States. But that doesn't mean they are ticketed.

Not so. You can take wide body rigs on any road you see an 18 wheeler
on in all states. Most have also corrected their regulations to allow
45 foot motorhomes, including California.

Don't believe all you read in newsgroups!

Tom J
Will Sill - 12 Nov 2005 20:46 GMT
I see where Ed <ektared@att.net> contributed:

>. . . .wide body coaches,and travel trailers are banned
>in all States.

Poppycock & bafflegab.   It is true that some number of states have
rules against "wide" rigs (over 96") on some roads and even some US
highways.   But 102" rigs are legal everywhere on the Interstate
system and (at last count) over half of the States on other roads.

Ticketing is rare AFAIK.

Will Sill
The Curmudgeon of Sill Hill
GeoffP - 12 Nov 2005 22:55 GMT
>I see where Ed <ektared@att.net> contributed:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Will Sill
> The Curmudgeon of Sill Hill
---So Will, 102" is legal in over half the States? How about the other half?
Don't you ever think before you post?
Geoff.
Unk - 12 Nov 2005 23:09 GMT
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 17:55:47 -0500, "GeoffP" <Geoff@nospam.com>
wrote:..

>> Poppycock & bafflegab.   It is true that some number of states have
>> rules against "wide" rigs (over 96") on some roads and even some US
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>Don't you ever think before you post?
>Geoff.

Note he said 102" is legal everywhere on interstates.  Only on other
highways is there an issue.

I have been in 35+ states with my 102" rig and never gotten a ticket.

unk
Hunter - 12 Nov 2005 23:26 GMT
>---So Will, 102" is legal in over half the States? How about the other half?
>Don't you ever think before you post?
>Geoff.

That's not what Will wrote.....

Read it again.

Hunter
--

http://members.aol.com/hhamp5246/roadtrip2005.htm

Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well-preserved body,
but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "...holy sh.t...what a ride!"
Will Sill - 13 Nov 2005 12:34 GMT
I see where "GeoffP" <Geoff@nospam.com> contributed:

Ed <ektared@att.net> contributed:

>>>. . . .wide body coaches,and travel trailers are banned
>>>in all States.

Will:
>> Poppycock & bafflegab.   It is true that some number of states have
>> rules against "wide" rigs (over 96") on some roads and even some US
>> highways.   But 102" rigs are legal everywhere on the Interstate
>> system and (at last count) over half of the States on other roads.
>>
>> Ticketing is rare AFAIK.

GeoffP:
>---So Will, 102" is legal in over half the States? How about the other half?
>Don't you ever think before you post?

Often.  Do you?  Also, though my record is not perfect, I usually read
a post before insulting the writer.

=====================

ALL interstate highways, in all States, permit 102" widths.  
No States "prohibit"  widebodies, but MANY jurisdictions restrict
or prohibit vehicles over 96" wide on *certain* roads. These
restrictions vary widely. Jurisdictions with restrictions include
AL, AZ, DE, DC, FL, GA, IL, KY, LA, MD, MI, NE, NJ, NY, NC, OK,
PA, VA & WV.

Source: 1998 "TRUCKERS ATLAS FOR PROFESSIONAL DRIVERS"

======================

Obviously the above information is dated, but the point was and is
that the statement "wide body coaches,and travel trailers are banned
in all States" is incorrect.

Will Sill
"A great many people think they are thinking when they
are merely rearranging their prejudices."
William James
Hunter - 12 Nov 2005 22:59 GMT
> But 102" rigs are legal everywhere on the Interstate
>system and (at last count) over half of the States on other roads.

My trailer is 102" wide.... but technically the awning arms make it a
few inches wider...

Hunter
--

http://members.aol.com/hhamp5246/roadtrip2005.htm

Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well-preserved body,
but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "...holy sh.t...what a ride!"
William Boyd - 12 Nov 2005 23:08 GMT
>>But 102" rigs are legal everywhere on the Interstate
>>system and (at last count) over half of the States on other roads.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Hunter
Yes Hunter but I think they wrap around the side and allow the
awning to not extend out beyond the side. But does your arms still
stick out beyond where the clearance lights are at.

Signature

BILL P.
Just Dog
  &
 ME

Frank Tabor - 12 Nov 2005 23:26 GMT
>>>But 102" rigs are legal everywhere on the Interstate
>>>system and (at last count) over half of the States on other roads.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>awning to not extend out beyond the side. But does your arms still
>stick out beyond where the clearance lights are at.

Yes.
Signature

Frank Tabor

Leanne - 12 Nov 2005 23:29 GMT
> >>But 102" rigs are legal everywhere on the Interstate
> >>system and (at last count) over half of the States on other roads.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> awning to not extend out beyond the side. But does your arms still
> stick out beyond where the clearance lights are at.

What about mirrors? Our widebody coach measures 101" from
outside mirror edge to the outside of the other one.

Leanne
William Boyd - 13 Nov 2005 00:00 GMT
>>>On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:46:33 GMT, Will Sill <will@epix.enet>
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Leanne

I do not have reference to it right now but as I remember all
required safety equipment is not considered to be within the 102"
requirement. I cannot remember where the reference to that is but I
will do a little research and see if I can locate it.

Signature

BILL P.
Just Dog
  &
 ME

Leanne - 13 Nov 2005 00:44 GMT
Correction....
>> What about mirrors? Our widebody coach measures 120" from
> outside mirror edge to the outside of the other one.
>
> Leanne
William Boyd - 13 Nov 2005 01:21 GMT
> Correction....
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>>Leanne

What state are you in? Best I can see you could be 114" wide in
Hawaii, you are even to wide for them. Me Thinks ;-)

Signature

BILL P.
Just Dog
  &
 ME

D.J. Osborn - 13 Nov 2005 01:25 GMT
>> Correction....
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> What state are you in? Best I can see you could be 114" wide in Hawaii,
> you are even to wide for them. Me Thinks ;-)

Mirrors--since they are safety equipment--are exempt from the width
requirement. Rubber fender flares are also exempt, and--in some states-- so
are awnings on RVs.

Signature

D.J., N8DO; FMCA 147762
dj[underscore]osborn at yahoo dot com

Tom  J - 13 Nov 2005 00:44 GMT
.

> What about mirrors? Our widebody coach measures 101" from
> outside mirror edge to the outside of the other one.

Your RV is not a full wide body. If it was, you would be 102" PLUS the
mirrors.

Tom J
William Boyd - 13 Nov 2005 00:55 GMT
>>>On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:46:33 GMT, Will Sill <will@epix.enet>
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Leanne

Federal Vehicle Regulation Part 658.15 sub paragraph (c),(2).
(2) A State may allow recreational vehicles with safety and/or
non-cargo carrying appurtenances extending beyond 3 inches from the
side of the vehicle to operate without a special use over-width permit.

http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/rules-regulations/administration/fmcsr/fmcsrruletext.as
p?rule_toc=778&section=658.15&section_toc=2134


The above is where the feds allow a state the 3 inch leeway but I
did not come up with where the feds allow it, Dont think one would
need to. Or maybe they set limitations and the state sets the basic
standard within the feds guidelines. ???
Signature

BILL P.
Just Dog
  &
 ME

Unk - 13 Nov 2005 22:40 GMT
>> But 102" rigs are legal everywhere on the Interstate
>>system and (at last count) over half of the States on other roads.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Hunter

My mirrors extend out more than 6" past the edges.  But they do
collapse/shatter on impact.
William Boyd - 12 Nov 2005 22:36 GMT
>>  
>>
[quoted text clipped - 67 lines]
> I agree with this, and wide body coaches,and travel trailers are banned
> in all States. But that doesn't mean they are ticketed.

I am not sure you are correct about wide body coaches being banned.
 The usual allowed width in 102", I think this is what the wide
body term means. Most states allow clearance lights to exceed that
but if you have an awning hanging out over it they have been known
to give tickets. I would think it would be considered a warning type
ticket, but it is put on the record and could show if you continue
with out making adjustments.
http://www.wecamp2.com/size.html

Signature

Bill P.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.