 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / RVs / April 2007Who best represents RVers?
Who do you think would best represent the interests of RVers: Republicans or Democrats? I think the Democrats would create a lot more parks but close off a lot more vehicle access and raise gas taxes. RVs would become safer, more expensive and places would be less crowded. The Republicans would open up more areas to vehicles but raise user fees, increase logging, increase mineral extraction but create lower gas prices and help RV manufacturers. RVs might become less safe, less expensive and places more crowded. It is almost a toss up, I can't decide who would be better. Ms Bingham > Who do you think would best represent the interests of RVers: > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > and help RV manufacturers. RVs might become less safe, less expensive and > places more crowded. Logging isn't a bad thing if done right. When it's done wrong as happened in Arizona where it was halted almost completely it led to massive forest fires due to small new growth that choked the forest from too high density. The Republicans were able to get controlled logging back in operation. The result is the forests look fantastic now especially in the campground areas that are prone to fires. Lower wood prices also lower costs of wood framed RV's!! Campgrounds would be more crowded with more restrictions put on forests that closed them off to RV's. Not the other way around. The remaining open places would have to handle the load. >> Who do you think would best represent the interests of RVers: >> [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >that closed them off to RV's. Not the other way around. The remaining >open places would have to handle the load. I just took my Roadtrek up through the National Forests near Flagstaff this last week. Beautiful forests, beautiful country. It was real windy. Sorry to see them mining away those cinder cones east of Flagstaff. I think the Republicans best represent RVers, the Democrats best represent people who live in cities and never see the wilderness except for what is on tv. Warren Spelter "I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! I would also remind you that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue." B. M. Goldwater, 1964 ok my Roadtrek up through the National Forests near > Flagstaff this last week. Beautiful forests, beautiful country. It was > real windy. Sorry to see them mining away those cinder cones east of > Flagstaff. They have been using the cinder for decades. They use it in the winter on the highways rather than salt and sand. When spread onto the iced over roads it becomes almost as good as pavement and doesn't cause the corrosion damage that salt does. It also isn't environmentally unfriendly since the natural area is made up of the same thing. I don't know what the solution is either but I do prefer cinder over salt. > It is almost a toss up, I can't decide who would be better. > > Ms Bingham It is a toss-up. It all boils down to how much the Politician costs. Some Democrats are cheaper than some Republicans. I've heard some Politicians can be bought for under 10K. You get what you pay for tho. Hank <~~~thinks everyone should own at least one Politician | > It is almost a toss up, I can't decide who would be better. | > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] | | Hank <~~~thinks everyone should own at least one Politician Problem, according to LBJ, is politicians don't stay bought. Who best represents RVers? That's easy. It's Bluto the bully from the Popeye cartoons. Or it could be Bozo the Clown. I have a hard time deciding between the two. Shad O'Shay > Who best represents RVers? That's easy. It's Bluto the bully from the > Popeye cartoons. Or it could be Bozo the Clown. I have a hard time > deciding between the two. > > Shad O'Shay Shouldn't you be out on your daddy's sailboat rather than spending time here flaming the RV people? >> Who best represents RVers? That's easy. It's Bluto the bully from >> the Popeye cartoons. Or it could be Bozo the Clown. I have a hard [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Shouldn't you be out on your daddy's sailboat rather than spending > time here flaming the RV people? Can't go sailing now. Just got done competing in the Paris-Roubaix and got races scheduled weekly thru the summer. I like to drop in here frequently just to see how the sedentary side of America looks at things. BTW, Google Sunday's race and see who kicked a.s on the famed cobbles? Note the similarity to my nym. ;-) Shad O'Shay On Apr 16, 11:19 am, "Shad O'Shay" <shados...@elsewhere.invalid> wrote: > >> Who best represents RVers? That's easy. It's Bluto the bully from > >> the Popeye cartoons. Or it could be Bozo the Clown. I have a hard [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Shad O'Shay And the dissimilarity to your height and weight? > It is almost a toss up, I can't decide who would be better. > > Ms Bingham Libertarians would represent us best. "I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them. It is not to inaugurate new programs, but to cancel old ones that do violence to the Constitution, or that have failed in their purpose, or that impose on the people an unwarranted financial burden. I will not attempt to discover whether legislation is 'needed' before I have first determined whether it is constitutionally permissible. And if I should later be attacked for neglecting my constituents"interests,' I shall reply that I was informed their main interest is liberty and that in that cause, I am doing the very best I can." Amen!
|
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.