>>> IF he had actually looked at the brakes, he Would have seen the
>> missing inboard pad. What a dumass. Not to mention that they had to
>> have been grinding for some time for it to get thin enough to fall out.<<
>
> And then to top it all off, he writes to a magazine about the incident and
> puts his name and address on the letter.
What I find even more interesting is that the Good Sam (it is NOT a
club) magazine people, so afraid of alienating even one subscriber, did
not choose to use this occurrence as an example of the pitiful nature of
some who drive these behemoths on the public roads. The Good Sam answer
was useless as an admonition against this sort of person even being
allowed to drive any vehicle.
That is why we need better licensing laws for operators of RVs. These
laws would not be an accusation of incompetence against the majority of
us who handle our rigs well enough, but they might at least get some of
these clowns off the road. Such people are a danger to all of us.
Ken
JerryD(upstateNY) - 10 Jul 2006 11:23 GMT
> That is why we need better licensing laws for operators of RVs. These
> laws would not be an accusation of incompetence against the majority
> of us who handle our rigs well enough, but they might at least get
> some of these clowns off the road. Such people are a danger to all
> of us.
They did a thing on TV about the guy who was towing a toad that blew out a
tire and the driver didn't notice it.
He set fires along the road for 5 miles or so.
Many people flashed their lights, honked their horn and waved at him....and
he kept right on driving down the road.
He said people do that all the time.
How many of you have people flash their lights, honk their horn and wave
their hands at you as you drive down the road ?
This guy must be a nitwit behind the wheel.

Signature
JerryD(upstateNY)
Will Sill - 10 Jul 2006 11:47 GMT
I see where Ken Harrison <sptrain98@earthlink.net> contributed:
>That is why we need better licensing laws for operators of RVs. These
>laws would not be an accusation of incompetence against the majority of
>us who handle our rigs well enough, but they might at least get some of
>these clowns off the road. Such people are a danger to all of us.
Sorry, I disagree.
No licensing law - let alone 50 different versions of same - can
possibly weed out Stupid. The vast majority of wrecks occur because
someone does something easily recognized as Stupid - NOT because of a
lack of knowledge. Training provides knowledge; licensing creates
another bungling bureaucracy to suck up money - neither prevents
Stupid.
As an industrial Safety Engineer (anklebiters, here's your opening!)
I've investigated thousands of incidents. Only very rarely does lack
of training prove to be the root cause of an incident. Instead, most
problem incidents arise from bad judgment or a deliberate attempt to
break the rules.
More stringent licensing is a costly solution in search of a problem
that simply isn't a Big Deal. For every blundering bozo who doesn't
know enough to shift his bulgemobile down descending mountain roads
there are a hundred thousand who manage to engage their brains well
enough to get along OK.
When was the last time a gummit program solved a problem anyway?
Will Sill
The Curmudgeon of Sill Hill
wwemu@cwnet.com - 10 Jul 2006 13:50 GMT
>When was the last time a gummit program solved a problem anyway?
>
>Will Sill
>The Curmudgeon of Sill Hill
Well, Will,
EVERY time the gummit starts a new program or expands it, it solves
part of the problem of what to do with those incompetents that were
drawing welfare or otherwise were costing the gummit. A good example
was the Census of 2000. They hired unemployed people that never had a
job and made them the supervisors. If you had experience, they did
not want you. However, the fact that those incompetents "worked" for
a period of time, the gummit justified extending unemployment and
other welfare benefits.
I do agree with your comment that added licensing will not solve
anything, especially when most of the present licensing officials have
no concept on how to operate even a four wheeler safely let alone any
type of large rig. Anyone that expects the gummint to do ANYTHING
efficiently or for the good of the people is living in a ream world.
George
GBinNC - 10 Jul 2006 15:58 GMT
>As an industrial Safety Engineer (anklebiters, here's your opening!)
>I've investigated thousands of incidents.
Not biting anybody's ankles -- just curious:
"Thousands of incidents," you say? Wouldn't a major part of a Safety
Engineer's job be to *reduce* safety incidents?
That must have been some deadly toilet paper factory....
GB in NC
Rich - 10 Jul 2006 13:16 GMT
>>>> IF he had actually looked at the brakes, he Would have seen the
>>> missing inboard pad. What a dumass. Not to mention that they had to
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>Ken
and exactly how would 'better licensing laws for operators of RV's'
prevented this situation? you're trying to screen for common sense
and that's a fool's errand.
73,
rich, n9dko