Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / RVs / April 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Are Big RVs Too Dangerous?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Miguel Indurain - 08 Apr 2007 23:18 GMT
As several have mentioned here big RV's are not tested for
crashworthiness, dynamic stability and road handling. Couple this with
elderly/older drivers with ordinary drivers licenses and you may have
a recipe for impending disaster. It looks like several lawyers make a
living off of the RV industry:

http://rvforsaleguide.com/rv-accident-lawyer.htm

Claims of several thousand a year killed by RV's are made. It just
takes a few cases for most products to get recalled why are RV the
exception? Are you RV drivers guinea pigs/cannonfodder for a predatory
RV/lawyer industry. You die while others profit. Is your life that
cheap?

Careful driving does not make up for unsafe/untested products as there
are  always the unsafe or impaired drivers. Operators of RV's need
controls easy to see and operate with ergonomic seating and cockpit
arrangement. They need low overhead alarms, back up cameras and
infrared night vision to increase the safety. The vehicle could use
stability, traction control and driver alertness metering equipment.

I would even go as far as considering external airbags to lessen the
harm done to pedestrians, smaller cars, bicyclist and motorcyclists.
Increased operating testing would be a good economical start followed
up with more stringent vehicle testing. There is no reason why RVers
have to be treated as second class citizens.

Miguel
Axel Merckx - 08 Apr 2007 23:56 GMT
Big Mig! Is that really you?

Axel

> As several have mentioned here big RV's are not tested for
> crashworthiness, dynamic stability and road handling. Couple this with
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Miguel
Ted Bell / Shad O'Shay - 09 Apr 2007 00:08 GMT
> As several have mentioned here big RV's are not tested for
> crashworthiness, dynamic stability and road handling. Couple this with
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Miguel

Now, that last statement is a laugh. I say there is reason they should
be treated like second-class citizens, namely because they ARE second
class citizens. Or most of them to be sure. There a couple reasonable
people here but the majority consists of ignorant bullies.  I say let
them keep being human lab rats. They don't merit much better than that.
Never in my life have I seen a more classless bunch than these RV
people.

Shad O'Shay
Tom  J - 09 Apr 2007 00:22 GMT
> As several have mentioned here big RV's

Go fish in your on turf!!

Plonk
Dean - 09 Apr 2007 18:34 GMT
>As several have mentioned here big RV's are not tested for
>crashworthiness, dynamic stability and road handling. Couple this with
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
>Miguel

Of course realize this is, in reality, Shad or Ted, or what ever nom
d' plume he is operating under.
CriticalMass - 10 Apr 2007 19:07 GMT
> Of course realize this is, in reality, Shad or Ted, or what ever nom
> d' plume he is operating under.

It's the replies these trolls get that keeps 'em coming back for more.

Ignoring them and their posts is the obvious remedy.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.