 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / RVs / September 2007Has anyone stayed at : Mustang S.P. or Galveston Is. S.P. (Texas) ?
Im considering staying at both , long term starting end of Nov. 2007 . Mustang S.P. is in Corpus Christi and is right on the beach. Ive read good reviews on it. If you have experience with either, please tell of it. Thanks. Dave On Aug 19, 6:08 pm, DaveInLakeVi...@webtv.net (Dave in Lake Villa) wrote: > Im considering staying at both , long term starting end of Nov. 2007 . > Mustang S.P. is in Corpus Christi and is right on the beach. Ive read > good reviews on it. If you have experience with either, please tell of > it. Thanks. Dave Try Mustang Ranch near Reno, hear tell it's open for business again > On Aug 19, 6:08 pm, DaveInLakeVi...@webtv.net (Dave in Lake Villa) > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Try Mustang Ranch near Reno, hear tell it's open for business again Shame! Isn't that a whore house? Harry Harris  SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com For camping in this area, you should look into Goose Island State Park in Rockport. You have your choice of secluded, tree-lined campsites or sites on the beach complete with shelter. Rockport is a short drive and ferry ride from Port Aransas and the Gulf of Mexico. Rockport has several good restaurants (I like The Big Fisherman !) and shops. Knox G. > Im considering staying at both , long term starting end of Nov. 2007 . > Mustang S.P. is in Corpus Christi and is right on the beach. Ive read > good reviews on it. If you have experience with either, please tell of > it. Thanks. Dave 'For camping in this area, you should look into Goose Island State Park in Rockport. You have your choice of secluded, tree-lined campsites or sites on the beach complete with shelter. Rockport is a short drive and ferry ride from Port Aransas and the Gulf of Mexico. Rockport has several good restaurants (I like The Big Fisherman !) and shops. Knox G.' REPLY: I shall, by golly. Thanks. I assume you meant to say Port 'Arkansas' ??? Ill look it up on the map and see if Goose Island SP has a website. Quote from Sir Arthur Keith, a noted anthropologist and devout Darwinian Evolutionist : " Evolution is unproved and unprovable . We believe it because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable" > REPLY: I shall, by golly. Thanks. I assume you meant to say Port > 'Arkansas' ??? Ill look it up on the map and see if Goose Island SP has > a website. He meant Port *Aransas*. That's the name of the place. You might try consulting a map. SignatureJanet Wilder Bad spelling. Bad punctuation Good Friends. Good Life I shall, by golly. Thanks. I assume you meant to say Port 'Arkansas' ??? Ill look it up on the map and see if Goose Island SP has a website. "He meant Port *Aransas*. That's the name of the place. You might try consulting a map. SignatureJanet Wilder" REPLY: I did. And Janet, if you cant talk nicely then please dont respond to my posts. There is never any justification for guff. We all belong to the greater family of RVing . Dave. Quote from Sir Arthur Keith, a noted anthropologist and devout Darwinian Evolutionist : " Evolution is unproved and unprovable . We believe it because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable" On Aug 24, 5:27 pm, DaveInLakeVi...@webtv.net (Dave in Lake Villa) wrote: > I shall, by golly. Thanks. I assume you meant to say Port > 'Arkansas' ??? Ill look it up on the map and see if Goose Island SP has [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > respond to my posts. There is never any justification for guff. We all > belong to the greater family of RVing . Dave. You dumb a**ed SOB. If you're so thin skinned that just a slight spelling correction sends you off the deep end, then you better go back to webtv and STAY THERE. I'm sure I'm not the only one here who has developed a negative attitude of your habit of lecturing others according to your own phony self-righteousness. And, you're quite welcome to leave ASAP Hal 'You dumb a**ed SOB. If you're so thin skinned that just a slight spelling correction sends you off the deep end, then you better go back to webtv and STAY THERE.' REPLY: I didnt 'go off the deep end' about a spelling correction ; it was the rude statement that i should go and consult a map , that was uncalled for. I dont talk that way to Janet, and, it would be quite nice to expect the same in return. Theres nothing 'self righteous' about that at all Hal. 'I'm sure I'm not the only one here who has developed a negative attitude of your habit of lecturing others according to your own phony self-righteousness.' REPLY: Im not at all concerned about your subjective view, Hal. And i think you know you shouldnt be resorting to foul name calling IE: You dumb a**ed SOB. Theres simply no need for this Hal. We are all part of the great RV adventure and name calling is wrong and very unecessary. I regret if my correcting you goes against the grain of being 'tolerant' to vile and foul name calling , but, its wrong Hal.. So, dont do things that are wrong --- its important to be a Do-Gooder instead. 'And, you're quite welcome to leave ASAP Hal' REPLY: Hal, i like it here . And i wont be leaving so long as i have an RV . So, lets be friends and quit the unproductive squabbeling . How is your RV running ? What trips have you been on this year ? Dave Quote from Sir Arthur Keith, a noted anthropologist and devout Darwinian Evolutionist : " Evolution is unproved and unprovable . We believe it because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable" > 'You dumb a**ed SOB. > If you're so thin skinned that just a slight spelling correction sends [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > nice to expect the same in return. Theres nothing 'self righteous' about > that at all Hal. I had no intention of being rude, but if you took it that way, it's not really my problem. If my statement appeared to be "rude" you might go back and look at your own. You corrected a gentleman who had spelled the name of the place correctly. Don't you think you were a bit rude to him? He was being helpful and you were correcting him without consulting a map. Don't you think you hurt his feelings? Don't you think you owe him an apology? SignatureJanet Wilder Bad spelling. Bad punctuation Good Friends. Good Life On Aug 24, 6:34 pm, DaveInLakeVi...@webtv.net (Dave in Lake Villa) wrote: > 'You dumb a**ed SOB. > If you're so thin skinned that just a slight spelling correction sends [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > was the rude statement that i should go and consult a map , that was > uncalled for. You mean to tell me that someone had the nerve to suggest that you waste your own precious time and look a map of the area? How totally rude of Janet! (EG) www.google.com, click maps and you can download a satellite image of the area, complete with listed roads. OH YEAH THAT'S RIGHT You're stuck with a technologically outmoded 10 year old internet terminal with 56K dial-up and 1.2 megs of storage Hal 'OH YEAH THAT'S RIGHT You're stuck with a technologically outmoded 10 year old internet terminal with 56K dial-up and 1.2 megs of storage Hal' REPLY: Yes ! But i love sitting in my recliner 8 feet away with a wireless keypad and favorite libation next to me. Are you the same Hal thats been visiting the Atheist NG's lately ? How come you dont want the personal Creator to exist Hal ? Whats up with all of that ? Quote from Sir Arthur Keith, a noted anthropologist and devout Darwinian Evolutionist : " Evolution is unproved and unprovable . We believe it because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable" Jesus Christ! Does everybody on this newsgroup have the world's thinnest skin? Chill! All many (if not most) of you seem to do is to throw barbs at most anybody who posts any unusual idea or question. But learn to spell, for god's sake. How can you bitch about the spelling errors of others? Look at the errors in this post: webtv for WebTV (Proper noun) didnt ' for didn't (it means "did not") dont for don't (twice) (it means "do not") Im for I'm (it means "I am") shouldnt for shouldn't (it means "should not") unecessary for unnecessary (the prefix is added to the word, and does not replace any of the word's letters) > 'You dumb a**ed SOB. > If you're so thin skinned that just a slight spelling correction sends [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > because the only alternative is special creation, and that is > unthinkable" "Noted anthropologist?" What are his bona fides? The above quote is meaningless. kh 'Jesus Christ! Does everybody on this newsgroup have the world's thinnest skin? Chill! All many (if not most) of you seem to do is to throw barbs at most anybody who posts any unusual idea or question.' REPLY: Jesus isnt in this NG. But he will be your final judge as promised Ken. 'But learn to spell, for god's sake.' REPLY: Im glad you DO believe in God afterall. 'Look at the errors in this post: webtv for WebTV (Proper noun) didnt ' for didn't (it means "did not") dont for don't (twice) (it means "do not") Im for I'm (it means "I am") shouldnt for shouldn't (it means "should not") unecessary for unnecessary (the prefix is added to the word, and does not replace any of the word's letters)' REPLY: Look at the error you are making by pretending that God , the personal Theistic Creator , doesnt exist .... so you can live life the way you want to. This is more aggregious than spelling errors. How come you dont want God to exist Ken ? What is up with this ? Would you like to chat about it for a little while ? Email me if you dont want to discuss it publicly. Regards. Quote from Sir Arthur Keith, a noted anthropologist and devout Darwinian Evolutionist : " Evolution is unproved and unprovable . We believe it because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable" > 'But learn to spell, for god's sake.' > > REPLY: Im glad you DO believe in God afterall. Note his use of lower case in 'god'. I suspect that's not a typo. >> 'But learn to spell, for god's sake.' >> >> REPLY: Im glad you DO believe in God afterall. > > Note his use of lower case in 'god'. I suspect that's not a typo. BINGO! 'Note his use of lower case in 'god'. I suspect that's not a typo.' REPLY: Regardless of lower case , upper case or any case... Gods name should not be used flippantly or as a convenience of speech , especially by alleged atheists ! The Creator of this Universe should be respected above all else. And, God doesnt believe in atheists because there is no such thing. Regards. Quote from Sir Arthur Keith, a noted anthropologist and devout Darwinian Evolutionist : " Evolution is unproved and unprovable . We believe it because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable" >'Note his use of lower case in 'god'. I suspect that's not a typo.' > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >above all else. And, God doesnt believe in atheists because there is no >such thing. Regards. "God" isn't a name. It's a classification of beings. '"God" isn't a name. It's a classification of beings.' REPLY: No Stan, there is only one true Creator God for this Universe and his name is Jehovah God in addition to a few other names for the same and only Theistic Creator in whos image we are fashioned. If you dont believe in him, perhaps you can explain how personality and emotions such as : Moral oughtness, ethical systems, intuition, abstract thinking, love, reasoning, rationalizing, et al... ultimately came from Materials such as rocks, dirt, and hydrogen gas (?) . Can you tell us how these highly personal things 'evolved' from non personal materials ? Thanks. Quote from Sir Arthur Keith, a noted anthropologist and devout Darwinian Evolutionist : " Evolution is unproved and unprovable . We believe it because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable" > '"God" isn't a name. It's a classification of beings.' > > REPLY: No Stan, there is only one true Creator God for this Universe > and his name is Jehovah God in addition to a few other names for the > same and only Theistic Creator in whos image we are fashioned. Was he caught playing footsie with an undercover cop in a bathroom? > "God" isn't a name. It's a classification of beings. Ignoring religious arguments, you are incorrect. As commonly used by monotheists, God is a name. God is a god. 'Ignoring religious arguments, you are incorrect. As commonly used by monotheists, God is a name. God is a god.' REPLY: This is correct. And, a good case can be made for the existence of a Theistic Creator (God) without even appealing to 'religious arguments' . >REPLY: This is correct. And, a good case can be made for the >existence of a Theistic Creator (God) without even appealing to >'religious arguments' . Terminology such as "theistic god" doesn't make any sense. 'Terminology such as "theistic god" doesn't make any sense.' REPLY: Would Theistic Creator make more sense to you Stan ? >'Terminology such as "theistic god" doesn't make any sense.' > >REPLY: Would Theistic Creator make more sense to you Stan ? Translated: a creator who believes in the existence of a god or gods?. Would Theistic Creator make more sense to you Stan ? Translated: a creator who believes in the existence of a god or gods?. REPLY: A personal Creator who is above and beyond what he created , much like a Painter is to his painting. >Would Theistic Creator make more sense to you Stan ? > >Translated: a creator who believes in the existence of a god or gods?. >REPLY: A personal Creator who is above and beyond what he created , >much like a Painter is to his painting. The concept of "personal" implies exclusive ownership; and something of a private nature which is not shared: like a toothbrush. Everyone has one of their own. There must be billions of these personal gods. But doesn't that sort of conflict with your previous statement: "There is only one true Creator God for this Universe." If that's the case, only one person in the universe owns this "personal" god; or he is not a personal, but a public god. ?? How many gods do you figure there are out there? 'The concept of "personal" implies exclusive ownership; and something of a private nature which is not shared: like a toothbrush.' REPLY: Yes i agree precisely. Because the personal Creator brought a highly fine tuned Universe into existence from nothing when he didnt have to, certainly shows that he 'owns' it and us. Fashioning a Universe and Earth with extremely narrow razor edge precision for our sake , is something that 'he shares' with us and demonstrates his enormous love and care for mankind in whos image we are created in. When you look around Stan, do you get the feeling that everything is wild happenstance without order or complexity, or, does it look personally fashioned with order and precision ? 'There must be billions of these personal gods. But doesn't that sort of conflict with your previous statement: "There is only one true Creator God for this Universe." ' REPLY: What is the problem you see with ONE Creator by which he made EVERYONE in his image (likeness) ? The Law of Biogenesis asserts that life only comes from life itself ; do you believe its possible for highly personal things such as ability to reason, rationalize, think in abstract, have intuition, love, empathy, etc.. to have come from NON personal materials such as dirt, rocks, and hydrogen gas ? If so, how did that occur.? 'only one person in the universe owns this "personal" god; or he is not a personal, but a public god. ?? How many gods do you figure there are out there?' REPLY: How can a human being 'own' this personal Theistic God ?! Because God created everything from nothing, then HE owns it. Does a Painter own the Painting he paints ? There can only be ONE infinite Theistic God , and that person is the Theistic God of the Bible because the Bible can be proven to be supernatural in origin and therefore what it has to say , is absolutely always true. No other Text can be proven to be divine , not the Koran nor the Mahabaratta or anything else. How open are you to moving closer to God if you were satisfied that he was real, existed, and loved you like no other ? > REPLY: A personal Creator who is above and beyond what he created , > much like a Painter is to his painting. Who made the Painter? much like a Painter is to his painting. "Who made the Painter?" REPLY: The finite Painter was made by his finite Parents ; but the INfinite personal Creator for the finite Universe doesnt need to be made -- he is eternal if he can bring something finite into existence from nothing. It would require him to be infinite in personality, emotions, will, ability, power, knowledge, morality, ethical, etc... ; only finite things need a Cause . God doesnt. >much like a Painter is to his painting. > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >emotions, will, ability, power, knowledge, morality, ethical, etc... ; >only finite things need a Cause . God doesnt. Here we have a collection of clueless, self appointed theologists agruing 'antics with semantics' and absolutely makes sense. Also, no one gives a flying f.ck! God told me so himself! > Here we have a collection of clueless, self appointed theologists > agruing 'antics with semantics' and absolutely makes sense. Also, no > one gives a flying f.ck! > > God told me so himself! You've got that right! DILV has proved himself to be a clueless religious troll who feels the need to tell everryone else how to live and what delusions to believe 'DILV has proved himself to be a clueless religious troll who feels the need to tell everryone else how to live and what delusions to believe' REPLY: What delusions you choose to follow, are up to you ; im just here to expose them which will help you . > REPLY: What delusions you choose to follow, are up to you ; Your delusions are painfully obvious. 'Here we have a collection of clueless, self appointed theologists agruing 'antics with semantics' and absolutely makes sense. Also, no one gives a flying f.ck! God told me so himself! ' REPLY: Here we have an alleged 'atheist' who is caught up in the pop-culture philosophies of Self Seeking pursuits and who only wants to live for the here and now ; he doesnt really care about the most important thing in all of history but one day it will suddenly be the biggest issue he could have ever been dealt. > REPLY: Here we have an alleged 'atheist' who is caught up in the > pop-culture philosophies of Self Seeking pursuits and who only wants to > live for the here and now ; he doesnt really care about the most > important thing in all of history but one day it will suddenly be the > biggest issue he could have ever been dealt. You forgot "You'll be sorry . . ." > 'Here we have a collection of clueless, self appointed theologists > agruing 'antics with semantics' and absolutely makes sense. Also, no one [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > important thing in all of history but one day it will suddenly be the > biggest issue he could have ever been dealt. When have I ever said I was an atheist? > much like a Painter is to his painting. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > made -- he is eternal if he can bring something finite into existence > from nothing. Wow! That was easy to say. One great big convenient exception to your whole point to make the whole superstition true. Does it get easier than that? >> "God" isn't a name. It's a classification of beings. > >Ignoring religious arguments, you are incorrect. As commonly used by >monotheists, God is a name. God is a god. A lot of terms are used incorrectly; and just because a bunch of monotheists use a term incorrectly, doesn't change the facts, or somehow legitimize error. BTW - who are these so-called monotheists?? On Aug 26, 4:07 am, DaveInLakeVi...@webtv.net (Dave in Lake Villa) wrote: Your quote is just as phony as you are, as it was made FOUR years after said person died! BYW.......pissoyourgod Hal > But learn to spell, for god's sake. How can you bitch about the > spelling errors of others? Look at the errors in this post: [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > unecessary for unnecessary (the prefix is added to the word, and does > not replace any of the word's letters) BINGO! Hal On Aug 19, 7:08 pm, DaveInLakeVi...@webtv.net (Dave in Lake Villa) wrote: > Im considering staying at both , long term starting end of Nov. 2007 . > Mustang S.P. is in Corpus Christi and is right on the beach. Ive read > good reviews on it. If you have experience with either, please tell of > it. Thanks. Dave OK things got a little weird there. If you want to stay on Mustang Island, the state park is ok. For about the same money there is a park in the town of Port Aransas (spelled that sucker right!) it is a whole lot closer to town and has nicer sites. If you want a decent RV park then my choice is the Pioneer nice sites and close to town with a three minute walk to the beach. Dave 'For about the same money there is a park in the town of Port Aransas (spelled that sucker right!) it is a whole lot closer to town and has nicer sites. If you want a decent RV park then my choice is the Pioneer nice sites and close to town with a three minute walk to the beach. Dave' REPLY: Thanks for this info. Are you saying the name of he RV Park is called 'The Pioneer' ??? On Aug 27, 7:36 pm, DaveInLakeVi...@webtv.net (Dave in Lake Villa) wrote: > 'For about the same money there is a park in the town of Port Aransas > (spelled that sucker right!) it is a whole lot closer to town and has [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > REPLY: Thanks for this info. Are you saying the name of he RV Park is > called 'The Pioneer' ??? Yup and it's usually filled with good old boys who love to fish. Most are from Texas. It runs about $500 per month. Has a pool, storage and a rec hall not to mention the bird ponds. Not the cheapest but the best in the area. Dave 'Yup and it's usually filled with good old boys who love to fish. Most are from Texas. It runs about $500 per month. Has a pool, storage and a rec hall not to mention the bird ponds. Not the cheapest but the best in the area. ' REPLY: I contacted them and here are their rates ; i dont think they Standard Back in Site is too bad at all especially for a month. Looks like a very nice place to stay and im sure ill enjoy it. So, many thanks Dave. Signed, Dave. our standard back-in sites are $ 160. weekly, $375. monthly plus electric our standard pull thru sites are $180. weekly, $595. monthly plus electric our premium back=in sites are $200. weekly, $520. monthly plus electric our premium pull thru sites are $200. weekly, $595. monthly plus electric Cable tv is additional $15. weekly, $25. monthly OK things got a little weird there. By that, I guess you mean dave from lake evil and his religious rantings. Ask yourself if Texas really needs another fool like this in your state? Perhaps you should give him directions to a nice safe RV park in Ciudad Juarez or Nuevo Loredo instead. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.