Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / RVs / June 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Ram 2500 or 3500?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Steve B - 15 Jun 2006 19:17 GMT
Which would you buy to pull a 28' 5er?  Not a lot more for a 3500.  4wd,
single rear wheels.  Would a 2500 be marginal, adequate, or just get the
3500, and have it pull about anything?  Going with the Cummins Diesel.

Steve
RonB - 15 Jun 2006 21:03 GMT
> Which would you buy to pull a 28' 5er?

Are you talking about Travel Trailer or 5th Wheel?.  In either case a 3/4 HD
should be fine.  We have pulled a 31' Fifth Wheel with a 2500HD 8100 Chevy
for three years with good towing results.  Just upgraded to a 2500HD Duramax
6600 but no towing yet.

RonB
Kevin - 15 Jun 2006 22:57 GMT
I second the 2500HD w/ 8.1L. Pulls like a Clydesdale w/ the Allison tranny
and 4.10. I tow a 32' 5'er w/out any problems at all. Have to love the
Allison's low reverse for pushing it backwards uphill into my driveway as
well!

>> Which would you buy to pull a 28' 5er?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> RonB
RonB - 16 Jun 2006 00:54 GMT
I think the Allison transmission is one of the best safety features
available on GM trucks.  We had the first truck (8100) in the mountains
several times and it really took care of us.  The braking characteristics
are great.  I agree the 8.1L pulls like a Clydesdale and we had the higher
geared rear end (3:73).  Unfortunately, we had one of the earlier 8.1s and
the piston slap + erratic oil consumption left us thinking it wasn't going
to be a long term vehicle.  With all of the GM service bulletins installed
we did straighten out the non-towing oil consumptioin (1,200 to 1,800 mpq on
average).  However the towing consumption was a litttle un-nerving.  On
several occasions we experienced back-to-back consumption on the order of
1,200/400/1,400 mpq.  On one occasion it dropped to 300 mpq. Apparently they
have corrected the oil problems on the 2003 and after machines.

RonB

>I second the 2500HD w/ 8.1L. Pulls like a Clydesdale w/ the Allison tranny
>and 4.10. I tow a 32' 5'er w/out any problems at all. Have to love the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>
>> RonB
john - 16 Jun 2006 00:11 GMT
> Which would you buy to pull a 28' 5er?  Not a lot more for a 3500.  4wd,
> single rear wheels.  Would a 2500 be marginal, adequate, or just get the
> 3500, and have it pull about anything?  Going with the Cummins Diesel.
>
> Steve

My opinion: Get the 3500 and optional lower gears. It may save you
buying another truck if you decide to tow heavier later on.
You're not going to save anything significant by getting the 2500.
I've never heard anyone complain about having too much truck when towing.
William Boyd - 16 Jun 2006 00:47 GMT
>> Which would you buy to pull a 28' 5er?  Not a lot more for a 3500.  
>> 4wd, single rear wheels.  Would a 2500 be marginal, adequate, or just
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> You're not going to save anything significant by getting the 2500.
> I've never heard anyone complain about having too much truck when towing.

I can agree with you on the not complaining about having to much truck
on the towing, except for the use of more fuel, my complaint is having
to much truck between towing. When a 2500 is adequate for towing what
you have, it does not make good sense to get a 3500 when you do not need
it. Chances are replacement time for the tow vehicle will outnumber the
rig you are towing. Upgrade to a larger tow vehicle may be warranted
with future expectations of obtaining a larger RV. But the ratio of tow
vehicle to towed vehicle would be to my estimation around three to one.

Signature

BILL P.

2004, 2500 SLT Quad Cab, Dodge Ram,
SLT, SWB, 2WD, Short Bed
5.9 HO Turbo Diesel, 48RE Auto Trans,
Anti-Spin 3.73 Dif.Rhino Liner,
Husky 16K,Slider. Voyager Controller
2005, 27RL Wildcat, DT/PC Wi-Fi.
two 6volt AGM Trojan Batteries,
1500watt Vector Inverter
Dual EU2000i Hondas

Just Me and Dog

Greg Surratt - 16 Jun 2006 11:15 GMT
>>> Which would you buy to pull a 28' 5er?  Not a lot more for a 3500.  
>>> 4wd, single rear wheels.  Would a 2500 be marginal, adequate, or just
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>with future expectations of obtaining a larger RV. But the ratio of tow
>vehicle to towed vehicle would be to my estimation around three to one.

Yeahbutt . . .  he's talking about the difference between a 2500 or a
3500 SRW.  Same drive train through and through.  How much difference
can there be in fuel mileage between two trucks that are spec'ed so
close together?

Greg
William Boyd - 17 Jun 2006 02:14 GMT
>  
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>Greg
>  

I really dont have the technical answer except more tires on the ground
and more wheels to turn, cost more fuel.

Signature

BILL P.
Just
Me
&
DOG

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Bob Hatch - 17 Jun 2006 03:33 GMT
> I really dont have the technical answer except more tires on the
> ground and more wheels to turn, cost more fuel.

Do you have any idea what SRW means when discussing pickups?

Signature

"You can say any foolish thing to a dog, and the dog
will give you a look that says, 'My God, you're right!
I never would've thought of that!'"
--Dave Barry
http://www.bobhatch.com
http://www.tdsrvresort.com

JerryD(upstateNY) - 17 Jun 2006 10:52 GMT
>>Do you have any idea what SRW means when discussing pickups?<<

For some reason 3500 = dual rear wheels to Mr. Boyd.
Hey Bill...........are you listening ?????????
EVERYONE (except you) is talking about a 3500 with SINGLE rear wheels.

Signature

JerryD(upstateNY)

William Boyd - 18 Jun 2006 06:50 GMT
>  
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>  

Oh yes I do but the single rear wheel aka SRW has very little additional
weight capacity rating.
Tires and wheels are a size and weight larger. Has the same suspension
as the 2500. Front brakes and suspension part numbers are the same.

Signature

BILL P.
Just
Me
&
DOG

MoParMaN - 16 Jun 2006 01:58 GMT
> Which would you buy to pull a 28' 5er?  Not a lot more for a 3500.  4wd,
> single rear wheels.  Would a 2500 be marginal, adequate, or just get the
> 3500, and have it pull about anything?  Going with the Cummins Diesel.
>
> Steve
I've got the Dodge 3500 Dually. I can yank my 36 foot 5th wheeler anywhere I
want and it never moans.
For the price difference I'll always get the bigger truck. Course, I live in
Texas and 2500's are considered toy trucks.

Signature

MoParMaN---Remove Clothes To Reply!
--SCUD Coordinates 32.61204 North: 96.92993 West--

john - 16 Jun 2006 02:54 GMT
>> Which would you buy to pull a 28' 5er?  Not a lot more for a 3500.  4wd,
>> single rear wheels.  Would a 2500 be marginal, adequate, or just get the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> For the price difference I'll always get the bigger truck. Course, I live in
> Texas and 2500's are considered toy trucks.

Got to agree on Country Cadillacs. I don't want another car.
RAM³ - 16 Jun 2006 06:52 GMT
> Which would you buy to pull a 28' 5er?  Not a lot more for a 3500.  4wd,
> single rear wheels.  Would a 2500 be marginal, adequate, or just get the
> 3500, and have it pull about anything?  Going with the Cummins Diesel.
>
> Steve

A quick rule of thumb: if 25% of the 5er's GVWR would exceed the "payload"
limit of the truck it's time to look for a bigger truck! <G>

The limiting factor for a SRW is the tires: can THEY support the weight?

True, the SRW 3500 is rated 1100 lbs more GVWR >but< it doesn't come with
that much more "payload" capability.

OTOH, it's too bad that you are unwilling to go with the DRW since the 4600#
"payload" capability can accept the pin weight of a relatively heavy
trailer. [I saw one this afternoon that was pulling a flatbed gooseneck with
13 "round" bales of hay on it.]
William Boyd - 17 Jun 2006 02:35 GMT
>  
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
>  

Yep! I was in the hay business for quite a while following me selling
all of my cattle. And I had a DRW stake bed with a goose neck pulled a
trailer that had 12 round bales on it , had the right truck for the
right job. When I finished, I would park the hay hauling rig and get in
my 1500 GMC and haul my a.s down to the coffee shop and eat supper,
again had the right truck for the right job. Now why in hell would I
want to go to town in a big a.s DW truck for. I just do not weigh that
muck, DOG dont either. :-(  

I found the 5er that would fit in my barn after getting all the hay out,
then bought a truck that was well capable of pulling what I had
selected. Mistakes, yes if I had it to do over again I believe I would
have bought the 4X4 :-\ , bigger truck, not hardly, I've got the right
truck for the right job. I can even run it through the auto spa, cont
take a DRW in one. =-O

Signature

BILL P.
Just
Me
&
DOG

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

john - 17 Jun 2006 04:24 GMT
>>  
>>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> truck for the right job. I can even run it through the auto spa, cont
> take a DRW in one. =-O

I love my dualie as does everybody else around. It gets about 20mpg when
I can keep my foot out of it. It runs like a hotrod when I want it to.
It has plenty of stretch room. It's got everything I could concievably
want in a man's truck. I may have to park a few spaces out but what the
heck.
My wife has a F150 crewcab short bed. It is nice but I like the way my
diesel runs.
Steve B - 20 Jun 2006 05:57 GMT
Just returned from three dealers in Utah.  Pretty much established that the
towing capacities weren't increased much between the 2500 and 3500 because
of the added weight of the springs, wheels, and heavier axle.

So, we settled on the 2500.  We are leaving tomorrow PM from Las Vegas to
deliver the Newmar, and will be buying shortly after return.

Thanks for all the help.

I do have a new question re: short vs. long bed that will be asked to start
another thread.

Thanks again, all.

Steve
RAM³ - 20 Jun 2006 06:04 GMT
> Just returned from three dealers in Utah.  Pretty much established that
> the towing capacities weren't increased much between the 2500 and 3500
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Steve

With a long-bed you can use an air-suspension hitch such as the EasyRider!
<G>

Long-beds usually command better resale, too.
William Boyd - 21 Jun 2006 00:00 GMT
>  
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
>  

http://www.go-rv.com/coast/do/catalog/page?index=A&pageNext=TRUE&dealerId=7&page
Num=530

Dont matter about the bed size.

Signature

BILL P.
Just
Me
&
DOG

Frank Tabor - 20 Jun 2006 14:54 GMT
>Just returned from three dealers in Utah.  Pretty much established that the
>towing capacities weren't increased much between the 2500 and 3500 because
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>Steve

The 3500 has a higher GVWR.  More pin weight.  More payload.  That 14000
lb fiver may have a pin weight that exceeds the 2500.
Signature

Frank Tabor

William Boyd - 21 Jun 2006 00:06 GMT
>  
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>lb fiver may have a pin weight that exceeds the 2500.
>  

I didn't think any one mentioned the weight of the 5er they were going
to tow. And yes if it is over 13,450 he would need a heavier tow vehicle
than a Ram 2500.

Signature

BILL P.
Just
Me
&
DOG

Ed MacNeil - 18 Jun 2006 17:37 GMT
> Which would you buy to pull a 28' 5er?  Not a lot more for a 3500.  4wd,
> single rear wheels.  Would a 2500 be marginal, adequate, or just get the
> 3500, and have it pull about anything?  Going with the Cummins Diesel.
>
> Steve

I'm pulling a 31' Colorado 5th wheel rig, just over 12,000# with a 2002
 Ram 2500, Cummins, 6 speed stick.  Works good!  Cummins should be good
for as long as you want to keep it.  Good Choice.

Ed MacNeil, Ancient Aviator
North Hampton, New Hamster
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.